>2 characters talking at a time the whole movie
>every single character gets killed in a second at the end
How is this a good film?
2 characters talking at a time the whole movie
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>>every single character gets killed in a second at the end
But that's wrong
Like minus 1 and he probably just gets shot up off screen by the police
This is an OK film but Tarintino took the same premise and made it kino with Hateful Eight.
>2 characters barely talking English the whole movie
>every single character gets killed in a second at the end
How is this a film?
...
Please don't talk about something you obviously know nothing about
What do you know?
Hateful 8's big reveal moment was utterly flaccid and shitty compared to Reservoir Dogs'.
That you're clearly wrong and your reasoning is that of a middle schooler
Tarantino dialogue has its own charms. That quick messiness is a big part of that.
The chink original is superior in every way.
Wow you must be a high schooler then
so if theres no reason you and your friends couldnt have made the same movie why didnt you?
>literally to stupid for reservoir dogs
>calls others dumb
Neither of those things are implicitly bad.
Your posts make it seem like you're a tumblr high and mighty who can't use actual debate so you have to resort to insults to even reply
Numerous people die throughout the movie
Plenty of dialogue happens in the movie between more than just two people
And if those are you're arguments, you clearly don't even understand film critique
Now please kill yourself you absolute faggot
Wow you just said the opposite of of the 2 points in the OP
Good argument skills bro
That’s a video game not a film.
>imagine being this retarded
>>imagine being this retarded
Does it bother anyone Hateful Eight has ten characters?
has one man ever been so right
he totally chaached up the setting and feel
one of tarantino's biggest influences is howard hawks, and hawks' main thing is dialogue and the camaraderie between his characters. yes, there's some good action in rio bravo, but compare it to other westerns action-wise and there's a lot less. it's very dialogue heavy. all hawks' films are. even the final shootout places greater emphasis on the riffing between john wayne and the film's other characters than it does the actual gun battle.
that's because one of the things that hawks got is that people don't just watch movies for a little excitement. they also watch them to connect with the characters and build a relationship with them. you watch rio bravo, and you feel like you're actually hanging out with john wayne and dean martin, and who wouldn't want to hang out with those guys?
tarantino refers to it as a "hang out movie" for this reason, and this is a perfect description.
one of the keys to this is that the characters aren't just talking about the outlaws who are coming to break their friend out of jail or some serious life stuff. they're bullshitting. there's actually more than one scene in the movie where you see characters catch other characters up on what happened. most directors leave this stuff out because they view it as superfluous to the plot, like sleeping or using the bathroom. but hawks get that the plot is only a part of the movie. these characters are your friends, and you want to hear their "what, really?" reactions to various events.
tarantino has his flaws, but this is something he understands very well. this is one of the reasons you can watch pulp fiction or reservoir dogs countless times and never tire of them.
Snowy Cabin is way more interesting than some warehouse. Also the era H8 takes place in, music and cast is A+ while RD is a B-
I used to think this movie was the coolest shit ever.
Wrong.
It is the coolest shit ever.
>2 characters talking at a time the whole movie
youtube.com
literally the opening scene?
>2 characters talking at a time the whole movie
youtube.com
Based effort poster, your efforts are not unnoticed user
>2 characters talking at a time the whole movie
youtube.com
thanks for the spoilers jerk
It's not a film, it's a movie, and it's pretty decent given the standards of Tarantula
Literally 1992, what were you waiting for?
>every single character gets killed in a second at the end
who is mr pink?
who is mr blonde?
Pink probably gets killed by police who are literally just outside
Blonde get killed like 2 minutes prior to everyone else
tarintino is the neil degrasse tyson of film making
>2 characters talking at a time the whole movie
>He forgot the first fucking scene
Like a 2 min scene when the entire movie is based on dialogue
Also "muh tip"
Why does Tarintino love killing his characters?
It was up to the viewer's imagination, until Payday 2 came along.the heist is fun
I don't get how payday 2 affects a movie from the 90s
An annoying nigger?
Pink survived in Con Air. Don’t worry.
Thanks, user. I didn't know any of that. That's pretty cool.
>"hang out movie"
I like that...
Play the heist. It's in the same vein of the Scarface Mansion.
That’s a really good description user.
Tarantino's dialogue is shitty tho. it was good in the 90s when it was fresh because the characters were "talking about random things" but now it's very obvious it's all written by the same person. The dialogue from every single one of his movies is nearly interchangeable with one another. He takes no consideration towards chatacterization through his dialogue instead it's literally all just him. it's 100% all the rantings of QT you might hear from him at a dinner or hanging with his film geek pals.
Hateful Eight was Tarintino's WORST movie ya pinhead.
Why do so many people think this? It was the most entertaining until the last 45 minutes for me, then it became just decent.