*ruins your episode*

*ruins your episode*

He reminds me of pic related

t. underage

Get some real friends, e-celeb phoneposting faggot.

He doesn't ruin it but he is useless

he kinda does ruin it because he takes the place of someone else who likes to get more involved into the discussion. I don't know what's this dude problem but I honestly don't like him at all.

I like Jim.

At least it's not AIDS or Mr. Estrogen

whats wrong with you faggot?

Why can't mutts understand deadpan humour?

He always looks like he's about to pass out

Youtube trash e-celeb faggot quarantine board when?

He's better than the other Canadian
and Fatbeard

nah, this guy is good.

>tfw you're so far gone you can't differentiate between an act under layers and layers of irony and someone being genuinely unexcited and miserable in the front of the camera

I'd rather have this boring leaf who does nothing than some annoying faggot like that fat fucking neckbeard numale or that bald reddit soy slurping fag

I forget what his name is but the comic book guy was by far the worst person to ever be on the show.

Here's what HitB Black Panther will be
>I like the movie it was okay I like bland capeshit
>both sides are stupid this movie is not political blade exists

That's Rich Evans and he's on every episode.

Freddy Prinze Jr

>hrrrrgh why doesn't anyone like my snyderkinos, mom? Why is this happening to me?
lmaoing@urlyf

I can't stand the exaggerated faces Jack makes to the camera. I think it annoys Mike and Jay as well because they never give him a close up when he does it.

What?

>>both sides are stupid this movie is not political blade exists
nah they dont do that. they didnt say anything about feminism in their hitb on cuntbusters either.
and thats a good thing

They did for Fury Road and Red Tails

both not as big in controversy as these two

Say 'what' again.

>*ruins Sup Forums with constant obsessive RLM threads*

He's high as fuck

>it's possible to ruin Sup Forums
I guess if you like memes, political shitflinging and only capeshit and starshit being discussed.

Imagine thinking anyone other than Josh is the worst thing about RLM.

this, the tmnt vs batman artist was a douche

Josh is terribad. Dude actually wants to spend 40 minutes talking about the lighting in a single scene.
I'd rather that creepy girl that wanted to rape Jay be there than that fat fuck.

I don't get the hate against Josh. The guy doesn't really push any SJW bullshit on the show, he's just there. I think the faggots here hate him because he looks like them.

How was he a douche? He may not have been the funniest guest or anything, but he was a decent enough guy.

t. the tmnt vs batman artist

What a convincing argument

Its pretty obvious that all the shit Jay likes that is avant garde and artsy fartsy is totally a side effect of listening to Josh.
Jay doesn't get the deep shit but really REALLY wishes he did. Josh actually gets it, but no one wants to listen to that shit when they are watching RLM.

Sounds like your own personal fanfiction at this point.

Every episode he's been on he's been gold, thanks to based Canadian Colin being there too.

Friendly reminder btw that Colin is a 44 year old man.

It creeps in some times.
Like there will be a rape scene in a movie, and they’ll be discussing/joking about it, and he starts grimacing and acting uncomfortable trying to change the subject.

It’s a shitty B Movie you dumb fuck, not CCTV footage.

>Its pretty obvious that all the shit Jay likes that is avant garde and artsy fartsy is totally a side effect of listening to Josh.
Or maybe they became friends because of similar interests? Jesus Christ, some of you are really terrible at hiding how lonely and friendless you are.

I unironically miss Max Landis, that guy was such a bro

>Friendly reminder btw that Colin is a 44 year old man.
Friendly reminder that you're a permavirgin and you will die alone.

Jay literally can't verbalize why he likes something (or can't on camera due to being a pussy). You can't act like you are a know it all about film or anything related to the humanities, then be incapable of verbalizing your thoughts, it literally doesn't work that way. If you can't verbalize it, you aren't thinking on the level you claim to be. Beardfat can do it flawlessly, but it is maximum borefest. He knows what he's talking about, he just doesn't gel with the rest of the cast and what they are doing. Aidsmoby is insuffferable but he perfectly fits jay mike and rich.

Jay is what Josh would be if Josh cared even the smallest bit about what people thought of him.

WHAT THE FUCK

Oh boy, he's here

>You can't act like you are a know it all about film or anything related to the humanities, then be incapable of verbalizing your thoughts
He never tries to act like a know it all though.

Hi Mike

It's not about any SJW bullshit, it's just his personality. I mean, everyone knows that there's a camera, but even in sketches there's a naturality in how most of them act that comes from the fact that none of them gives too much of a shit about what the audience might think of them. That's what's compelling about them, they're not actively trying to be liked.

Meanwhile Josh tries so fucking hard, particularly when he doesn't have to, that's painfull to watch. I can understand how he acts because I once was an insecure fuck like him, trying to analyze every situation from every angle to come up with some smart observation and be validated. Thing is, that's bad on it's own, but when you make it as obvious as him everyone feels how sad you are.

Primo canadian syrup is like an emulsifier, he is practically a walking mummy.

Mike is a Boomer trapped in a Gen X body.

You seem to take your friend simulators very seriously.

>The guy doesn't really push any SJW bullshit on the show
I'll actually give him credit for that, especially after seeing his pathetic twitter feed.

