AVADA

AVADA...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/_OJ3x78Sk8c
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

was he really planning to kill harry on broad daylight right outside Dumbledore's office?

it was a different time

inb4 avada kedullest

if he did that, Voldemort would win

Didn't Voldemort need Harry's blood to be revived though?

STRETCHED HIS LEGS

No. He could have used the blood of any of his enemies.

Could have used other horcruxes. He needed Harrys blood for a workaround for Lilys protective magic.

Where is it?

could harry even die from that? isnt he invincible the whole time on account of being a horcrux? except for the chamber of secrets i guess

I'm pretty sure living horcruxes are more vulnerable. I remember someone saying that it's odd that he made Nagini one, because of that. Must have been Dumbledore.

This. I remember kids playing out in the streets outside Hogwarts because there were so few cars.
People would leave there dormitory doors open all day and you could just walk in.
Different times.
We had a lot less, but in many ways a lot more.

>it's another "No!" pasta thread episode

>no pasta yet
Voldemort got him

KEBABRA

KEdullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

No blasted pastas today! No sir. Not one single bloody pasta! Not one!

Wow. Awful intro.

>ABRACADAVER BITCH!

DEH!

underrated

Why can't he grow up?

GOT WANDS THAT BLOW THE WALL
CURSE THEM ALL OUT
FUCK THE FALLOUT
WORD TO BLACK I BET THEY GITTY

Too late faggot!!

Checked

why do you keep posting this in these threads?

Harry potter universe was so fucking stupid they had so much magic to make their lives better but everyone lived like rats in a shithole like London i dont get how this series got so big

what drawback exists from using this spell?

It's illegal, and earns you a life sentence.

Life in prison and moral implications; outside of the laws of society though? none at all, must've been a murderfest back in the day before magic police was created.

"No!"

based

Avara Kerraba

Wottice

If Tom Riddle from the diary actually finished stealing Ginny's life to become real, would that mean there'd be two Voldemorts? Or would the real one's soul go into the diary one's?

It will kill the one it's aimed at, and by committing murder in the wizarding world, you tear your soul apart.

I posed this question to a friend the other day. We both have no fucking clue.

lol i dont know dumbledore is gay and hermoine is black tho

and there are jews but its not the goblins

no-one sleeps in the grounds anymore...

-CADO

I always thought they lived like shit because they're weaker than normal humans. Seriously, how the fuck would a wizard ever compete with a gun? It can shoot a hundred avadacadavo's a minute without any of the "muh soul suffering", no casting time, and almost no training. That's not even counting military vehicles and shit like that.

Voldy was disembodied in CoS so most likely he will be absorbed by Diary Riddle

It's fucking magic though. Shield spells, etc.

It’s really is one giant retcon/plot hole fest. The series has almost no internal consistency whatsoever. Whenever you pose this kind of fridge logic bullshit to the fans they always conjure up some weak excuse, normally involving some kind of hand waiving deus ex Machina magic.

Deh

>be wizard
>split your soul
>make your own body a horcrux
>gain an extra life

>It can shoot a hundred avadacadavo's a minute
You would be dead before you draw your gun.

Why? Wouldn't they be dead before they draw their wand? Even if they did draw their wand, they'd still have to say the incantation.
Do they ever use a spell to block a physical object in the books? Is there a limit to blocking spells? Harmione uses a ton of protection magic in the 7th book when they're going around looking for shit, do these spells have some sort of duration? How long does a "protego totalis" even last? How does King Crimson work?

>Make tiny pebble a horcrux
>Throw it in the Pacific Ocean

BAZINGA!

>your horcrux gets bored and makes itself wash up on shore to go look for harry potter.
The diary kind of proved that they have a mind of their own, and will do selfish things that aren't advantageous to the real voldemort.

They use shield charms extensively when they're dueling other wizards(Death Eaters)

"The Shield Charm (Protego) is a term applied to several varieties of charms. They create a magical barrier to deflect physical entities and spells, in order to protect a certain person or area. Conjurations may sometimes rebound directly off it back towards the caster or in other cases, may ricochet off in other directions or dissipate as soon as they hit the shield."

>How long does a "protego totalis" - It's just Protego. You're referring to "Petrificus Totalis"

Fuck sake. I green texted all of that. I guess I just actually get to sleep now. You get the gist though.

I wasn't. They use "protego totalum" multiple times in the last book when they're setting up camp. There's also "protego maxima" that Dumbledor uses to protect all of Hogwarts. Why not just use the strongest one all the time?

