Convince me this wasn't aimless garbage, Sup Forums.
Convince me this wasn't aimless garbage, Sup Forums
Congratulations. You're one of those they're rightfully making fun of. You just outed yourself, pardner.
i live in missouri, should i watch this one or will it offend me?
Signalling: The Movie
This Is What An Important Prestige Film Looks Like: The Movie
This guy. This guy, right here. He's fucking gone. G-O-N-E. He's out. Kaput. Sayofuckingnara. And why? Because I'm sick of this fucking shit. I'm even going to sit things out over the next three days after I'm inevitably turfed myself because I announced a report. I know the rules. I'll be a good little goy and play by them, too.
This cunt, though? FUCK YOU. Whether you play by the rules or not, FUCK YOU. If a mod's here? Like, genuinely here watching this? I'd love if you (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) this cunt for being such a fuckwit and ruining threads like this. Oh and if you think I'm some fucking tourist from you-know-where and being a "soyboy" or whatever stupid shit you're going to pull, know that I've been here since 2009 and I'm goddamn sick of it. I'm sick of these phoneposting cunts, ALL of them.
It was aimless garbage.
WOW. Francis McDormand?! Woody Harrelson?! Desolate Americana? I can just tell this movie is REALLY GOOD
Unironically more compelling than this flick.
Where at senpai, I need a kinobuddy.
I live in the country, outside KC.
It doesn’t make fun of southerners if that’s what you’re getting at. There is a ridiculously racist cop in it and plenty of yaas queen moments. It’s just not that good overall.
It was entertaining; I'd say aimless but not garbage.
Ah, damn. I’m in Jeff.
Suppose I could agree with this, I had fun watching it. Just wish it went somewhere.
It will offend you, dude who made it is a brit.
I feel it was aimless, overall. The film was certainly mean-spirited, I'm sorry to say. McDonagh is trying to play both sides of the race hustling game and made indecent rubbish as a result.
It felt like he didn't know what he was trying to say.
By [McDormand's] own logic, her family and friends deserve the treatment they receive due to their association with herself. I don't understand the point, it seems like in the end they were ALL in the wrong, except for the ad agency boy who demonstrated genuine compassion.
I didn't understand the "dishonest filmmaking" meme until I saw 3 Billboards.
>I shouldn’t expose myself to things that make my asshole clench
You’re a pathetic faggot.
SPOILER
Its script and tone were all over the place.
The billboards were put up to avoid the murder being forgotten and to help the investigations keep going?
Too bad apparently noone had forgotten about the case and the investigations didn't had a significant turn becaise of it
The cancer plot was for us to sympathize more with the chief?
Too bad he wasn't the one we disliked to begin with.
Was there to let McDormand charachter have some moral conundrum?
She didn't give a shit.
Same thing for his suicide.
It seems like the idea was that, even if it happened for unrelated reasons, the suicide was put in the film to create struggle both in the charachter and in the city.
Too bad we see just glimpses of that (the threatening display of a cunt that we discover is an asshole anyway and is not even from the city!) and the movie immediately focuses on other things!
What was the point of her black friend going to prison? It was just a one off scene.
What was the point of her son scenes about his disapproval of the three billboards?
Oh my god, what was the fucking point of the priest scene? Just to take a jab at the church?
Also this movie was cheesy as fuck in its dramatic moments. It had like 5 monologues in it and they were bland as fuck. Oh no, you're a good man but you have daddy issues. Fuck off.
Also all the comedy fell flat.
Also the cinematography was uninspires.
Also overacting.
Also the music sucked.
There was one tense scene in it, the Dickson's assault to the ginger, and it led nowhere. The next scene he was laughing about it in the station.
I can't
Only good part was when Dickson threw the ginger out the window. That scene was pure kino
Also the CGI deer during THE DRAMATIC MOMENT.
The scene were you lead charachter pours out her heart and you see all her pain and vulnerability.
And she does this to a CGI DEER.
Lmao.
On the big screen it was so off putting. I laughed so hard
>i should just let some faggot fuck me in the ass
Literal cuck
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT THAT WAS SO STUPID
all I could think about was TWD, it looked about as bad.
I know.
I really wish Sup Forums would rip more on this movie, because it was so blatantly bad and memeworthy.
Did this piece of shit win any globes? Is it going to the Oscars? It's so bad
I liked it, but I took the film as more of a cautionary tale of how you can’t allow tragedy to poison yourself.