>abstract imagery is part of a film for 2 seconds.
>Mike says he gets it but didn't like it
>Jay flusters for 20 minutes about how some artfilm he saw 10 years ago gave him similar feelings to this scene, but stumbles and mumbles when Mike asks him to elaborate.
>Mike knows Jay will fumble it so he just sits there sullen for 10 minutes
>the film will be about the most gorey shit imaginable, not even about abstract thinking, just overt gore for the sake of it.

And you take a simple image based bbs and turn it into your own personal enemy simulator. Which is the pathetic one?

>Jay literally can't verbalize why he likes something (or can't on camera due to being a pussy).
This is clearly wrong, he does so every week. Aren't we projecting our inadequacies here, brother user? Isn't it time for that sweet, sweet lithium?

Mike>Rich>>Jess>>>Max Landis>Jay>>>>Beardfat>Freddie Williams>>Canadians>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AIDSMoby

>>abstract imagery is part of a film for 2 seconds.
>>Mike says he gets it but didn't like it
>>Jay flusters for 20 minutes about how some artfilm he saw 10 years ago gave him similar feelings to this scene,
Point to even one example of this happening.

>Jess
She was terrible, fuck you

>Aren't we projecting our inadequacies here, brother user?
Welcome to literally every RLM thread

At least it's not Jack.

Jay enjoys abstract stuff but he also likes a lot of Marvel movies and b-movie schlock. He just enjoys a lot of weird shit and never tries to turn it into something more intellectual than it is. What are you even trying to argue?

that was uncalled for, what the hell, man?

>I can understand how he acts because I once was an insecure fuck like him, trying to analyze every situation from every angle to come up with some smart observation and be validated.

You're still doing it.

Their review of "Mother" instantly comes to mind. Mike says he sees all the overt christian imagery and thinks its okay but just doesn't work to well because it is so in your face.
Jay spends the rest of the review gushing about the mayhem and the juxtoposition of the imagery is a good fit for it.

Their review of "It"
Mike says they are just going for cheap jumpscares with good cinematography strewn about, says he'd rather they do somthing better for IT, but thats the way it is.
Jay spends the entire review talking about doing it better and somehow making jump scares artsy, while shitting on the original movie.

Their review of "Arrival"
Mike thought it was boring and deliberatly told confusingly, and as a viewer it didn't work for him. He got what they were doing, it just didn't work.
Jay spends the whole time gushing about the abstract concept of communication in the now and completely gets the theory on its application wrong (he just took what the movie told him instead of thinking critically), and waxing philosophic about the "look" of the film when all of its merit is in its dialogue and concepts.

Jay just focuses on the wrong aspect of a movie they are watching. Mike will realize when something doesn't work and will call it as such. Jay will argue with you that you didn't "get" how they purposefully made it bad or it was too cerebral for you, when it was just bad. He can't accept people not liking something that they, in theory, should. He can't live in reality.

Let me fix that wrong opinion with some POWER RANKINGS.

1. Drunk Mike
2. Rich
3. Len
4. Mike
5. Jay
6. Drunk Jack
7. Colin
8. Freddy
9. Drunk Josh
10. Max
11. Jim
12. Jack
13. Josh
14. Women

its almost like jay is reviewing the movie and provides some background information.
jesus.

just come out and say that you only want mike to throw out some wacky one liners, smiling and saying eeeeehhitsokay"

There's nothing necessarily smart about what I wrote, and there aren't too many angles from where to analyze Josh. Or a reason to.

is Len a Chad?

>Jay spends the rest of the review gushing about the mayhem and the juxtoposition of the imagery is a good fit for it.
Jay thought the central metaphor was ham fisted and obvious and mostly shit on the movie.

>Jay spends the entire review talking about doing it better and somehow making jump scares artsy,
He literally never tries to talk about making jump scares artsy. What the fuck are you even babbling about? He just talks about how cheap and lazy jump scares are.

Literally your entire post reads like this
>Jay didn't express MY opinions

He seems like a nice guy. But he is literally autistic.

he's a virgin chad

Can Chads have autism?

He says its hamfisted, but says he can't look away when the drama grips him, as was intended by the director. He drinks his own koolaid.

Jay would rather be watching literal snuff films over the stuff they actually watch. Then claim its about the "human condition." the guy is a psychopath.

>says he can't look away when the drama grips him, as was intended by the director.
You're literally making shit up. He makes fun of how on the nose Aronofsky is and says the movie is poorly handled to the point that he wasn't even affected by a baby being ripped apart and eaten. He wasn't gripped by the drama.

They should honestly have Len back and do drunken kung fu marathons. not best of the worst style, actual good kung fu movies.
then totally rip them to shreds and make Len cry until he beats them up

>the guy is a psychopath
Based on your inability to comprehend reality, I think you may be the one with mental problems, mate

...

It's one autistic guy. I asked something innocuous about their patreon once and he went off on me about virginity etc.

When he chimes in he hits hard. He's pretty funny.

I like him too

*ruins your fantasies*

Half in the Bag: The Movie is actually a good watch.

*kicks your fantasies into overdrive*

Test

>tfw you just realized Mike and Jay come here to argue in a way they can't in real life.

Is Space Cop worth watching?
I watched the AVGN movie and it was the worst piece of shit i've ever seen.

it's mediocre but gave me a few laughs

No you're thinking of Max Landis

>That's Rich Evans and he's on every episode.

that was easily the happiest day of Landis' life. Dude would have let them all peg him at once, with a smile on his face.