When should've they fucked?

When should've they fucked?

When Emma was in her prime

Why are soyboys such pedos?

While them fucking would have been interesting, it still wouldn’t be enough to save it from being one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

This, on the first train ride to Hogwarts

Nice

How do you know Hermione didn't fuck him and then go back in time so he wouldn't remember?

Or did they in the tent nearly kissing scene and
then themselves, what we see is the alterered memory not what actually happened?

then obliviate themselves.
Missed a word sorry

They did, though. Multiple times.

When they visited his parents graves and were alone together on the run.

I guarantee that they fucked hard in that tent in the 7th book. They were alone and camping for months without Ron. You know that Hermoine gave her self a magical abortion because there is no way she didn't get pregnant from that fuck fest.

well OP?

>There are people that think Hermione and Ron make a "good couple"

How they fuck did you write that sentence? What even is that actually asking?

>Get pregnant
>Have an abortion
>Use the fetus to make a horcrux

The question is, can you keep the fetus from decaying and destroying the horcrux?

No, no. You need to kill something to make a horcrux. I'm suggesting you use the abortion to make a horcrux.

You make the horcrux the moon or some random fucking rock a beach or a used condom or something.

Ah the blood sacrifice needs to be made. That isn't a bad idea, why didn't they make the moon a horcrux? Then you have a moral conundrum as to whether you destroy it or not.

Not how time travel works in Harry P.

Why was she so cute bros?

At what chronological point in the Harry Potter Septology, should Harry James Potter have initiated sexual intercourse with Hermione Jane Granger, by pushing the exposed glans of his erect penis into her vaginal opening and thrusting?

Nice quads.

What devious shit could you do with Harry Potter time travel?