Why is the whole film shot in green-screen? Even the normal Earth scenes looked extremely faked and photoshopped

Why is the whole film shot in green-screen? Even the normal Earth scenes looked extremely faked and photoshopped.

Pic related

cause it's cheaper ya dingbat

In the trailer those first Hela scenes were in some city, but in the movie they changed it to a field for some reason.

Probably not enough quips for Feige. That scene looked so obviously reshot and green-screen'd. I how fake and corporate Marvel movies are.

reminder these films all have the same people working behind the camera. the director is literally a placeholder who sits in his chair and does a bit of footage for BTS

>reminder these films all have the same people working behind the camera.
Is that true? Even cinematographer and writers? Wouldn't surprise now that you say it since they all look alike.

It was originally in NY but Odin's death scene was terrible in that cut so it was changed

The absolute state of major blockbuster movies. It's cheaper to use greenscreen and CGI than it is to literally just go out to the middle of nowhere and set up a camera near some short cliffs and water

Judging by how many scenes were out of place green-screened I'd judge a huge chunk of the film was reshot. I love when retards still think Marvel has directors.

cinematography and writers is also a place holder for people who do nothing.
Black Panther has Coogler's DP who he works with regularly, yet the film is standard shit

>Fly everyone out to fucking Iceland or Norway or wherever they were meant to be, wait for the correct weather, set up all your equipment then shoot the scenes, then bring everything home
Or
>Pay pajeet to do it on his laptop

>flat shot
>the architectural order of the set doesn't match the shot perspective
>short focal length so the discrepancy isn't hidden even a little bit

I hate these fucking movies, literally the death of cinema

Thanks for putting to words why that shot looks awful. I knew something was off big time but I just couldn't describe why.

so why praise lazy filmmaking?

Also, since they are also well in focus because of the enormous depth of field, your eye is immediately drawn to the hurt soldiers in the background that are literally blocked centre frame and on the tertiary line.
You can barely see Thor and Loki. This is such a mess

I'm not praising it, but it's obvious why they do it.
Not spending money on pointless crap that doesn't improve the product is business 101.
Making the CGI good won't make more people see the movie so they don't bother.

Too much CGI backgrounds and people in these films. Hard to take it seriously given how awkwards actors are trying to act around it. The digital format doesn't make things better with how lightning works. This is why MoS from 2013 looks better than any of these modern capeshits. Ton of scenes on-location. Shot on film. No blatant reshoots. Simple formula that no capeshit seems to want to replicate in 2017.

Based

>Not spending money on pointless crap that doesn't improve the product is business 101.
But it improves the film substantially. It's just that Marvel are lucky enough that critics and fanboys are sucking their dicks raw for them to care. But it would absolutely result in a better film if they shot on location and preferrably with film and not digital.

>yet Sup Forums will still defend the star wars prequels for doing the exact same shit

Marvel films look terrible, for the budget they have you would think they would atleast look somewhat good

btw why did they CGI'd cate blanchett's face? she is not that old is she?

>Not spending money on pointless crap that doesn't improve the product is business 101.
But it would improve the product. What you should've said is
>Not spending money on pointless crap that doesn't increase profits is business 101.
Marvel drones are low IQ subhuman sheep who will flock to see these cinematic dumpster fires with no care of the quality.

>But it improves the film substantially.
Not the profits of the film though, which is the most important thing
Disney aren't in the business of making films, they're in the business of making money.
They'd release 2 hours of a blank white screen if they thought people would see it.

yeah this

And in spite of that, why the fuck they never change lenses my god.
Look at that close up and look at this.
See how Clark stands off the background because the shallow DOF. You would think that if all of your backgrounds are CGI you would be smart enough to hide them in the blurriness of a more substantial focal lenght

>Not the profits of the film though, which is the most important thing
yeah cant believe how greedy disney want to be. they have guaranteed financial success for every single film and they choose to go even cheaper

Prequel Episode 1 is how these films should look but in truth they all look like Episode 2.

>Not the profits of the film though, which is the most important thing
Not to us, the viewers. If fans cared more about the quality of MCU films and less about MCU profits, maybe Disney would gets its fingers outta its ass and make something good again. Just compare the nuWars to MCU. Hate on them as much as you want but TLJ was actually cinema. It was worth the money I spent on it simply because it felt like I was watching actual film and not videogame cutscenes. Something I feel with MCU all the time.

Imagine being an actor in today's hollywood. You have to stand in front of a green screen, you have no scenery to interact with and props that are meant to represent things all look like nerf toys so the CGI can make them look cool. It must be awful.

I am in no way a filmmaker and I do this.
You don't even have to change lens, literally just zoom instead of putting your camera closer to the subject.
I have a 50 - 135 mm lens, and I just set it to 50 for flat shots and 135 for close ups

I don't like any of the prequels, but Episode 1 is the least bad imo because it at least still looks like an actual fucking movie

2 and 3 are basically videogame shit

Another thing that puzzled me with Ragnarok was how obvious some interactions were copy-pasted. Like it was extremely obvious the actors weren't even in the same room but tried to make it so with camera tricks. It looked extremely off. It was very weird.

An example
The Revenant x Thor Ragnorak
Which one made more money?
The Revanant only used natural shots and the director even waited several days for the right kind of light

>Not to us, the viewers.
To you maybe, but I guarantee if you showed to any marvel fan they would have literally no problem with it at all. They give no shits about the quality of a movie, as long as there are CGI fight scenes and quips they're happy.

There are ton of Marvel fans who are well aware of the poor production values of these films don't kid yourself. But Disney knows how to keep these people quiet. You think critics didn't see the film has so many embarrassingly poor shots? They knew but at the same time a negative review against Disney has consequences as a film critic.

>There are ton of Marvel fans who are well aware of the poor production values of these films don't kid yourself.
And yet they continue to pay for the movie.
Do you think Disney give any shits what people think of the movie after they see it? As long as they paid for it, and will pay for the next one, Disney can keep pumping movies out without any effort