British tax dollars pay to have their history blacked
British tax dollars pay to have their history blacked
Other urls found in this thread:
...
""""""""""Great"""""""""" Britain
I bet back in the day nobody was racist too
Actually I can kinda see Roman Soldier due to Rome's relationship with Carthage
>cuck bbc
>have to register your id to watch porn
>economic suicide with brexit
how did the british fall this far?
WE
The first Briton was black and they have been a prominent part of British society throughout recorded history.
Get over it
Carthage was Semitic, unless you're talking about a couple of black tribes they might have ruled over.
>Carthage
AYO HOL UP U BE SAYIN WE WUZ FYNEECIANS N SHEEIT
>a random cartoon
>a couple of people that were only barely mentioned at best
>an extra from tumblr: the show
whine whine whine
they where phoenician not in any shape or form black
We're the Jew's testing ground for the rest of the world. Always have been their puppets I fucking hate this country.
...
>documentaries that are literally hostory
>forcefully changing it
>history revisonism in it's purest form
Let's see how long it'll take until Hitler will be shown as a proud descendant of a subsaharan mongolid.
See in Britain we don't have this weird obsession with race. Nobody really gives the slightest shit and most of are minorities so long as they aren't muslim are well integrated.
This is clearly a psy-op, they've been pushing niggers and interracial shit here for years now.
Lol
North Africans were not black at all.
At this point they deserve it.
Author of that theory is literally jew.
>ancient
oh no some evolved and some didnt
>Be Black
>Go Back to Africa
>Fine, I'll make my home in Morocc-
>No! Noo noo noo you uh, too white
this. hard to feel sorry for them anymore.
...
>We don't care if they change our history
KYS
The Hollow Crown is not a documentary, it's an anthology of Shakespeare adaptations
Bongs, pls, stop portraying historical figures as niggers, thanks.
>be Sup Forums closeted racist
>don't know about Brittish pantomime
>believe the BBC are "cultural marxists"
Who fucking cares about the past? Retards can interpret history as they want but it's just them being retarded if they interpret it wrong. Look at history how it would seem logical, and don't expect people to actually be indoctrinated into learning it wrong. Race is not a problem in Britain unless you're a Arab Muslim.
lmao you're so mad. I wish I could watch a video of your rage fit lolololo
Hahaha you got me Mehmet now back to Kebab shop
most retarded post i've seen all day
Doesn't Guinevere literally mean "The White Enchantress"?
Looks like native anglos to me.
>their
They're blacking Greek history, also. Achiles, described as a blond Chad with 10/10 aesthetics, is a fucking dindu nigger.
why
why do they use the niggest african nigs? Don't they have caribbean blacks with some white admixture?
>dollars
>tax
To make you angry.
Seething
>Carthaginians
>Black
tell your sis to stop by again
hehehe
Dont for get the great Zulu king Whitey McWhiterton
He doesn't look black, as in sub Saharan African, in terms of facial characteristics.
If you haven't noticed the BBC hates white people you must have been living under a rock.
Naw, just you dumb fuck anglos. Latin Americans all our Tv/Movie stars are white when we have more shit skins than you guys. Plus feminist bullshit doesn’t really exist here. Probably shouldn’t have trashed Christianity now you’re stuck with self hating degenerate atheist and savage Muslims.
Did i strike a nerve?
>Study Cheddar Man's genetics
>Only gene relating to skin color is a lack of the gene that creates pale, fair skin
>That means that Cheddar man could be on a slider anything from olive- pitch black, we dont know
>Make him dark fucking brown for no reason, even though she has blue eyes.
What did (((they))) mean by this?
Reminder that Jesus Christ was black
>Robin Hood, King Arthur, Dr. Who, and Achilles
>Documentaries
for making you mad?
no you did not
hehehe
/thread
really good point, just calling something retarded.
Still doesn't make sens to cast them black, outside for normalizing this shit.
That's not biologically likely. White skin occurs for a reason, namely vitamin D levels requiring paler skin in order to be maintained at higher latitudes.
Black skinned people suffer from serious and crippling skeletal defects without dietary supplements in places like europe
Black's bones crumble with out the sun.
>their history
WE
I genuinely don't even understand what you were trying to say in your post. something about how it's impossible for history to be interpreted wrongly? - which isn't true.
>complain on Sup Forums
>don't complain using the BBC complaint forms
Also, Robin Hood? Fiction. King Arthur? Fiction. Dr Who? Fiction. Troy? Fiction. Hollow Crown, pseudo-fiction (Shakespearian drama).
At best you have a complaint about the History of Britain but 1. It wasn't made by the BBC and 2. They have Asians and Orientals in the CARTOON as well. None of these shows are fucking over any 'historical accuracy' because they are fiction and genderswaps and race swaps have been done before. You fucks didn't moan when the film Troy had white Americans portraying Greeks. You fucks didn't moan when Rome (also by BBC) had White Brits portraying Romans. You fucks didn't moan when Spartacus: Blood and Sand was portrayed by Kiwi's and Brits (And there was DARKIES AND TRANNIES IN THAT TOO! YOU EVEN SEEN A DUDE WITH BOOBS AND HIS WANG OUT! DEGENERATE SJW KEK MARXIST SHILL JEW!!!!!!).
