Why do actresses from the 60s look so much better or am i just a nostalgiafag?
Why do actresses from the 60s look so much better or am i just a nostalgiafag?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
you right
It's because back then actresses were chosen by how visually pleasing they were and not because they knew someone.
imagine fucking a prime Bardot
You're right. Keep posting 60s beauties.
...
You had to actually be beautiful and not a #metoo warrior or have the ability the be made to look pleasing through effects and make up.
Claudia is a close 2nd after Bardot
The makeup they used back then was better for the skin.
Todays makeup is made to fuck up women's skin in the long term, thus resulting in them buying more makeup.
Naw man they were hotter for some reason
...
...
What other anons think of Raquel Welch?
...
...
Soft focus, limited color gamut, and lots of makeup.
...
Honestly, this.
...
Chantal Goya was a total qt.
Old film makes anyone look more attractive as they appear more 'timeless'.
Saying that though, Angelina Jolie was the last great Hollywood sex symbol. Megan Fox, arguably but I think her look is a bit trashy.
the best
To be honest if that's true then the pre-60s girls should look just as good too but it is not even close.
>Old film makes anyone look more attractive as they appear more 'timeless'.
Yes, my dick cares about timelessness, fucking idiot.
imagine being serge gainsbourg. he's my biggest idol honestly. ill never not look up to the guy who was banging both birkin and bardot
It's actually hard for me to deal with how badly I want to fuck her in Hannie Caulder. Like god damn.
...
...
I watched that shitty movie just for her
And they were both much younger than him, dude was pimpin' hard.
I watched a bunch of old french movies just to see her.
Damn, that's cringy as fuck.
>all these qts are now too old or dead
Too old for what?
can't tell if their daughter is qt or not tho
Why are you posting this little whore here?
Guys like Serge, Billy Bob Thornton and many others that I can't be bothered to name right now leave me so intrigued.
At first look you think these guys are just old bums with alcohol/drug problems, they are not conventionally attractive, they were neither very rich nor very powerful (at least not relative to the women they got), yet they pulled PRIME women much younger than them.
These women could have all kinds of Chads lining up to date them yet they chose to be with these guys.
What is it? Is it confidence? Issues? Is the "alcoholic dad" look appealing to some women?
...
not sure either
Once I heard Courtney Love saying "attitude gets you laid,not looks"
this is absolutely untrue. makeup has actually improved and thats why you see 50+ year old women in hollywood that still look good and in the 1960s once you hit 38 you were officially old lady mode.
They did have very high status. Also they were alpha as fuck behaviour-wise.
If you watch any of Serge's music videos, he just oozes confidence and charisma.
sex appeal. if you watch interviews with those guys, they're very dominant powerful men.
That will always trump a chad without that quality.
whats the hemingway line about "not an especially beautiful face, but one you could look at every day for the rest of your life"
No fish-lips or artificially shaped faces (no botox). No fake boobs or butt implants/pads. No extreme photoshopping. Back then there were tricks used to hide faults and improve features but those techniques were very limited. When you saw an image or video of a woman that was pretty much how she looked. Women from the 60s and 70s looked better IMO, because they were natural and real.
Somehow I feel that even thought I look pretty good, if I tried to woo women like pic related and emulate that alpha behaviour, charisma or whatever guys like Serge and Billy had, I'd be laughed at.
Modern makeup isn't better.
Look at any modern woman without makeup, they're hags.
I don't think they were any better looking on average, but the top tier was just a really exceptional group.
>Why do actresses from the 60s look so much better
Well Bardot in your pic is wearing a wig so maybe you just like big hair.
You're a big hair fetishist just like ole Slick Willy!
>tfw no Francoise gf
borderline-not actress but still
It's probably her warm, welcoming smile. Something we don't see so often anymore in today's cynical world.
like the other user said, these guys have status as well. it wouldn't work otherwise.
girls always want to feel like their man is of a higher stature than them.
fake tits didn't exist back then so the stacked honeys were real stacked honeys.
yes and the women being posted didnt look as beautiful without makeup, soft lighting, and black and white photography you nostalgic idiot.
Papa had a way of putting things...
your lack of confidence would contribute to it. Just because these men attract women, does not mean they don't get rejected by some, you only ever see them with women who want them, hence furthering a bias. if you're good looking i do believe you would get laid very easily as long as you're a bit charismatic, feign confidence and don't let rejection put you down because it WILL happen, but so will you getting some
youtube.com
chicks dig confident dudes who are really passionate about and good at things.
she also looks natural and sorta innocent. Not all tarted up.
he was a brokedick and likely a closet fag so likely not the person to take advice on the beauty of women. clearly not a fan of women.
Harvey Weinsteins didn't exist and these beauties mated with other attractive Aryans. Now jews abuse these young actresses lowering their self worth and the pressures of multiculturalism push them into ruining their genetics with a BBC.
Damn, thank you. I remember listening to her songs when I was a child. I used to watch her 'musicals' all the time on vhs and shit. I just forgot who she was until now.
Cheers.
I'm pretty sure the 'casting couch' was even more commonplace back then.
Didn't she star in some movie where she fucks like 20 guys?
They did though.
She ACTUALLY fucked Willem Dafoe
What a low class WHORE
Not to mention I also saw her concert live.
I honestly can't think of a top-tier actress today that even comes close to the looks of the one's from early 2000s.
Like right now, who's at the top? Jennifer Lawrence and Emma Stone? Nowhere near prime Angelina Jolie or Halle Berry
He was a very flawed person no doubt. But still had a great wit
Jews
>jolie in tomb raider
...
prime Angelina was a LEGIT 10/10
She has that ‘I love black guys’ look for something reason. I think it’s becUse she’s half bong half frog
The fuck is this lol
Funniest thing is a lot of these 60s cuties age some of the worst I've ever seen. Jane Birkin is unrecognizable and Anna Karina looks terrifying
...
jfc
Did she forget how to do make-up too?
Most women age like shit tho.
She's in her middle 70s here, so yeah. That's kinda normal, anons.
Maybe they weren't pretty to begin with.
Its all about the teeth. Women now all have the same mouth thanks to braces. Women in the 60s had unique smiles. Now there is only one generic set of teeth.
Nova from Planet of the Apes was stunning
Na, I've known a few girls who were pretty when they were younger (10 years ago) but now have shit skin because they started wearing makeup in their late teens.
There's a reason men generally look better in old age, because we keep our skin makeup-free.
It's literally impossible to not fall in love with Sharon Tate in The Fearless Vampire Killers.
He looks like Mick Jagger. Is that Mick Jagger?
WTF? CHARLOTTE GAINSBOURG LOOKS LIKE *THAT*??
...
Well the movie is pretty boring.
Polanski fucked a prime tate and Emmanuelle Seigner.
How did he do it lol
are you saying she's ugly ?
The Thomas Crown Affair made my dick diamonds for two hours.
Yes, because you'd be 'emulating' it.
That is literally the only pic of her were she looks objectively qt.
Ew. She looks like anyone in my junior high class of 95.
Tate and Seigner fucked a prime Polanski.
How did they do it lol
>he was in junior high in 95
Or if they could act.