How should have this been made?

How should have this been made?

it shouldn't have been made.

This, VI is the perfect ending to the series. Fuck the EU, and fuck Nu-Wars.

With respectful consideration of the existing fanbase in terms of the obvious tension that turning the franchise into 'disney movies' would cause.

Let George be a producer, get talented upcoming directors

i thought rey was going to find luke made force, like levitating or something force related.
but he was just standing there bored and old.

step 1: plan out your fucking trilogy

they couldn't even be bothered

This, and let GL also write the story and someone else the screenplay

I didn't get this. You would think if youre going to sink this much money into a series of movies, you would want to ensure continuity by having an overarching plot planned out already

/thread

I don't even think that's the main problem. What really makes this trilogy so shitty to me is the fact that the story is unoriginal as fuck. 7 = 4 and 8 = 5

Pretty simple. Do what they did with the LOTR:
1) 10 years of development, for script, art direction, and production.
2) VERY careful casting. If you start filming and realise that you made a mistake (like they did with the first Aragorn), you recast and get it right.
3) Film them all at once, so that there is continuity and a feeling of unity.

But they didn't do this because they wanted money NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW. And now they've killed the Golden Goose.

Continuation of the Skywalker saga. No idea why no one at Disney realise that the entire series is literally about Anakin and Luke. It's obvious that the main character of the new trilogy should have been Luke's kid instead of literal who characters that aren't connected to anything in the other films. Episode 7 should have been Luke and Leia and Han being a continuation of their characters at the end of EP 6, retarded idea to make them all failures and have accomplished nothing.
Also, 1 director for the whole trilogy, a good director with lots of experience, with a lot of creative control.

The story should be set 100 years after ROTJ ...

Stars Wars died the second Yoda showed up.
Your lives are a lie.

By giving it to one director \ script-writing team with consistent view on what and how to do. TLJ basically tried to reboot franchise. And failed in that. If that ideas were brought in ep VII - it would work.

>Also, 1 director for the whole trilogy, a good director with lots of experience, with a lot of creative control
But who?

A bunch of EU material is considerably better than the movies. In fact the movies are by far the worst part of star wars

It might as well be set 100 years later. We're supposed to believe that in 30 years this first order has risen to the power of the empire after it was destroyed and all the main characters reset their arcs and ended up huge failures. It makes no sense.

>A bunch of EU material is considerably better than the movie
Luke fucks in the EU. That makes no sense.

the EU does have some garbage content but a bunch of it is good

7-8-9 should have been about the legacy of Luke and Anakin, set decades maybe even centuries after ep6. We don't need Leia or Han

>Getting laid makes no sense
You're projecting

Luke is a jedi. Jedi don't fuck because they're like monks or catholic priests.

> change Rey to Luke's daughter. (No huge reveal make it known to audience)

>VII follow Rey and Kylos training. Small scale adventure Kyle turns to dark end of movie.

>follow Rey as she attempts to bring Kylos to light side. Rey falls to the dark side by the end. Kylo see's how it has changed his cousin, voys to a dying Luke to bring her back.

IX kylo sacrifices himself I an effort to save Rey. Rey changes to light. Saves galaxy. Credits role.

Only looking at top tier directors who would see a sci-fi blockbuster as right up their alley.
>Obviously James Cameron would be the best possible, but he was doing avatar sequels.
>Spielberg hasn't made a good movie in a decade, not sure if he's capable or interested anymore.
>Peter Jackson obviously fucked up with the Hobbit, but before that he exclusively made kino, maybe not him.
>Robert Zemeckis still makes great movies, he'd be a strong choice I reckon.
>Ron Howard, directing solo, would have been an awesome choice from the start to do the whole trilogy.
>The man... George Lucas.
Basically Disney should've have hired utter hacks like JJ Abrams and easily controllable shrimp with one good movie to their name like Rian Johnson.

They control their emotions and don't marry. They can have all the detached casual sex they want though.