THAT'S MY BOY!!!

THAT'S MY BOY!!!
THAT'S MY SON!!

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

cuck

that's about the only moment that felt human in this series

that scene and the acting in it was way too good for Harry Potter, it felt weird

Actually thats the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody - just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

sonkino

>MY SON?
>MY FUCKIN' SON?

Weak lead in, apply yourself

>The way the band cuts out when they realize what happened

I'VE ABANDONED MY CHILD! I'VE ABANDONED MY CHILD! I'VE ABANDONED MY BOOOooy..

THATS MY GOY
THATS MY WIFES SON

this is just sad now
hang yourself

>the way voldemort just rolls his face over with his foot

reminds me of the way europe is currently being treated

True, and the band was playing that peppy music before anyone knew what happened. I felt that one. But I think it's pretty revealing that Harry Potter nerds tend to think this was one of the worst of the series.

Le white genocide amirite?

was this the best Potter flick?

The UN is pretty open about it

This was bad

>4th post in
>no introduction

lad

more like replacement but the end result is the same

although i still find it pretty impressive that HP managed eight movies before it jumped the shark. Star wars only managed 3.

THAT'S MY SOY

BARTY CROUCH........................................... Junior

because that was the only good scene in the movie

at least try next time

this, whites have had their day. it's are turn now.

I still like the "No!" but the lack of a intro is a detriment.

Absolute madman

Someone needs to turn this scene into a webm so this slideshow tumblr gif stops being posted

>Saw this with my Harry Potter fan gf and her little sister in the theater
>Had read the books so I brought tissues with me because I knew this shit was coming
>On cue they both start weeping
>mfw

When can we get sex robots and launch all women into the Sun bros?

Kek this is always just fun to say

I'd be happy to learn that my son was dead if I found out he was part of the dullest franchise in blah fucking blah

I still don't get why Dumbledore flipped their shit so hard over that. What's to stop Harry from just saying "No, I didn't put my goddamn name in that goblet, and I'm not participating."? Was the goblet going to kill him if he didn't?

THAT'S MY SOY!!!
THAT'S MY SILK!!

VITASOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!

I don't get why. He told Harry about putting the egg thing in water, and apologized for the pins iirc, but what else did he do to make him such a beloved character?

>What's to stop Harry from just saying "No, I didn't put my goddamn name in that goblet, and I'm not participating."

because it was a culturally binding contract or some shit like that. they cant just change the rules of a thousand-year-old tradition like its 2018

Yeah, but his name was forged, so the contract should be void. I'm obviously overanalyzing a children's story, but I'm surprised that in this world where magic can do almost anything, there's not some magical method to detect a forgery, or tell if someone is lying.

because he was a prettyboy

pointing out plotholes in harry potter, or any story that revolves around magic, is easier than shootin fish when its on a plate in front of you. its honestly best to either accept it and run with it, or just forget about it entirely

But this. You mean to say all the Weasley twins had to do was get an upperclassmen to write their name on a slip? But an aging potion wouldn't work? God dammit that's lazy

Reported for basically avatar fagging at this point. Also fuck you :^)

lol

Goblet of Fire was the only good one.

i just reported you for being a fag

>collectors set books instead of release copies
im vomiting you have no taste

Sorry, all I heard with "That's my boy!" on revisits to rewatch this movie kept making me think of the god awful animated LoZ Link meme.

Fucking memes.

Reported for reporting reporting

They were the only versions out when I bought them when I was 8

I liked it

I think it's on par with pic related in terms of dead son kino. The rest of the franchise is still lacking.

have any of you even seen the movie?
don't ever fucking post again, you hear me?

Reported for reporting reporting reporting.
Also I am Hiroshimoot himself.

But I have? I'm actually literally watching right now lmao. What are you implying, fag?

>Was the goblet going to kill him if he didn't?
Maybe? But there was nothing stopping him turning up, taking one step forward fro each task and then just saying 'i forfeit'

You could also waste the death eaters with a machine gun.

