Call me by your name

Just watched the screener of this
What should I think of it?

>no replies

how were the sex scenes

haven't seen it yet but is it about homosex

Very sensual and classy
It's erotic and artistic at the same time

The two men do fall in love, though I would say the relationship is relatable regardless of sexuality.
The whole point is the transience of something truly beautiful, and the sense of lost opportunities as humans fail to grasp the moment and instead flutter away in the stream of social expectations. Then you look back and ask, "Why didn't I?"

Very classic Merchant and Ivory, I would say.

So is the acclaim it's getting just because they're gay or is the movie actually good

is it spankbank worthy?

Agreed I loved it, it was very relatable to me

It's fucking gay

I would say yes if you're into the whole "sensual European" trope.
The film takes its time. It approaches the matter of falling in love in a way that's seldom done in cinema by showing indecisiveness and awkwardness as the main dish (instead of idealised love-upon-first-sight or tired cliche dialogues and then bed scene).

It's very /r9k/ in that sense. And gay as well.

How the fuck do I watch this? No theaters around me are showing it and I've never pirated a movie. Just let me watch some armiekino REEEEE

Seriously just search for it on a public torrent tracker site like rarbg

What do I need to use to be safe. A VPN? I've only downloaded little things here and there like songs and books

That depends on what country you're in.
If you're an Amerimutt then yes you should probably invest in a VPN.

Will do, thanks bruv

>star of david necklace

>It's another "pedowood figures bitch about the sexualization of minors and how they were bad touched as a kid episode"

>But it's okay because this is kino.10/10 movie of the year artsy shit

Hollywood's hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Also: Trying to pass Armie Hammer off as a 24 year old is Dewey Cox levels of hilarious.

wtf, you can have troubles for downloading shit? i've pirated for years and never had any problems

He's 17, he'd be legal in many US states, let alone in Italy where the age of consent is probably 13 or some shit.

Eh, even in states where it's a legal age, the cops will usually still find an excuse if you get caught. Depends on how much of a stink the parents make, really.

This. I'm not going to watch it just because I can't get with the premise visually. This seems degenerate as fuck to me and no amount of art or good storytelling is going to help me not see what looks like a grown man and an underage kid engage in sexual activity. Nice try, ___s.

Both characters are Jewish and it's one of the things they bond over. This is directly from the book.

If I wanna watch someone fuck some fruit, I'll just watch Miles Pride fuck a melon.

For real though. This is agenda-driven film making at it's finest

It's good, I was expecting a bit more but it was still a nice watch. It's nice to see a movie feature a same-sex relationship and not really be "about" homosexuality as it's moreso on the nature of experience and memory and how we contextualize it in the grand narrative of our lives. The monologue at the end was perhaps a bit too forward in how it laid out that idea but it was a touching scene nonetheless. Also I hope Sufjan gets the oscar.

Also the fact that everyone calls it a movie about gay guys despite the fact that they go out of their way to establish that Elio definitely is into chicks and that Oliver was more than likely as well is why I'm never gonna tell anyone I'm bisexual.

The difference between a 17 and 18 year old is negligible. Plus the fact that people develop both mentally and physically at different rates.

>it's a tricking the Jews into homosexuality and thus decreasing their breeding rate episode
>all these low-IQ pseudo-Sup Forumss throw a hissy hit over it, not realising how useful this is
I swear the goal of national socialism will never be won not because of the Jews but because of you lot's retardedness.

>tfw my ex left me precisely because he's bi and is tired of people saying he's gay
I miss him. I really do.

I'm sorry about that, that's a shitty thing to do, which is why I'm never gonna act on my bisexuality to prevent shitty stuff like that from happening.

Why didn't you just hook up in secret? That's the kino way to have a male on male romance.

It can happen with less popular movies.

this
give a bit of a thrill too

People would know anyway.
We never announced we were "gay" either. And people knew. I mean, who would exactly bring a "good friend" over for Christmas and let him stay for a whole week? Who would go with the same "good friend" to Rome on a holiday of a week?
If anything we were both tweed-wearing conservatives who are too "cultured" for our own good. The film Call Me By Your Name really reminded me of him because we actually did flirt over classical music (we're both pianists).

See People knew. We were very subtle already but people knew.

It’s actually good.

It opens in more theaters next weekend

If not pedo shill or willfully missing the point, the point isn't the age of the kid. The point is that Armie Hammer is 31 years old and looks every day of it.

Thankfully it’s a movie dude. So rl doesn’t matter

The other actor is 22 and 6’1.

Wtf I'm gay now

Who the fuck cares? Timothee Chalamet is 22 irl and is really not as young looking as people are pretending. In the movie they're of age and it's legal and in real life they're of age and it'd be legal.

If you're legitimately upset by this then you better be vehemently protesting every porn video with Piper Perri or Dolly Little. But I bet you don't because you don't actually care, you're just some brainwashed Sup Forumsfaggot.

I’m not even bisexual enough to have real gay sex, let along a relationship with a man. My bisexuality goes as far as porn and that’s it.

