If you act like my enemy, you become my enemy

>if you act like my enemy, you become my enemy
what did he mean by this?

why are all the elves mexican?

>I was just pretending to be retarded

>The Elf is immunized against all dangers. Call him a knife-ear, forest twink, drow, it all runs off him like mithril off a sword. But call him an Elf and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injures he is, how he suddenly shrinks back; “I’ve been found out.”

-Jirak, 2,067 B.C.

>the enemy of my enemy's enemy is my friend's friend
profound

>>if you act like an antielfita, you're a nazi

Was that big redhead guy with him supposed to be this world's dwarf?

Be honest. How many of you think you are this guy.

I'm not mexican

just an ass kissing human

6deep12me

muh diversity
I guess it's better than nigger elves

Nothing because it was written poorly but still fun desu

>If you're my enemy you're my enemy
Too fucking deep, yo.

Underrated

If you act like my enemy, you'd be in one of the most dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>"a-at least the books were good though"

NO! The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>he thinks this is a Harry Potter thread
embarrassing

wrong thread user

LAME

Elves are supposed to be the ancient ones.
California was owned by Mexico before the US. It was always spic land.

delet

That hes a knife ear cunt