How did they screw up the scale this badly?

How did they screw up the scale this badly?

maybe that thing got bigger? or its not the same from the first one? but i asked myself the same question when i saw it

maybe its a low fog
although you'd think the pods parachute would have opened already in that case
a better shot that would have been more clear would have the chute open and then show the monster as they come closer to the ground before cutting to black

The scale of the monster in the new movie doesn't even seem possible, if it's 30,000+ feet high then it shouldn't be able to move that quickly

I thought they were going to do something like that, or pan below the clouds to see cities burning and multiple cloverfield monsters roaming around with the army fighting them

Its the mother monster. How did you guys not connect that? The one in the OG cloverfield was the baby and takes place in a completely seperate time period than TCP.

Imagine its the size of its shit.

Can someone please explain to me, as a person who hasn't seen a single Cloverfield-related movie:

Is this a Cloverfield cinematic universe or something? I'm fucking confused as fuck. Wasn't this JJ flick some "shaky cam" cashgrab monster flick? Am I missing something?

finally, someone's asking the real questions

So the fucker went from being building size to being fucking nearly planet sized

Bravo Avrams

I just found out a couple days ago that there were other Cloverfield movies, AMA

qeq

IRL, its legs would collapse/snap under the creature's own weight.

wasnt there a theory on the first movie that it was a baby and just running around the city confused?

...

good thing it's not posing as a documentary then autist

Irl that thing doesn't exist you colossal faggot.
What is this line of reasoning?

You are assuming it's made of meat with the same density.

It was never supposed to be an expanded universe, cloverfield was supposed to just be a standalone movie with some easter eggs sprinkled throughout (for example something from the sky splashing into the ocean near the end of the movie during some home footage of before the attack) to give it some topic of discussion.

There's a reason why it took almost a decade for them to release something new, because there was never supposed to be a franchise or universe and the sequels are the cashgrab.

okay...so is the John Goodman film in this universe too?

Just like the dinosaurs right?

It's just bullshit marketing scheme, keep the brand name, the actual stories are unrelated.

>cashgrab
?????????

Anyway, yes, there is a loosely-connected universe. Up until now it was only details and thematic stuff.

>More jewish psy-op bullshit

lol do you guys ever wonder what clovies feet smell like?
I imagine they are stinky after spending eons in the ocean and stepping on people haha.
Can you imagine what they would smell like?
Asking for a friend haha.

It grew, dumbass

kys

It upsets me too, man. In fact, I can't even watch Cloverfield because of how frustrated I am that it would NEVER happen in real life

bruh...

Yes, he worked for the company that owned the crashed satellite in the first film.

Yeah apparently but nobody knows where 10 cloverfield lane fits into the overall universe. Like does it take place in our Earth or one of the alternate Earths? The writers probably don't give a shit and they're just writing it as they go anyway.

Someone make the Virgin original clover vs the chad paradox clover

is this series worth watching now...?

You're somehow able to support your faggoty self on those spindly chicken legs

>transformers at cinemas
>awesome start of movie
>was just cloverfield trailer

I was interested until I saw MC is niggress

First one is a solid monster movie if you can handle shakycam
Second one is a GREAT suspense movie. Ending is polarizing, but interesting.
Third one was disappointing for me but people on here seem to consider it "Bright"-tier so it might be worth watching.

I was trying to have a real conversation about these movies, Sup Forumsfaggot...

By third, do you mean the new Netflix film?

Sorry, I meant I was interested until I saw how ugly the MC was.

fuck off mate. Nobody wants you here.

shit like this is like having a snot-nosed kid interrupting you and contributing nothing.
no complaints about the politics since this is Sup Forums. it's just completely mindless and annoying

I hope they can turn this into a LOST universe

That's probably the Mother, or in the 3rd dimension. Now assuming a creature could be that big without collapsing from its own weight,, would a monster that huge screw up mountains, ecosystems, even the weather?

lol, relax niggers, stop yer crying, jesus

>pshh stop your crying I mean, I know I'm crossposting but jeez you niggers niggers niggers

you need to go back

He's not wrong, aesthetics is an important quality in film.
Hiring she-boons is pretty offensive to good taste.

Read the special effects credits. Count the nonwhite and female names.

says the retard that literally doesn't belong.

>STEM nerds are pasty white bois
shocker

>this low hanging Sup Forums bait

What's yer point?

Yes I’m sure the alien monster from a different dimension has the same tissue density, molecular makeup, and physical structure as creatures from our own. Gg

will you please fuck off?

So when does this big guy show up in Paradox?

>he said as he replied
Congrads, you played yourself, chump.

I liked the whale monster more.

>people who are O B S E S S E D with Sup Forums find a way to make a Cloverfield thread all about that board
get off this website you overly sensitive political faggots

it doesn't matter what dimension the monster is from, it still has to obey our laws of physics

(You)

It would fuck up every ecosystem by effectively eradicating it for food. Assuming it requires food like any other creature, it’s calorie requirement is more than double that of John Goodman at his heaviest. Mountains could be torn down if it digs caves to sleep in. Weather patterns wouldn’t change.

final shot of the film

>it's people "obsessed" with Sup Forums
>not just Sup Forums
are you retarded?