Name one (1) movie where you're okay with a guy who looks like Armie Hammer hooking up with a girl who looks like and is supposed to be 17 years old in the film.

Mind you, I haven't seen CMBYN, it might be good. I'm just trying to guess at the ground rules here.

Jews are the successors of ancient Greeks and Romans.

Best film I've seen in a long time. Cried my soyboy eyes out

Half of the golden age Hollywood films.

>Dude it's just a movie lmao

That's a half-assed rebuttal.

This. The kid looks like he could maybe be age appropriate. But I'm 25 and Armie Hammer doesn't look like any 25 year old I know. Unless he's just been doing a lot of hard living.

The end result is that it comes off, to me, as movie about a way older dude getting into a sexual tryst with someone who visibly looks at least a decade younger than him.

It'd be one thing if everyone in Hollywood didn't rail on Woody Allen's new flick and Louis CK's but this somehow gets a pass. Every critic except Armand White seems to be slobbering over this movie's proverbial cock.

The same wouldn't work for women/girls because we are culturally programmed to view the female (and her virginity) as something to be treasured until the binding act of marriage.

Men, in comparison, is expected to go on sexual trysts. Throughout various civilisations it is the men who would go on and fuck both men and women, and then settled down with a woman in a family (and still fucking both men and women outside of the marriage for fun). You don't hear about women sleeping around (or at least, not hearing it being praised) because that role devalues the woman to be a common thing, unsought and unprecious.

I'm not what you're accusing me of but even if I was, where do you think you are? I just think this film is trying to set a mainstream precedent without coming out and saying so and I find that interesting, especially in light of more recent news in the culture.

Except it works and there are films like that.

I am waiting for bluray

All the movie does is reinforce certain notions that people have about gay dudes.

>We're all molested
>We're all "taught" by an older man

Frankly, I'm tired of the boohoo forbidden romance routine or the mopey coming out movies.

I'd post that "It's all so tiresome" screencap, but the dude above already used it.

>there are films like that.
Made in an age where the female wasn't "protected" for as long as they are long (well into 18 and beyond for some cultures).

PROTIP: the whole "age of consent" concept is a very recent emergence. Look into that and you'll understand my point. IT's cultural and depends on the age.

This flick blew it's load too early as in their relathionship reached the peak midway already

Moonlight at least waited until the end to get the closure and is a far better film

>DA JOOS ARE TRYING TO TURN US INTO GAY PEDOS BY MAKING A STRAIGHTFORWARD ADAPTATION OF AN ACCLAIMED NOVEL FROM 10 YEARS AGO
>oh and I'm totally not from Sup Forums btw lol

And to answer your question, I think we are on the television and film discussion board, so I would like to discuss a legitimately well crafted film without retards derailing threads with their dumbass moralizing about a film that is actually surprisingly apolitical.

>>We're all molested
>>We're all "taught" by an older man
You seem to be projecting your own conclusions.
For a start it's the younger man who initiated the whole affair.

Watch more European films. She was 16 (her character and the actress) in this film. He was 45.

The film does literally none of that. Either you're an irredeemable brainlet or you're clearly lying about having seen it.

Most people would still say it's molestation. There's a lot of adult victims of molestation who've grown up and said they were the initiators.

I never said I saw the movie. I disagree with the movie morally and I have no desire to see it.

I've seen trailers and the peach scene and that was enough for me.

It was ok, but nowhere near the levels of good some consider it to be. I'd imagine if the film adapted the romance of a heterosexual couple it would not be as near as successful although there is a glimpse of that with his friend in the film

Oh and the hamfisted father's speech at the end was just the film's attempt to add a cherry on top and to make their relationship more meaningful

Lol that would take forever. But ok 40 year old looking Fassbender and 17 looking Mia W. In Jane Eyre.

See the movie. It’s not what you think.

Congrats, this place has degraded to the point where people are criticizing plot elements of a movie that they haven't even seen.

No, literally no one would say it's molestation because it's clearly not if you watched the fucking movie.

They'd say it's molestation in any state other than California. Or statutory rape.

Your argument is a dumb hypothetical of “buhhh cops would bust you anyway”

Also the parents in this movie accept it.
Also it’s Italy. In the 80s.

Eh it was okay-ish I suppose

really was not that interesting to look at two aristocratic males bond over their love of music and philosophy while still trying to sell the feeling of being in love.

I guess it's unfair to compare it to Moonlight since they're not similiar, but at least that movie had a great arc

Lulz. Moonlight ended with a handjob on a beach. At least this movie wasn’t ashamed of having men kiss and fuck.

We are discussing it. A film like this, in this climate, is worthy of larger discussion about social and cultural mores, especially if the film itself appears to be doing so in its casting.
>DA JOOS
First of all, being this new. Secondly, I meant what I said. No one said anything about the Jews. If you think the gay mafia can't push to get a film made in Hollywood that also delves into broader issues that occur within their community, you're mistaken.

He’d be legal regardless.