Go to the BBC website, go to Complaint Forms. Complain. See what reply you get.
That's for the Irish version, Findabair. Guinevere Old French for the Welsh Gwenhwyfar: gwen meaning "fair, white" and hwyfar meaning "smooth".
>IM TIRED OF HAVING POLITICAL AGENDAS SHOVED DOWN MY THROAT
>the exact same thread with even the same picture gets posted on Sup Forums multiple times a day
Because children can be brainwashed into believing European history was always a multiracial 56% utopia.
No really that's the actual reason if you read the interview about this episode.
your post makes no sense retard
But Britain was ruled by Rome. Brits are unironically Roman descendents.
...
I think the original Celts have something to say about that. Then the Picts. Then the Vikings. Then the Anglo-Saxons. Then the Normans (but I guess you could class them as Vikings). Then the French. Who are descended from Gaul and Rome... Odd how this works, huh.
I get the other wins, but didn't the Brits use African askaris?
Ones*
Yeah, so referring to the original point there's no problem with Brits playing romans, as those groups intermingled to some extent.
Having them play Asisns with makeup is pretty out there though.
Im sorry you jave the reading comprehension of a small child
Not him, but it's pretty diluted now to the point where it's not really there. You can't really call Britain's descendants of Romans the same way you can't call Croats that even though Rome ruled over that area.
Now jesus is black too, what do the jews say about that?
You seem to ignore a crucial element here: Us Europeans, be Italians,Spaniards, Greeks, whatever, are A-OK with Brits or generally white Americans playing us, because we do look pretty much alike. NigNogs though? Well buddy, that's simply absurd.
...
Most visual depictions of history are completely inaccurate and informed entirely by the present, it's been this way forever.
>uk
>tax dollars
Russian poet.
Is that black hermione in the top right?
kill yourself dipshit
>media being produced to be consumed by the masses is the same thing as someone shitposting on an anonymous imageboard
Retard
>Brits are unironically Roman descendents.
Maybe a very small portion of their genes, but the Romans mostly left, or were killed by the Britons and later invading germans and vikings as the western empire collapsed. The collapse in Britain especially happened staggeringly fast, like over the course of a generation it went from fully integrated part of the Roman world to a tribal backwater with almost no outside contact
Sure - but a croatian actor isn't going to raise eyebrows playing a roman senator either. Same can't be said if he decided to portray Sitting Bull.
>Then the French. Who are descended from Gaul and Rome
Actually the french were descended from the Germanic Franks, they just took the Roman language. The Gauls were Celts whose remnants were pushed to Brittany as germanic tribes took control of the Roman province of Gaul
To understand why this sort of thing is commonplace on British TV you need to understand a bit about how race relations in this country operate.
If you look at the demographics of the UK, the country is 87% white give or take. About 3% is black, and the 10% remaining "Asian", which includes anyone from the continent, namely Indians and Pakistanis ("Asian" in Britspeak really means people from the Indian subcontinent). Minorities are typically concentrated in the cities, while the countryside and smaller towns are overwhelmingly white British.
The crux of the issue is that Asians are typically tight-knit and identify very strongly with the culture of their ancestral homelands. Black British, like African Americans, tend to be far more deracinated, but on the flipside are a lot more willing to "integrate". Black British culture, like its American counterpart, isn't self-sufficient; it defines itself within the parameters of white society. Asians are, culturally-speaking, agnostic to the existence of white Brits. They aren't trying to subvert us like Sup Forums claims; they are ultimately indifferent to what we do.
In this respect, white patronage is probably more important to blacks than it is to Asians, since the latter are a lot more culturally self-sufficient. If it were simply a question of demographics we would see twice as many Asians than Black British on TV and in other forms of media but this isn't the case. "The System" simply finds blacks to be more educible. Adding other factors like white guilt, mawkishness, the fact that the media in this country is very London-centric, and the desire to smoothe over the UK's colonial past and the results aren't that surprising.
This is an interesting insight. Can I ask why the subcontinent though? Other countries in the west have a broader array of racial backgrounds.
>Can I ask why the subcontinent though?
because we owned it? and it's in asia?
It was the Jewel in the crown
No I mean why do people there specifically migrate to england as opposed to say Chinese, Middle Eastern etc...
You used to own large chunks of those places too.
probably because of India's long ties with England and how India is super fucking overcrowded unlike the middle east
Well, they keep voting for it.
>No I mean why do people there specifically migrate to england as opposed to say Chinese, Middle Eastern etc...
i imagine the first-gen ones would've came over because the UK was much better than most of the other former-colonial places.
why move to another colonial province when you can go to the heartland?
Was this article written by a retarded person? Why is it like that?
Fair point.
I like how incredible historical inaccuracies that arguably transform a historical story into pure fiction are glossed over, but when it comes to skin pigmentation, it's the end of civilisation as devised by the jews.
nog version
Americans would never do this, as no Americans actually care about their own history.
WW2 happened and the UK needed more manpower. A significant number of them already spoke English
can't care about something you've never had.
Wow this is so progressive and tolerant. I feel morally superior knowing I support this. Fuck you racists.
why do white people complain about everything?