LOL

LOL

Other urls found in this thread:

sandraandwoo.com/2015/09/21/0720-diamonds-are-a-presidents-best-friend/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Anyone else think this cartoon is pretentious as fuck with some of the strips?

they have a good setup for a joke, and yet they went for the blatant decade old obvious one

god i hate this comic i'm not gonna tell ya why but i figured i would let ya'll know

Anyone else never get the sex talk? I just found a book on my bed one day. Went into sexual assault and uncles diddling their nephews too though. Kind of strange in retrospect.

>Anyone else never get the sex talk?
nope, didn't even get a book. But in my country there is sex-ed starting sixth grade, so almost okay.
I just never learned to jack off until a bully told me how to do it. He was trying to embarrass me, but he helped me out

I don't remember ever having one. I was mostly raised by my grandma, so imagine how emotionally scarring that one would have been.

>pretentious as fuck


Reminder that

> addressing child abuse image proliferation = corporations want to jail people for money

was actually peddled by this comic

sandraandwoo.com/2015/09/21/0720-diamonds-are-a-presidents-best-friend/

> Even the comments call the artist out on it

I mean, aren't drug related incarcirations an easier and less creepy target for this sort of thing?

>47 million Americans
what

When it comes to drugs, the US still has a country wide ban. With the new studies coming out on how drugs have negative effects on the brain, the ban looks to be strengthened.


The artist implied that child abusers shouldn't get jail time because muh corporation.

If I remember correctly, main character under 16 took a topless pic for her boyfriend, accidentally sent to everyone, everyone using notSnapchat who saw it got arrested. All 47 million of them I guess.

>Anyone else never get the sex talk?
Me!
Or maybe that time when my mom explained me that girls had periods.

>now every time I nut
>I breathe deeply and reflect on that exchange
>and I airlessly whisper "thank you"

Sex-ed and late night "the anatomy of sex" on The Learning Channel, back when it was about learning, was good enough for me.

But wait, they're not kiddy diddlers. They got sent child porn that they didn't want and had no idea they'd get. It's like getting arrested for some rando blowing cocaine into your face.

>But wait, they're not kiddy diddlers.
No one's saying they are.
On a separate note, possession has its penalties.


>They got sent child porn that they didn't want and had no idea they'd get. It's like getting arrested for some rando blowing cocaine into your face.
The argument presented in implies that vigilance against child abuse is a plot of for-profit private prisons to get money.
That's why there are investigations: hey, you got coke on your face and you say someone else blew it on you. Well, let's see if your story checks out over at the station.

Quick summary, this is only really basic, consult a lawyer for legal advice.

America has two types of laws, "reasonable intent" & "intent doesn't matter". Let's assume you are at a bar and a girl sits next to you, gets carded when she orders and before she gets her drink, and she decides to talk to you. You hit it off and you rail her in the bathroom. it turns out she was 17. Under American law you have raped a minor, even though by the fact she had ID stating she was over 21 and you reasonably didn't mean to fuck a minor, it didn't matter you broke the law,

Now let's assume you were hired to push a button, and later it turns out that every button push killed someone. Legally it was reasonable to assume that pushing the button wasn't committing a felon, you are not guilty.

CP falls under "it doesn't matter". If someone puts a naughty picture in your back pocket and the cops bust you, jail time. It's why the NSA/CIA backdoors in every bodies computers is so scary, they could download some CP onto your computer and you would never know.

Interesting. Australia has a similar thing, crimes can be be trialed under civil cases (guilt is determined on the balance of probabilities) and criminal cases (guilt must be established beyond all reasonable doubt).

Oh no, we have that here too. Criminal requires proof beyond reasonable doubt and civil requires more likely than not. We just also have some laws were intent matters and some where it doesn't.

>It's why the NSA/CIA backdoors in every bodies computers is so scary, they could download some CP onto your computer and you would never know.

I'll take "Things that have never happened" for $ 200, Alex.

They know they'll be in deep trouble if they ever get caught planting evidence. They won't do this nightmare scenario since it would backfire so much.

> "We need net neutrality to prevent internet service providers from doing something they have never done because they know the backlash it will have."

Doesn't intent never matter, technically speaking.
Like, on paper, the court doesn't care why you did something just that if did or didn't do it?

In practice yeah the courts are much more forgiving but if you get a bad judge and jury then it's strictly what you did or didn't do?

