Boom

>This kills the Aziz Azari apologists

Really makes me think

>le pajet manlet

i dont understand

someone replaced ansari's dick with his wallet, and rape with robbery in the narrative as altering the context provides some kind of devistating counter argument

what's funny to me about the whole thing is that she probably had a good five inches on aziz

famous teen actor aziz ansari

>We went to his place

Why would you go there if you don't want to do anything? Women act like they're some incel who doesn't understand why people go out on dates and ask people back to their apartments.

So she's equating her pussy with money. Interesting.

*in

If you’re white and defend a paki you should be beaten to death.

>we went back to his apartment
What did she expect for them to do? Play Scrabble?

Did you even read the image text before replying? Do you fully understand the analogy and its implications?
Besides,
>What did she expect for them to do? Play Scrabble?
>Why would you go there if you don't want to do anything?
They could stay up late talking and getting to know each other more intimately, just make out, maybe have some sexual contact but in a way that they both actually find enjoyable, or any of a million other reasons.

She's equating money with sexual attention in a loose reversal of the "if you dress like mr. moneybags it's your fault if you get robbed" false equivalence argument used to blame women and their clothing for the sexual assault crimes perpetrated against them. And that went right over your head. Interesting.

I think it's more

her sucking his dick (making him think sex is okay) = him putting the wallet on the table (making her think taking the money is okay)

But this "I don't want to hate you" is so clunky and I guess it has to do with her kinda agreeing to sex but not actually. It's a dumb line.

>if it's not okay to steal money it isn't okay to try to have sex with someone

>trying to make a point
>admitting that your main interest in a guy is his money
>expecting me to take you seriously
Why are roasties so dumb, lads?

>i get asked for money
>i literally pull out my wallet and set it on the coffee table in front of her
>i'm somehow not sending signals that I want her to take the money

She's never gonna fuck you, user.

I think the most frustrating thing about the image is that she fucking signs it at the bottom.
Like she's made such a goddamn earth-shattering point that she wants to be credited every time it gets reposted. Fuck me.

Also, what kind of weak fool would watch someone take money from them without telling them to stop, and then send them a whiny little text later telling them they shouldn't have done it?

What a silly person Livia Scott is.

But what she's implying is that most rape victims spend the date performing sexual acts. That's the only way that equates "He was giving money to the waiter, therefore he will give me money" to a rape story. "She was fucking the waiter, therefore she will fuck me".

It's also just a weak analogy in that where there is an exchange of money, there's a giver and a receiver. It isn't an act of mutual giving.
To equate that to sex is to say that, in her opinion, all sex is something that a woman gives a man, and not a mutual act. Which is a very unfortunate way to view something that two people do together.

are you retarded MRAs fucking stupid? do you not understand the allegory shes making. shes not admitting that she just took the dudes money, shes comparing guys pressuring women to have sex on dates and a woman just taking a dudes money because she ignored all his signs, JUST LIKE MEN DO WHEN THEY IGNORE A WOMENS SIGNS AND TRY TO DATE RAPE HER. good lord people here are dumb as shit. DO YOU GET IT NOW? HYPOCRITE VIRGIN Sup ForumsTARDS?

Everyone gets it, they're just pointing out the weak analogy.

Like, if I tell you that you shouldn't stab people because it's not nice when people say mean words.

It doesn't mean that either of the things I'm saying are wrong, but the comparison also doesn't track the way I want it to.

>some kind of devistating counter argument
in that it still makes the woman look like an asshole?

there's a word people can use when they don't want to do something. I wonder what that word is.


I wonder if women can actually consent to dating. they seem to be so infantile in their actions and emotions that they can't possibly take care of themselves anymore.
maybe they can start dating after they take a dating test that says they are responsible for their own actions. same way you are responsible if you get behind the wheel of a vehicle.

women need to grow the fuck up. #timesup on excuses.

Men don't cry about it for the rest of their lives

I've saved the pic, and renamed it as "nice guys.jpg". It's a great reminder for "never waste money or time on a girl you want to fuck, once you figured out she ain't gonna fuck you.".

Well, it's a shit analogy (not allegory), and the situtation can in both cases be resolved with "I don't feel like fucking" or "don't take my money". For all the talk about equality, strong women, and consent, they don't seem to be interested in actual communication.

You are a sad fucking cunt

NIce

...

Did Aziz's date get a lobster dinner by fucking the waitstaff?

But thats true though. Never wear your Rolex and nice suit out if you don't want to get robbed. Sad world we,live in m8

>She's equating money with sexual attention in a loose reversal of the "if you dress like mr. moneybags it's your fault if you get robbed" false equivalence argument used to blame women and their clothing for the sexual assault crimes perpetrated against them.
Are you under the impression this doesn't happen? Do you think if some 70-year-old white dude walks down a deserted alley in the middle of a large city at 3am on a Saturday night and gets robbed, people aren't going to call him a fucking moron for being there?

Also, you don't know what a false equivalence is and should probably stop using the term until you've remedied that.