>that battle in the Ministry of Magic between Voldemort and Dumbledore

The series wasn't perfect but it had its moments. I liked the first four films more than what came after, desu. There was a different vibe that was totally destroyed by the new director.

As someone in law school now, after re-watching the movie, I can safely say that living in the wizard world would be the most dangerous place to live and things such as personal liberties and property rights would always be at risk.

>moot
Who?

...

You could also not have autism, but here we are.

touché

Sleep well, little user.

I can't even imagine my father reacting anything like this to my dead body, which is just depressing.

One time I was watching this with some friends. I knew this scene was coming so I said I'll go to the bathroom real quick.
Come back and they've paused it.
Then I had to swallow my bitch tears while he cried over his boy's body.

C'mon you can do better than this, you once had potential but now? Who hurted you potterposter?

CHINESE FIREBALL OHHOHOOOO

That Barty, such a jokester. King of the stitch ups.

I don't get the negative comments, it was basically
>>that's my boy!
>>that's my son!
>no that's just the dullest franchise

which is a good segue from OP's post. As far as the copypasta goes there have been much worse introductions in the past.

HOWEVER

Chinese fireball.....uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Can I just say, I'm happy that this thread has gotten as many replies as it has without the dullest copypasta (or whats worse, the cunts who reply to it) I'm all for gags, but sometimes, I feel like the pasta is deliberately designed do derail dhreads dnd dhat dust ducks de doff

This reaction seems more justified to me thank book version.

It's heavily implied that the goblet is impossible to trick.

Harry either did it himself and it gliched or dark magics was afoot

WHAT WAS THAT BOY?

Being different from the book doesn't make it bad. Especially not when the book is shit to begin with.

>right now
Kill yourself for posting on Sup Forums while "watching" a movie

But why would Dumbledore care? Hes been shown to always be chill as fuck even in the face of really bad shit but someone tricks a stupid tournament and he flips his shit? Its insanely out of character for him and he never acts like that again.
GOF deserves all the hate it gets, its easily the worst directed film of the series.

>go see this at cinemas
>scene happens
>entire theater is dead quiet
>I burst into laughter because the overacting amuses me
>mfw everybody is exiting the theater and I'm waiting for credits end
What is it about forced emotional scenes that makes me laugh?

harry clearly didn't do it himself because he's pretty shit he needs saving constantly so obviously dumbledore figured someone else is fucking around but I agree it was justified this meme about him running that even pewdiepie has covered is already dead

Id be dissapointed too if my son was a part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody - just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though

"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Because this is one of the first time Dumbledore doesn't know whats going on.

Hes so chill because 99% of situations hes in he knows whats going on and that he can handle it

Amos Diggery was sad to be left alone in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

He was a friendly chad, and the virgin he helped ended up getting him killed

What movie?

This, it's the first time things were not keikaku and shit rapidly goes south from there over the next couple of books

I always felt that the disconnect between the acting and the story never making any effort to make us care about what's happening in this scene to be pretty jarring.

Goblet of Fire

Posting tumblr gifs should be bannable

>"DEH!"

I stopped watching after 5, did I miss anything

kek

A terribly boring 6 that looks like it was shot inside Hagrid's anus, a boring fillerific as fuck 7 and an alright 8. All raped the source material.

>naming a 14 year old dead girl "moaning Myrtle"
HOW the FUCK did they get away with this

Why this nigga dropping beats

Why he not conquering the wizarding world

Why this nigga look like albino potato

gotta love barty crouch sr parenting

>absolute madman who is desperate accuses your son of being a wizard nazi

>no evidence at all

>immediately denounces his only son

the fact that this pasta came so long after the op tell a lot about the absolute STATE of tv

Somebody killed somebody else, that's all that I remember.

I don't mind 7 as much, when you watch it back-to-back with 8, kind of like the two Kill Bill movies.

No, it was posted before and got deleted

It was posted before you stupid dumb fuck.