And don't give me that "all of humanity is wrecked, gg" bullshit. I'm not denying most of humanity would get wrecked, but a couple of countries should come out relatively untouched by nukes.
If WW3 comes down to USA & NATO vs Russia & allies, most of North America, Europe, and parts of Asia are bathing in uranium for the next thousand years.
However sub sahara Africa should come out relatively untouched (why waste the nukes on them when you are fighting other nuclear capable countries). Southeast asia should be good. Australia could make it out if they don't get dragged in. Also South America should be good.
Which of these areas will Sup Forums think about fleeing to if they survive the first wave?
>However sub sahara Africa should come out relatively untouched
bullets are relatively inexpensive
Cameron Richardson
You won't have time to flee
Jace Brown
Nigerians are literally going to rule the world
Oliver Watson
>could have
Jason Bennett
I'm fucking fine mate, no one even knows we're here.
Nathan Stewart
microbes and maybe cockroaches
Aiden Foster
Uhh yes you will. The entire point of nuclear warfare is to cripple the other country before they can cripple you and there's still a chance (relatively small chance thou). It's not just >lol gg >mash buttons >unload entire arsenal in one go
There's still strategy involved such as attacking nuclear silos and military bases first. Perhaps a city or two to get the enemy to back off. Also, you have to account for travel time, damage assessment, and nuclear defense. Some of your nukes may not reach your targets so you attack the same target multiple times. That involves waiting. That waiting time you could be fleeing your ass somewhere.