>lock pebble in a steel box
>keep doing it until you have multiple boxes within a boxes that's half the size of a human
>launch it into space
that'll teach that fookin bloody pebble

Uses more mana

He needed his seed. He was gonna give harry the succ.

Should have had abra cadabra maxima that killed like 30 people at once. Would have made voldy a bit more scary.

Wouldn't it be more efficient to put your soul into a ranga?

>Voldemort was raised by a single mother
Even Rowling knows how horrible single mothers are.

Reminder that Harry Potter is aboslute dogshit, Emma Watson can not act and OP is a happa

>make ultimate killing spell
>literally call it Abra cadabra

>"hurr durr Hermione is black"
>described as pale more than once in the books

it's a child's book that got famous way out of proportion
the feminazi had no thought whatsoever writting these books, no one would assume it would become that famous

the only difference of rowling and meyer is that rowling writes for children, not 40yo sexually fustraded women

She melanin enriched herself through potions to achieve Yakub levels of intellect.

>not east hastings

I feel like diary riddle would have been much more powerful in comparison to the resurrected voldemort.

youtu.be/_OJ3x78Sk8c

kek

"No!"

...

"No!"

He was raised in an orphanage

How does splitting your soul even work, like do you choose how much you rip off and shove into a horcrux?
or is it like an even 50/50 split, so by the time Voldemort accidentally made Harry one he was only operating on 1/7th of a soul.

No one really knew, Voldemort was the first person to try it. You're only supposed to make one horcrux, like a lich's phylactery.

If you walked in Dumbledore's office whilst he was ramming his wand into a Gryffindor twink, pointed your wand at the said twink and utter AVADA KEDAVR- , omitting the final 'A', would the twink die and Dumbledore be dragged to Azkaban for fucking a corpse?

If you kill someone using it then it's guaranteed death. It doesn't appear to be very humane either, as anyone who dies by it seems to be in agony. Your intentions direct your magic in many cases and even if you kill someone with a stunning spell it's not objectively murder though you might still be punished for it. If you kill with that spell it tears your soul in half, it's dark magic and it corrupts you. There aren't many spells that have a corrupting influence like that, even the other unforgivable curses can be used with out consequences.

...

In the second book he doesn't really say "Avada", it just says that he was about to attack Harry. They added this in the movie because the year the second movie came out, the fourth book was out and it's the first time we hear about the unforgivable curses and learn that Lucius is a Death Eater.

Why were wizards ok with teenagers drinking butterbeer when there's alcohol in that stuff? They drink it age 13 what the fuck?

They were in Scotland

He could have saved the whole franchise by ridding it of the insufferable Gary Stu, and the terrible, 45 year old looking child actor who played him.

Fair enough actually

they weren't amerilards

Hey fuck you man, she is cool and can knock up a great lemon meringue pie.

And the "author" also approved all illustrations and the casting of Emma Watson. Rowling, and all her "liberal" fans, are race baiting soulless imbeciles.

this is why we need to have a ban on assault wands

Film Theory (I know shutup) uses the 50/50 model, which ends with Harry having like 1.7% Voldemort in him

I think with enough magical knowledge you could choose how much soul to put in, but that's speculation

In the book he just garbles out part of an unknown spell before Dobby reks him

>lazy intro
>no Clifford for President image
0/10 user

No one needs a dragon heart-string core!

I think there would be two. See while for sure Rowling was a hack who didn't know what she was writing, horcruxes are not exactly common magic and even among those that dabbled anything more than 1 was unheard of. So when it came down to it even the most knowledgeable on the subject probably would be guessing at that point. If I am not mistaken, the diary is probably his first and most powerful horcrux. It has actual 50% of his soul in It since it was the first split. Probably why it was so much more "alive" than the rest. They never really do explain how a horcrux keeps one alive in the instance of death anyway though.

nigga just use against everyone then???

D R O P P E D
R
O
P
P

E
D

>They never really do explain how a horcrux keeps one alive in the instance of death anyway though.
Nigga it’s a fucking phylactery, it doesn’t need an explanation. It should be obvious that you can’t die while your soul still exists on Earth.

Why didn't Dumbledore just call the Eagles and have them take the horcruxes to Harry?

Voldemort wasn’t aware Harry was a horcrux- but Dumbledore keeps referring to each horcrux as a continual “split” of the soul. That implies each horcrux receives an incrementally smaller piece.

What’s weird is it still seems like each portion is a significant amount. Dumbledore says that the fact Voldemort didn’t notice Harry was a horcrux is a sign of how utterly mangled his soul was by the time he attacked Harry and his parents

No I think he was invincible to Voldemort until the ritual in the graveyard but you could have just shot the cunt and that would have been that.