I’d like to think that both McDormand and Rockwell became serial killer vigilantes trying to get those damn rapists and then proceeded to get arrested for doing so.
It won best picture (drama). I don't think it will win best pic at the Oscars, if so it's really just 2018's "Crash" imo
Is Phantom Thread not eligible for the Oscars? I would think a PTA movie would be the biggest shoe in especially with Daniel Day Lewis.
>I’d like to think that both McDormand and Rockwell became serial killer vigilantes trying to get those damn rapists and then proceeded to get arrested for doing so.
The "I'm not so sure" ending, was at least good.
Because both McDormand and Rockwell charachter arc was that they were hateful persons because of personal tragedies and had to overcome this, and the vigilante end almost shit on all of this.
For a second I went "Oh so they learned nothing?"
I don't know, after the CGI deer scene I could no longer tell if I was laughing at it or with it
But what's cautionary about it?
Similarly, did they learn anything? What did she learn from putting up the billboard? Was she glad she did, or does she regret it? They ultimately did not achieve what she set out for them to do.
It should be eligible but hasn't been out long enough to generate buzz. Same with hostiles, I think Rosamund Pike may be due for an award.
>Also all the comedy fell flat
This was my biggest issue with it but this is my issue with most movies. The scenes with the ex husband's 19 year old girlfriend are some of the most misplaced scenes I have ever seen. They feel like they implanted a scene from The Office into the movie. I mean, it's only two scenes, but they're totally baffling.
I dunno I don’t take it as much that they learned something as much as they were fundamentally broken individuals who lashed out at the world to try to make sense of things.
Dormand’s character is a fucking bitter cunt, she destroyed the relationship with her living son in this quest for revenge. Rockwell is a fucking retard who thought life worked like a comic book.
Let’s be honest for Rockwell’s character there was nothing left for his life after losing his job and getting gravely disfigured, if he couldn’t be a vigilante well then all he’s got left is alcohol and porn.
McDormand was channeling John Wayne in her performance, and I think she’s likewise doomed like Wayne was in The Searchers.
>But what's cautionary about it?
Don’t destroy yourself seeking justice. Sometimes absolute horror will fall on you and the one you love and of course try to bring them to justice if possible but if the trail goes cold you have to move on.
My father was murdered a decade ago by a motherfucker who (probably) still walks the earth, believe me I’ve had fantasies of tying up the son of a bitch and imitating Mr. Blonde from Reservoir Dogs. But am I going to risk destroying my own life to avenge as if I’m the fucking Punisher? Of course not. Such dreams need to stay dreams. Your dead family wants you to live happy and prosper not destroy.
There’s a reason we don’t allow vigilantism, because while it comes from an understandable place someone’s bloodlust will cloud judgement and they’ll make terrible mistakes. McDormand comes off as sensible and “badass” for the first act and then commits arson for no reason. Why? Because she’s went nuts.
The only sensible characters in the movie are the teenager son and the ex-husband.
She came off as irrational in the first act but I admired her spirit. I wanted her cause to succeed, I wanted her character to experience some sort of emotional catharsis. I appreciate the horrible situation she went through but when she indulges herself so criminally, it's hard to feel much empathy. In the end her crusade failed and I don't really care. I suppose I do like that by the end she didn't either, but I can't help but feel unsatisfied that that's where it leaves us. All thst drama for a flippant shrug of the shoulders.
Also your story sounds infuriating user, I admire your restraint and maturity regarding the situation.
The guy who made it is such a hack, made a career making Tarantino knock offs and now he's doing Coen bros knock offs with liberal faggotry and without the skill. His brother is the one the should get the attention since he actually makes good films.
Oh, it was.
what did that guy post?
>Film has positive African american views
Sup Forums's fw
That fucking CGI deer was so fucking funny
Did it? Again what was the fucking point? There was no need for a racial angle to be taken, not even Rockwells arc was entirely dependent on it. I'm glad there were black characters who were good/important but what point was that trying to make? Seemed like pandering/posturing.
This. The comedy was UNBEARABLE, dont understand how this got a pass but every marvel movie gets shit since they both had the same quality jokes...and same frequency. There was a joke every fucking 5 mins.
This.
But every black person was there to serve a white person. The black lady got freed and her first destination was to the white women who works for her:
>what
The comedy definitely felt marvelesque.
>Begets? Did she really say that?
felt like
>Why would we be the gardens of the galaxy