"Tarintino makes movies,
Kubrick makes art"
is this true?
"Tarintino makes movies,
Kubrick makes art"
is this true?
Other urls found in this thread:
pusy...
oh oh my god hes unstoppable
Feet...
shill thread
hide
It's the other way around
bait
Kubrick's art is hollow.
Tarantino's art is Reddit.
not really
kubrick knows how to set up an iconic shot
he knows all the most technical aspects of light and motion
but his movies are a bore and dull
all im saying is that he is sort of overrated when it comes to making movies because he cant tell an exciting story
he can present it in a visually sumptuous way but thats about it
probably the first director that chose style over substance and inspired the hackish likes of refn and lynch
Tarantino makes movies, Kubrick makes films.
Look at the top of Tarantino's head.
Tarantino makes flicks
Scorsese makes movies
Kubrick makes films
Tarkovsky makes art
Lopushansky makes kino
kubick makes art
trainitino makes fart
uno farto
BRAPPPPP
Movies and films are synonyms, you faggots
>he doesnt know about the spectrum
nigga the levels of autism needed to comprehend the various levels of moving pictures is beyond your feeble comprehension
No both make pretentious shit.
What?
You know her... don’t you Pete......
too soon
but kurick's been dead for almost 20 years
Kubrick liked Pulp Fiction
What is Tarantula's hairstyle called?
the smooth masturbater
>listen to sade "smooth operator" and this joke becomes 10x funnier
fucking based
Why do you format your posts like this?
cuz im a modern poet
and its easier on the eyes
and you know when im done making a point