Fell asleep 20 mins in

Fell asleep 20 mins in.

I fell asleep 15 minutes in.

you needed to watch it to find that out?

>Streep
Into the trash it goes

Who's Streep Hanks? Never heard of him.

oscar b8: the flick

this has to be the most arrogant movie poster

actor´s names are bigger than the movies name and the actors figures.

the poster is saying
>"psst hey STREEP and HANKS FAGGOT!! WHO CARES ABOUT THE STORY ITS A SPIELBERG FILM ANYWAYS IT HAS TO BE GOOD, BUT MOSTLY SSSSTREEEEEP AAAAAND HAAAAANKKKSSS
thats it faggit, gtfo now"

Propaganda.

The Washington Post is fake news now.

more like Meryl Sleep amirite zzzzzzz

...

come on is the movie that bad ?

The first 10 minutes was intriguing but then Meryl Streep opened her mouth and next thing I knew the film had been over for three hours.

>come on is the movie that bad ?
No, it's Sup Forumstard teenagers that shit on Meryl Streep because the orange retard told them she's overrated.

It's a slow burn drama with a complex plot so it's a pleb filter.

...

me too bitch the fuck

>movie about a newspaper
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Fuck off, Jew

Slow burn drama ≠ zero interesting dialogue.

>a movie about how newspapers used to subvert government strong arming by revealing the truth against all odds
>this movie distracts from the fact that WP is now a gossip rag owned by the worlds wealthiest man in an attempt at slandering the president out of office because he intends to end globalist tyrannical communism

You should know that Hanks and Streep are both hand picked for the role because they too are globalist kiddie fuckers

no, it's pretty good and possibly great if you're kinda ignorant to the whole situation with Vietnam/Nixon, it's pretty true to the novel ,which obviously more in depth, but it still keeps the basic frame of what happened.

>globalist tyrannical communism

>movie is bad
>/tvpol/ automatically assumes it's bad because of some retarded "Jewish commie conspiracy".

You're assuming that the Sup Forums retards actually watched the movie. I think they just saw Streep's name and Washington Post and got triggered.

I don't watch propaganda.

Triumph of the Will was a good movie

Only bad part was hanks smoking. Looked hella unnatural like he's never done it

>u need da paper

Movies cant be criticized as boring, because if that's your best argument at best case you just have ADHD.
The problems with both this and other Oscar bait tier movies are highly consistent, in general
>Completely basic cinematography, but shot on such high end cameras that it actually gets on your nerves that they dont do anything exciting with them
>Famous lead actors that cant shine even if they could because they are passive characters since most safe dramas are overglorified books
>Safe directing and screenplay, for a drama ofcourse
>Barely any editing;now dont forget this is still a drama so you cant edit like its your action flick but there have been many dramas (like the superb Walkabout) where the editing is top notch and never takes away from the natural flow of the movie
>Soundtrack is literal background music except for maybe one or two scenes
And ofcourse
>The themes of the movie are so sterilized for award season that they interest virtually noone except the people paying for it
that's why these movies are shit, not because they're boring

>globalist tyrannical communism

>Streep
>Spielberg

How convenient it's on a members area so no one can validate
Also convenient there is no members area link, or login link

its a movie for boomers who still read the newspaper

so in other words, boring?

literally everything you just said correlates to the statement "it was boring" you pretentious retard

You cant classify something as boring without breaking it up to why it is or feels boring
Some people think LotR are boring, I dont
I think this was boring, someone might not.
Boring is a very subjective and easy review of something, and since this is a fucking movie board having the basic decency of analyzing a movie is the least you can do before shitting on it

Trust the media goy they'd never lie!

>Walkabout

The roeg kino obviously

Where's the lie? They said she had a good chance of winning, not that she would win.

Trust the media goy: the motion picture

>Good chance

>trumpshits think "98% chance of winning" means "she'll get 98% of the votes"
And then you wonder why normal people think you're stupid.

>He thinks that anyone that hates Streep supports Trump

Beautiful, user. Streep is the definition of the self-involved disillusioned rich. Her acting is incredibly mediocre and her only noteworthy performance was playing a snobby bitch in The Devil Wears Prada and calling that acting is questionable because that is Meryl Streep's true personality.

Buttmad kikes are trying to convince us that taking the odds on 98% is actually mental.

Do you actually listen to yourselves?

>Her acting is incredibly mediocre
Fucking teeangers parroting their retarded orange retard,
How many movies have you seen, pleb? The Devils Wears Prada? Fucking pleb.

Feel asleep buying a ticket.
Crap movie.zzzzzzz

I was asleep before it even started

Legitimately seek help for your mental issues.

It's the name of the movie. Maybe it's a black thing or surf lingo. Wacky kids.

You sound like the retards who say "It said 10% chance to rain and it rained, what the fuck, Weathermen are trash"

So this movie is basically a huge collaborated temper tantrum between hollywood and kike news media involving the biggest 'hollywood sweethearts' to jew as many gullible retards into thinking le drumpf evil must impeach COLLUSION TREASON REEEEEE, right?

What an asinine comment. She, infact had a 0% chance of winning and reality demonstrated that fact. Forecasting anything other than 50/50 chances for her made absolutely no sense because accurate polling could not be squires for trim supporters AND THEY NEW THIS. A 50/50 call would have at least admitted "well we will see folks, but really who knows". That would of been the thing to do if you had journalists with more integrity than self deluded hope. Instead they ran with the 99% certainty like the NYT knowing there is a small percentage of voters who literally cant make up their mind until they know who is going to likely win and like to say they voted for the winner. Its pure social engineering. Get the bandwagon last minute vote which is a disturbing actual voting population (can you imagine being so soulless that you wait until election day to see who seems stronger and then just blindly vote for that person?) and don't disclose that your trump support polls are way to inconclusive. Lets just say 98-99% guise.

But reality is she had 0% chance of winning short of Donald trump dying or actually killing with his bare hands on camera a few days before the polls.

>The odds of 10% and 98% are the same thing goy just ignore the missing 88%

Keep digging that hole kike