106.6% Adjusted Score

>106.6% Adjusted Score

APOLOGIZE

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=_xSGhuKENAY
evanmiller.org/bayesian-average-ratings.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

what the fuck does that even mean? has this system been used on other movies?

am i the only one here that gets annoyed when fantasy and sci-fi gets put in the same category?
every time i go to buy a book all the sci-fi stuff is mixed together with fantasy stuff like game of thrones

both are for children so it makes sense

there is nothing sci-fi about star wars.

i didn't say that it was, but would you think it'd be ok to make a top 10 list of fantasy works and have both stuff like star trek and lord of the rings in it?

I've never seen a movie defended to this degree. "Journalists" clearly see this movie and it's themes as important parts of the ongoing culture war.

This movie is the beginning of the end of drumpf's presidency

Reminds me of that South Park episode where Randy works out his adjusted penis size

Woah does this make it the most critically acclaimed piece of media ever?

youtube.com/watch?v=_xSGhuKENAY

>106.6%
What the fuck? What formula do they even use?

maybe not the movies

One that's supposed to account for discrepancies in the number of reviews. Basically if enough people reviewed TLJ it'd have a 106.6% approval rate.

It's so good it makes movies around it worse.

That is literally what's going on here.

>106.6% Adjusted Score
>#1
friendly reminder TLJ was never shilled it's just those nasty Russian alt-right hackers

Why does a Star Wars movie of all things need its own anti-defamation league?

Star trek *is* sci fi. At least for the era. A black woman in a position of relevance? Sci fi all right.

White people BTFO

WE

WUZ

KINO

(((adjustments)))

ADJUSTMENTZ

is this a joke

It's more likely that a bunch of 20-something, wealthy nepotism hires are being confronted by the possibility that they're not good at their jobs and aren't very good critics.

Remember the narcissists prayer:
That didn't happen.
>Somebody must be hacking the review scores.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
>It's not a bad movie. It's just divisive.
And if it was that's not a big deal.
>The Prequels are bad movies too!
And if it is, that's not my fault.
>A lot of people thought The Last Jedi was a good movie when it was released. I'm not a bad critic.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
>I was just subverting the audiences expectations. My review was art. I'm still not a bad critic.
And if I did, you deserved it.
>Fuck you nerds and your stupid shit.

they're using bayesian average where they account the number of voters in the score
>Calculating the Bayesian average uses the prior mean m and a constant C. C is assigned a value that is proportional to the typical data set size. The value is larger when the expected variation between data sets (within the larger population) is small. It is smaller when the data sets are expected to vary substantially from one another.
bladerunner 2049 has an adjusted score of 102%

evanmiller.org/bayesian-average-ratings.html
some further reading for whoever desires to know more
it's basically and system to calculate the average of a "thumbs down - thumbs up" system

scifi is a subgenre of fantasy

Hey hey

Ho Ho

these racist fans have got to go

Hey hey

Ho Ho

these racist fans have got to go

Star Wars is for kids. The critics loved it. Its a 10/10. Just turn off your brain.

Wtf bros I'm getting btfo by this adjustment

I am confused. What did they do with the math on this one???

YES that's where I remember this exact situation from

They seem to count number of votes as a positive.

>does it have a poc and/or a woman as main characters?
>does it deal with problems like misogyny, racism and toxic masculinity/whiteness?
>if not, reduce its rating by 50%