Yes. I know a lot of parents would be totally cool with some thirty year old man (Who tells everyone he's way younger like Tommy Wisseau) cornholing their kid.

Moonlight ended with them finishing what they started, the untold feelings that culminated in him all these years were finally unleashed which in itself is far more poetic that this kitsch. And it wasn't on a beach but in the diner where he worked so check again.

>At least this movie wasn’t ashamed of having men kiss and fuck.
Well if you're looking at the films as a competition of which is more daring at what it shows, then by all means resort to watching gay porn since cinema is not your thing

wtf why don't they have facial hair

I'm at the state scene now where Elio says "I know nothing about the things that matter", how does Oliver figure out that he's gay from this exchange? It's so cryptic.

Moonlight is hacky and contrived filmmaking, none of the emotional payoff is earned.

Maybe.

but still better than this farce of a "film"

This is the whole point. Comparing and contrasting between heterosexual and homosexual mores or whatever you want to call it, this user is completely right. Let's say Kevin Spacey ends up fucking Mena Suvari in American Beauty or Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson consummating their relationship in Lost in Translation. That's a completely different ROMANCE film and one that doesn't get made. Not in America anyway, not up until like yesterday.

>inb4 Pretty Baby etc

Shut the fuck up. You know what I mean.

Very brave for Hollywood to embrace a movie about a wealthy American academic going to Europe to groom a boy in between his junior and senior year of high school.

Really groundbreaking stuff.

Sounds like you’re describing one of those golden age movies that end in a discrete kiss behind the picket fence. Yes, such daring, emotionally satisfying filmmaking. Jenkins was reluctant to make his film too explicitly gay because he knew he’d lose the black audience. If you wanna see that kind of timidity as art, be my guest.
>kitsch
Yeah, bye.

>then by all means resort to watching gay porn since cinema is not your thing
Cadinot would like a word, brainlet.

Well I might be biased because Timmy is a goddamn pretty twink, but although the story is nothing groundbreaking, it's a very good spice-of-life style film if you are looking into that type of visuals.

>because he knew he's lose the black audeicne
Jesus your post reeks of "no uh um sweetie" attitude. Anyway that was a given anyway considering the black community stance of same sex relationships. And the "discrete kiss" remark is out of place or only reaffirms you have not seen the film. It was a culmination that has been building up through the film and his coming clear with his emotions. But hey if fucking a fruit or blowjob after a night together is more tonally adventorous or explicitly gay with you then by all means

At the end it doesn't really matter, both films will be forgotten in a span of few years either way

Sledgehammer-like Sufjan Stevens played over superficially pretty Italian landscapes with pretty white people crying. Sanitized and privileged, lacking a thorough examination into its subjects, hedonistic and vague. A very frustrating experience. What for gods sake were people sobbing about?

One of the problems with Moonlight that no one wants to talk about is that it's still objectifying black male bodies. Just because it's a gay film doesn't make it any better. In some ways, it's worse.

Moonlight will be forgotten, but I don't think Call Me By Your Name will.
It's more close to the ideal, and it has a timeless quality to it due to the whole setting being an idyllic Summer instead of "muh blacks".

James Ivory wrote the script as well. One would say the likes of Howard's End and A Room With A View are classics exactly because of the same reasons.

sounds like you're too lower class to empathise with the film, mate

>Moonlight will be forgotten
I doubt it.

>making excuses for Jenkins and his inability to make his gay character gay.

And it’s obvious you either haven’t seen CMBYN or are just willfully ignorant of the “culmination” that has been building up through THIS movie and the protagonist reconciling his emotions in the end- which is exactly what happens.

If you didn’t like the movie, fine. But to claim that there isn’t a clear emotional arc or call this kitsch is a weak argument.

Honestly I think some things are a bit iffy about the flick. Especially since it's Elio trying to seduce an older man and the man in question knowingly takes advantage of the situation with a minor instead of reassuring him it's a mistake and that another day will come. Point being that everybody was once young and naive and especially in love and did things that they look back upon with embaressment and yet Elio was robbed of that foolishness.

>using ‘privileged’ as a criticism

uh oh, we gotta a hothead here

It won best picture, a sure sign of oblivion

I think it depends if CMBYN receives an Oscar

Moonlight obviously received the token gay Best Picture Oscar, but the film in question is yet to see if it receives one

>trusting biscum under any circumstances
I’m sorry you hurt but you’ve brought this upon yourself

Yeah I guess you must be jewish and gay to really indulge in the flick. Silly me

>uses the words "white people," and "privileged," as an actual attempt at artistic critique

Postmodernism was a mistake.

You are forgiven. :)

What's wrong with that? I don't particularly like black people but are you implying it's racist or something to sexual objectify them? It always seems like it's damned if you do damned if you don't with the nogs.

>that pic
Still looks like a boy and a man to me. Can't unsee it.

Jesus Christ you sound like a fucking faggot

>elio not feeling regret, embarrassment
What exactly do you think is going on in the final scene? Or in the morning after they have sex?

>privileged