>if it's 30,000+ feet high then it shouldn't be able to move that quickly
Actually it would collapse into a pile of mush. Even Godzilla would. It's not realistically possible for a creature to be that large on Earth.

So how exactly do the movies relate to each other?

Of course, but you have no idea what the strength and density of its skeletal structure is. Or what the strength of it’s muscles are like. It might not even have those things. It could be made of flexible ultra-strong fibers for all we know.

Why would you even assume it was natural in the first place?
It's clearly can't be ingenious to Earth.

Stop hijacking threads and derailing conversation. Hiromoot doesn’t care about the klan rally on Sup Forums but you tourists have a crushing need for attention and validation everywhere

not so much a theory as much as that's actually legitimately what the explanation is.

also cloverfield paradox doesn't take place in the same universe as cloverfield you dumb fucks

The OG Clover wouldn’t even be able to breath, nor could any giant monster. There’s a reason animals don’t get as big as dinosaurs anymore, the atmosphere literally can not support land animals that size, it is not possible for a creature that big to consume enough oxygen to function. No animal can ever be that big on Earth, it would die of suffocation in a few hours, tops. If it made it even a couple hours, it’d be hallucinating and freaking the fuck out within the first hour.

It’s also why there aren’t bugs the size of tigers, they’d need a fuckton of oxygen.

They both have cloverfield in the tittle. Pay attention ffs

>It's clearly can't be ingenious to Earth.

as far as we're aware clover is from earth, the ocean-spanning organism that it comes from is still a mystery and might be alien, but we dont know yet

Do I need to watch the original to watch 10 Cloverfield Lane and this new one?

There are plenty of attractive black girls, finding ugly one unappealing isn't """"pol""""" you dumb newcunt.

I’m throwing guesses into the wind. It might not even be a carbon based life form. And we know it’s not from the alternate dimension the astronauts travelled to in Paradox because they lucked out with zero interdimensional cloverbeasts

You do understand they nuked it at the end of the first one right? You do understand with this genre, these types of monsters feed off of nuclear energy. Them nuking the mother fucker made it huge... Pretty logical.

It's a monster movie m8, it REALLY REALLY doesn't have to make 100% sense.

lmao@these triggered libshits
niggers have never made anything positive, they're worse than apes. This is fact.

if it needs to be said to you for some reason...

nice edgy post kiddo

The guy in charge of designing the monster from the original said that he designed it with the intention of it being a newborn. Maybe by the point they're setting down in the new movie it's grown? I don't know how far after the events of the first one they're landing though.

>farts in ur thread

based

>No animal can ever be that big on Earth, it would die of suffocation in a few hours

The atmosphere was fine for Aurochs and Mammoths only a few thousand years ago

At least that one was a good film

Those weren't 30000 feet tall

do you...

do you know that mammoths don't actually reach the size of this monster?

>what is square cube law
you is dumb

holy shit, it's a fictional inter-dimensional monster...

i'm not the guy you're replying to but creatures this big simply cannot exist with earth gravity. when you double the size of any creature, the volume of that creature actually goes up four times. any creature that big would be crushed under its own weight.

there's a video on youtube explaining how this works though i don't remember what it's called. basically sauropod dinosaurs represented the maximum size any organism could ever achieve on land under perfect conditions (tons of food, hollow bones, gigantic tails, pillar legs similar to elephants).

even if you had bones made of steel it wouldn't work on larger creatures (and of course steel would be ridiculously heavy) because the weight (and thus the stresses) go up exponentially rather than linearly.

still, you shouldn't take this shit too seriously..

Those weren’t even as big as a whale, which is an extant species and the largest ever recorded in terms of size. That said, land animals have gotten smaller, not bigger, as the atmosphere changed after the end of the dinosaurs. That’s due in part to the atmosphere itself. I’m not saying there can’t be big animals, but nature pushes the boundaries always, if it were possible for an animal to be that big, there’d be one here already.

Reminder that a nuke couldn't kill the baby in the first movie. How do you kill a monster that is 30,000 feet tall?

no user, you need to answer me

do you know that mammoths aren't comparable to something that breaches the cloud layer?

I'm not that user.

we own this board

So we got a 5 mile tall organic monster. why isn't it affected by bullet or bomb or fire or shampoo or acid or radiation

>people keep saying cloverfield monster was a baby
>watched the movie with subtitles and can't remember a moment when it was mentioned
>find out this fact was from interviews with JJ Abrams
>needing to keep with outside material to make sense of the story
This is the same exact shit people did with Boba Fett. You ask them why he's cool and they point out to appearance and EU material.

Hammerdown wasn't a nuke, it was carpet bombing new york city

>How do you kill a monster that is 30,000 feet tall?
More nukes????

clover isn't inter-dimensional

all versions of earth have clovers. 2008 cloverfield was in a contemporary setting and had a young baby clover wake up. the version of earth in paradox has the same clovers under the ocean, but a much more matured version of clover woke up instead.