Why can't you just give your kid a book and let them figure out the rest.

It's especially weird because for many reasons, the disproportionate punishment and outrage over possession of CP is worse for actual victims of child abuse for a number of reasons (among others, because all studies on the subject show that restricting porn leads to increase of real life sex crimes). Lobbyists however, love to use CP to piggiback legislation they want, because everyone knows CP is the super devil.

Nope, I had a great book and a decent sex-ed class, add to that the internet to answer any other questions.

Who says "for zero dollars"?
Why wouldn't they say "for free"?

I didn't, but I got a weird "you need to pull back your foreskin and wash it" talk from my single mother even though I already knew that.

Your faith in the US government's integrity is both admirable and naive. They break laws all the time.

Depends. A lot of crimes why you did it are really important, especially in terms of sentencing and crime committed. A murder in the heat of passion is sentenced less harshly than a pre planned murder. Running someone over is manslaughter or murder depending if you just weren't paying attention and hit a jaywalker while switching lanes versus switching lanes to hit a jaywalker. It's what half of reasonable doubt is, the why you did it. Of course some crimes, usually "moral" crimes, intent doesn't matter. Take for instant "distribution" charges in drugs offenses. A lot of the sizes used to be for what a user would typically consume in one to a few sittings, but it doesn't matter you plan to use it through out the week you will face punishment for intent to distribute and can't argue that fact.

I never had a sex talk. My childhood and teen years were basically Moral Orel, so yeah.

>With the new studies coming out on how drugs have negative effects on the brain, the ban looks to be strengthened.
What? Studies funded by the alcohol industry and TV evangelists?

While it is farfetched, you have to remember that you're talking about the country that allowed the sale of Israeli firearms to Iran against a weapon trade ban they put into the UN themselves and had the CIA sell crack cocaine to fuckloads of gangs on the East-Coast so they could fund extreme-right deathsquads in South America with 'untraceable' funds because they by law couldn't use tax money to fund the death squads.

Eazy E from the NWA literally got his music career started by selling crack cocaine for the CIA, and he later on became a member of the Republican party and even visited G.W. Bush senior on a Republican fundraiser.

Bullshit, it's addressing teenagers getting jailed for sexting, which is a uniquely retarded thing you guys do

Why is she getting this talk now? Her friend is enough of a complete slut that they should have given her this talk years ago.

He's going to have the friend show her through example.

>zero-tolerance laws that get kids arrested for taking pictures of themselves is "vigilance against child abuse"
You're a moron

It's not uniquely American. Happens all over the world.

Wow, you're a fucking retard.

Juries are capable of exerting personal judgement but it is rare and heavily discouraged. In fact, judges and attorneys work very hard to ensure the jury is NOT aware that they are within their rights to declare someone who is clearly guilty as innocent if they believe the punishment is undeserved

The letter of the law is simple possession regardless of circumstance. A 15 year old who snaps a dick pic is in possession of child pornography

Someone pushing for heavier enforcement and sentencing for this is absolutely trying to increase incarceration for private prison kickbacks the same as someone pushing for heavier drug laws

Isn't this about teens getting in trouble for having pics of other teens

I got lots of educational books about the human body anatomy, or how child birthing worked (including ones that had detailed pictures of birth), so I didn't really need any talk. Look up "Per, Ida och Minimum" on google, that was one of the books - can't post it here because, despite it being a childrens book, it is technically not safe for work.

However I never knew what an orgasm is, just that sex feels really exciting. Then one day I imitated jerking off from a porn comic and boy was I surprised.

Because she may have done something that got an uproar because of its sexual nature, so the parents are making sure she's aware of the full implications of her actions.

This is not to say that she *needs* a talk, but as a parent, you'd have to make sure - assuming she ever had a talk to begin with.

>Watched porn all the time when I was like 12 or so
>Never knew about deleting my history
>Stepdad finds out one day
>Mom and stepdad explain to me that women aren't only for sex, bla bla bla
>'Okay but can I go play world of warcraft on the computer now'
>'no'

i never got anything, like no book or conversations at all
it's probably because my father hates awkward conversations and my mother couldn't give a shit

I'm curious. What would really happen if this same incident really happened, if every person in America got this image sent to them?

>my childhood and teen years were basically moral orel
user please tell me your dad never took you on a hunting trip

Nope, just older cousins

My school covered it, and thank God for that.

The horror.
THE HORROR!!!

What would you have done differently?