NOBODY KNOWS THE TROUBLE I'VE SEEN

NOBODY KNOWS THE TROUBLE I'VE SEEN

>Its making less than RO did in week 5

OH NO NO NO NO NO

I WISH THAT I COULD TURN BACK THE TIME

>can’t read graph
This is relative to what they made on the opening week retard, it’s percentages, not dollars, TLJ made a lot more than R1, im not even defending it, it’s shit, but youre stupid

>makes around 90% of what TFA did during the first three days
>is currently averaging just 56% of what TFA did during the same days

>dub hitler dubs
>le 56%

What

True, however it has been making less than Rogue One over the last two weeks.

OH NO NO NO NO NO

>youre stupid

I still have not seen it.
First star wars movie I've didn't watch in theaters aside from the original trilogy which I burned up on VHS.

Sad what they did to Star Wars but it is what it is. There is no going back. Hyper Space ramming.. jesus christ. It might be 'for' children but it shouldn't be ran by children.

The drop is what is bad dude. They could have made 2 billion in gross but with the drop from first week to the second, it was because people did not like it.
After Solo.. will anyone trust a Star Wars movie again?

What the fuck is with the percentage axis? 100%, 10% and 1%? Why is it fucking logarithmic? Who made this? Are you stupid?

It would actually be clear if it was increments of 10% but this is an intentionally biased chart

>intentionally biased chart

>not knowing what logarithmic charts are for
With the drop off you can't see the difference between individual lines after week 2.

this chart is very misleading. It makes it look like the difference between TFA and TLJ is really small when in fact 1/3 of the audience who saw TFA didn't see TLJ.

1/3 of the domestic audience: gone.

Sorry if I'm a brainlet, but why are the trends so similar? Do movies typically have those "bumps" at predictable intervals.

It's logarithmic, which is a legitimate way of displaying a graph, but it is annoying when you're expecting linear.

>his chart is very misleading. It makes it look like the difference between TFA and TLJ is really small when in fact 1/3 of the audience who saw TFA didn't see TLJ
only if you are a complete retard

>Sorry if I'm a brainlet, but why are the trends so similar? Do movies typically have those "bumps" at predictable intervals.
I would assume those are Fridays and weekends
hard to say without the fucking x axis labeled

>After Solo.. will anyone trust a Star Wars movie again
They said the same thing about episode 1

All three movies were released on thursdays, so those are weekends. The random dips on the left side are Christmas Day.

And Attack of the Clones was the worst-performing Star Wars movie.

>With the drop off you can't see the difference between individual lines after week 2.

For week 3 TFA looks like 55%, R1 maybe 60%,
but TLJ is down to 20-30%. The lines would absolutely be distinguishable with increments of 10%.

>using literally half your graph for numeric territory that is barely breached

wtf

And Revenge of the sith was the best one so by that logic episode 9 would be the best one.

>And Attack of the Clones was the worst-performing Star Wars movie.
Before TLJ, who's holds are even less than that.

So she's a baritone.

Revenge of the Sith performed better than Attack but worse than TPM and about the same adjusted as Rogue One

>fucking logarithmic
>It's logarithmic

thanks