DUDE MUH SJWs

The show

t. SJW

Black Panther just got a near perfect score because of SJWs. What will it take to get normies to take them seriously? for fucks sake

normies are the sjws

>it's a joe relates something back to mma or stand up comedy episode

joe please stop doing this. please.

>making the same thread on multiple boards
Joe living in your head rent free

...

> didn’t see the movie
> think the good reviews is because of muh mainstream media pandering to SJW boogeyman

> Conservashits still get triggered still by modern day black blaxploitation films and are constantly obsessed with trannies

>got a 99 on RT, higher than many of the greatest films of all time
k

Ya dude its definitely because its one of the best movies ever and not because 1 critics are paid and encouraged to give movies like that a high score and 2 cuck lefty critics think that "representation" somehow makes a movie better. Idiot.

Sounds like you are taking RT reviews way too seriously. Go find some meaning in your life, clean your bedroom like your Daddy Jordan Peterson would suggest

but how is it that any movie with representation is considered bad according to Sup Forums?

What about Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? The Wire? Hangover? Marathon Man? Blade? Scary Movie? All the movies with jewish leads?

>everyone who hates sjw are conservatives

Normies largely do take them seriously enough. Just look at the reaction to the Jordan Peterson interview with Cathy Newman, which blew way up.

Anyway, I'd say the worst example of their influence is the Google memo shit. They're fucking getting people fired from billion dollar tech companies for not agreeing with them.

>SJW'S aren't a threat
>It's literally illegal to make the wrong jokes in some countries now

>breitbart

>Attacking the source instead of the fact that those laws exist

>defending breitbart

>the guardian and the daily mail are fine
>breitbart is not

This is literally fake.

>still not using an actual argument.

how do you even put the Guardian next to the Daily Mail? Do you even read newspapers at all?

argument to what??? the source is either credible or not BECAUSE of the way they report events. If an unsupervised child dies in a chainsaw accident and I publish an essay on Leatherface, I cannot be taken seriously.

>because the guardian occaisonly has an article about left wing identity politics breitbart is fine and i love adolf hitler

"But what might constitute terrorist content? According to British Home Secretary Amber Rudd, that concept includes “far-right propaganda.”

“I want to make sure those who view despicable terrorist content online, including jihadi websites, FAR RIGHT PROPAGANDA and bomb-making instructions, face the full force of the law,”

It literally took one google search to get a quote from the British Home Secretary.

>*breathes*
>I had this dream in the float tank about bowhunting elk on 80mg THC
>or was it 75mg? Jamie pull up that brand of gummies I forgot
>but yeah I bet an adult chimp could fuck up an elk though, those things are insane
>Jamie pull up that one video of the chimp fighting the elk
>jesus christ
>do you think Islam would even allow this video
>such a restrictive culture man, it's very strange

>"hurr durr hurr i'm a retarded conservashit and i don't understand how RT works durr "

there are lots of MCU with more 90% approvation. thor ragnarok got 92%, spider-man homecoming too and iron man got 94%. you're just retarded and doesn't understand what a "Review aggregator" is

It's been reported on multiple sites user.

Joe Rogan is the #1 driving force in smug normie pseudo-intellectualism in the world.

Yeah, it's a consensus of paid reviewers and social-justice trend followers wanting to keep their ""extra"" revenue lines open.

i think joe is a lot of things, but smugs not one of them.

People who listen to his podcast regularly are very smug.

>THE VIEW FOR MEN

care to provide them then?

...

>implying you know 60 million people
lmao

Jesus christ you are in too deep. Just leave this website your brain is too small to handle it. You just don't understand anything.

> emasculated kekistani weebs

dang I sure wouldn't wanna mess with those guys. way more massculine than despicable soy boys