Found this incredibly overrated and dull. Was more of a straight to TV movie if anything

Found this incredibly overrated and dull. Was more of a straight to TV movie if anything.

Why is that the more pretentious and boring a movie is, the more people stumble over themselves to pretend they loved it so they appear intellectual?

...

>bongflick about running away
>we wuz heros n sheeeit
If it wasn't for the US you bongcucks would have been crushed by the nazies. Thanks to the USA there's FREEDOM in the world.

try being more subtle when false flagging.

"Boring" is not a valid argument, it only says what your mood was while watching the film.
Same as saying "it was fun", that does not indicate anything about the actual quality of the film whatsoever

Yeah Dunkirk was totally like a "straight to TV" movie right user, movies like that are played everyday on the television am i rite

Dumb brainlet casual

I really hated it. Boring, uninspired. All the acting was dull. It was so dull. Even on a technical level, I'm talking about aesthetics, imagery, etc. NOTHING. absolutely nothing stood out to me. Everything about it sucked

>this is what eyelets actually believe

"Boring" is not a valid argument, it only says what your mood was while watching the film.
Same as saying "it was fun", that does not indicate anything about the actual quality of the film whatsoever

spot the yanks

The movie was fun and kino

I liked it.

fite me

It was such a boring shit movie, the only thing sold it, was Nolan's name. I fell asleep 3 times.

No real plot and no character development. Visually was nice but the movie just panned over the same three things - the plane, the boat, and the beach. I could have cared less if any of the characters died because they weren't developed enough for me to give a shit. Also, the lack of accuracy of the German bombers didn't really build any suspense...

"Boring" is not a valid argument, it only says what your mood was while watching the film.
Same as saying "it was fun", that does not indicate anything about the actual quality of the film whatsoever

>No real plot
There is something happening from the first frame right up until the last one.
>no character development
Not all films are character driven.

It had almost no story arch and a lot of nameless characters I didn't really care about.
Sure it looked nice, but I was emotionally flatlining for the length of the flick.
Really don't understand how this movie is so highly rated.

It's funny how the opinion on this film drastically changes on this board as soon as the ameriturds come home from wageslaving.

>120 million budget
There was 5 planes, 15 ships and couple hundred soldiers in total.
Just for comparison during the real evaluation at some point there were as much as
300.000+ soldiers on one beach from total approximately 400.000 souls
they evacuated exactly 338.226 guys. What we saw on the screen was no more than 200 guys staying in the queue.

Why they didn't show how 3500 brits literally sacrificed their lives and defend the lines to
the last breath to help evacuated as many guys from the beach as possible?
Why they showed in entire movie dogfights of just 4 planes when during the real deal there
was almost 300 aircrafts in the sky brits lost close to 100 aircrafts and Germans 156?
And the best why the heck showed just 12 British civilian boats which sailed from Ramsgate and
arrived to Dunkirk help with evacuation if in real there were more than 850 civilian vessels?

This whole movie is a joke and disgrace for anyone who's grandfather's lost their lives...

I still don't 'get' Dunkirk. It's like a cold, heartless documentary. My expectations of war films involve some soul and character development. Dunkirk really had none of that.

It’s like Planet Earth but about War. It’s a new kind of movie almost

Did you just read off the fucking wikipedia page you dumbfuck? Did you forget the part that all those numbers are numbers in TOTAL, with the entire battle lasting approximately 9 days, not one hour?

And the Dunkirk beach is more than 10 miles long, it's not like all 400 thousand men were standing in a single spot like sardines for the 9 days.
It's not like all the 900 cilivian boats came at the same exact second on the exactly the same spot of the 10 mile long beach, same with the 40 Destroyers, only a strategic moron would do that. Do you really think 40 Destroyers went at the same damn time, I mean what the fuck would they even do just sit and wait to get torpedoed while a single Destroyer is being boarded?
Same with the Spitfires, like I said it's safe to say that during an hour time which the air narrative takes place in that only 3 or 4 Spitfires were in air during that entire week, there was never a point in the entire Dunkirk battle where there were 50 Spitfires vs 50 Stukas or anything like that.

Unless you wanted a historically inaccurate fairy tale americanised flick where a whole armada of thousands of boats coming at the same exact same second just so the viewer goes "woah epic so many"

Brainless wikipedia fags are the worst

This. I'm genuinely confused by people calling it boring. It was very intense and emotional

The soldiers on the beach felt like fucking robots, some of them even stand in the water when there isnt even a boat in sight. The beach just felt like it was shot at a current modern bath place. In the beginning you can even see a modern bench right on the beach. And everything is too clean. The whole movie just felt off. Worst nolan movie

It's literally the best Nolan film since Memento

this movie was cringe-core

>DUDE ONE SHOT LOOKS ACCURATE TO ONE PICTURE THEREFORE 100% ACCURATE

The movie portrays almost zero fighting, when in reality it was practically constant bombardment and fighting and the reason the germans didn't just wipe them all out is because they couldn't, because you simply can't wipe out a nation's entire military when it's concentrated at a single point. As just about the entire royal navy was there, constantly engaged, just about the entire RAF was in the air, constantly engaged, artillery was constantly firing to prevent the germans from setting up within range of the evacuation, and the army was constantly engaged to prevent the germans from rolling in.

But the movie? Silent beach, people standing silently, waiting, no fighting, a grand total of one actual air engagement over dunkirk, no naval battles, nothing.

The most significant thing the germans are shown doing is dropping leaflets.

nolancucks btfo

>The movie portrays almost zero fighting, when in reality it was practically constant bombardment and fighting
Factully wrong, if there was constant bombardment there wouldn't be such a (relatively) small amount of casualties. Stuka raids were often, but just like in the film, maybe 2 or 3 at once not more. All the "fighting" was held by the french holding off the perimeter, but this film isn't about that, it's about the survival of british soldiers on that beach specifically.
>As just about the entire royal navy was there
Are you forgetting the fact that the navy had to literally get civilian ships because they were so desperate? 40 Destroyers were used, that's about 4 Destroyers per day.
>just about the entire RAF was in the air
Factually wrong, there's a book by one of the spitfire aces who flew during ww2 with an entire chapter dedicated to 'Where was the RAF at Dunkirk?'. tl;dr they were busy elsewhere and you're a ignorant wikifag, Dunkirk was not the only event happening in the war at that time.
>artillery was constantly firing to prevent the germans from setting up within range of the evacuation
Again imaginary headcanon, there was no constant artillery, the vast majority of soldiers on that beach was entirelly helpless
>and the army was constantly engaged to prevent the germans from rolling in.
The french army, and this film is not about that.
>Silent beach, people standing silently, waiting, no fighting, a grand total of one actual air engagement over dunkirk, no naval battles, nothing.
That's how it happened, who would you fight on the fucking beach? And the air narrative follows a single hour of the battle, again retarded arguments.

Embarassing headcanon points my man.

it was boring as shit

"Boring" is not a valid argument, it only says what your mood was while watching the film.
Same as saying "it was fun", that does not indicate anything about the actual quality of the film whatsoever