Is the exclusion of less and less attractive women in TV and cinema these days intentional?

Is the exclusion of less and less attractive women in TV and cinema these days intentional?

For me? It's Colin Quinn!

>exclusion of less and less attractive women
Yes, nobody wants to see less attractive people instead of more attractive ones.

I meant exclusion of attractive women

It's called diversity, darling

They think sexuality and what people find atttactive is based off of social engineering and by showing you uggos people will tear down the walls of conventional attraction to make you breed with the ugly, unhealthy, poor gene ridden members of society while they hoard the good, healthy individuals to themselves.

keked

I find it interesting. On the one hand I like seeing pretty faces in some escapism flicks. On the other, it's nice seeing people who look like real people you see in your life, in movies. I embrace that. Because Hollywood is all make believe and bullshit mindwashing so it's nice to see that this SJW backlash has at least given us a few normal looking or even ugly looking heroes.

What if I want to see more attractive women but with unshaved pits, arms, legs and pusies?

fatties and uggos are meant for television.

>Is the exclusion of less and less attractive women in TV and cinema these days intentional?
yes, part of the jew sjw agenda

That is called porn user

TV is about real people doing real things take your fantasies to porn

but thats not what you said

2>4>3>1

real people don't have hairy body parts????

not women it is a defacto rule that they must not be hairy, only mentally ill degenerate women know as femenist and sjw do not shave

2, 3, 1, 4

women didnt used to shave before modern age tho

>what are the Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians

gay?

You fucking dyslexic cunt.

>mfw porn and reality are indistinguishable

they look like they fuck black guys

GIRLS

White standards of beauty are a component of white supremacy.

>This is your brain on IR porn