Hello Sup Forums. I have to write a report on a climate change denial story for uni. I'm in STEM, it's for an elective.
Since I'm not a retard that denies climate change, I don't really know where to look. I'm sure lots of crazy shit would come up on Google, but I want to see the "best" anti-climate change stories from the #1 image board for right wing conspiracies.
Other urls found in this thread:
nas.org
bbc.com
wattsupwiththat.com
climatedepot.com
en.wikipedia.org
forbes.com
twitter.com
4plebs is a goldmine
thanks i found some good stuff in there
>denial
>denies
Just say heretic. You know you want to.
Notice how they're always American.
The climate change tomorrow faggot
>A FUCKEN LEAF
...
...
...
>anti-climate change stories
Don't even know what those are. What are fishing for exactly?
They were already posted.
...
>the world has warmed more the past 100 years than during any other point in human history
I always hear people claim that
find out what the #2 and #3 centuries were
no one ever seems to know that answer
I'm curious
Watch some Stephan Molymeme on climate change. He's got a couple vids on the issue.
>the world has warmed more the past 100 years than during any other point in human history
kek
There were prehistoric warming periods.
bbc.com
They took millions of years to happen, not decades.
I need text format.
stop being vague
what was the 2nd highest warming during a century
You should really read the sticky, newfag.
If climate change is real then whI can I still see polar bears outside my house check mate.
Not an argument
>stop being vague
No one is being vague you faggot. There were many ancient warming periods.
wattsupwiththat.com
#2 is Permian warming
#3 is Ordovician warming
> LEAF..EVERY FUCKING TIME.
Oh, dear.
Strange things going on in the scientific community right now OP
Still a logical fallacy. Did you just arrive from reddit?
Everyone seems to forget the balmy warming period during the medieval middle ages. Fucking leafman off yourself with a leafblower.
Climate change is not a hoax, the fear mongering of it is.
That fear has become the new god of the left peoples and used to justify their political goals of more control and more power.
Its a strategy which ultimately seeks to cause a voluntary genocide the likes the world hasn't seen since Mao and Stalin's self inflicted famines.
The fact of the matter is that the globe warming has been, is now, and will be great benefit to humanity. Why? because with global warming comes increased precipitation. So hotter and wetter means what? More plants, less harsh winters. We trade SoCal and AZ desertification for a arable Nunavut and Siberia.
seems like a pretty simple request
if people can definitively say "this is the largest, quickest warming during a century in the history of modern man", I want to know what the 2nd and 3rd quickest were
>I want to know what the 2nd and 3rd quickest were
I just fucking told you, you fucking retard.
>Climate change is not a hoax, the fear mongering of it is.
This
Also this more or less makes "co2" issues associated with climate change a future fuel source
You can use all the sources he cites if you want.
tell me the centuries
how much did they warm during those 100 year periods?
how does that compare to the past 100 years?
here is a good resource:
climatedepot.com
I didn't know humans were around in the permian and octavian eras you fucking idiot.
Are you stupid? Do you think we can know the exact century for something that happened millions of years ago?
Tell me the exact century that the dinosaurs went extinct.
Tell me the exact century that Homo sapiens left Africa.
Fucking retard. When was the last time you read a nonfiction book?
That's irrelevant to his question you moron.
...
>Muh global religio- I mean warming!
A
FUCKING
LEAF
>THE DERPS
- only "God" can change the planet "he" created
- intelligent design
- it's a science community-Bilderburglar conspiracy
- it's a chink hoax (drumpf)
- it's the normal ebb and flow of historical weather
- we're in an Ice Age
>THE SUBSTANCE
- the CO2 witch hunt (electric cars etc.) is to stave of 'peak oil' shortages
- it's a money-making scheme, as methane is hardly ever mentioned (*x25~50 GWP than CO2; cows make it; forests that absorb it are felled for the cows...)
- the horse bolted, the 'run-away effect' is unstoppable (*see: Chasing Ice, 2012)
>THE RED PILL
- AGW is happening, to be sure
- the modelling to predict it is in flux and non existent past a few decades back (*hence the short-term inaccuracies often sighted by deniers)
- it's past the point of no return (questionable mitigation is the only way to combat it)
- if they really wanted to do something, they would ban red meat, even meat in general; home fireplaces (x365 CO2 of cars emissions); nations would stop selling coal to poos and chinks etc.
- it's a short term money-making push for what will likely be a extinction level event played out over a couple of generations
- Mars has become the new black because eggheads know we are already dead, Ken.
Fuck off nigger.
then how can people say with such force and know-how that THIS IS THE QUICKEST WARMING IN A 100 YEAR PERIOD
haven't you heard that claim?
Then there's that huge nuclear explosion in the sky that makes daytime warmer than night that has an effect also
Notice how we're the hub of all technological progress.
How is it a logical fallacy? He's bringing exactly the right kind of evidence. Bring your evidence that climate change is caused by men.
Oh wait
>You can't.
They know because the other warming periods were so much slower. Orders of magnitude slower. It took millions of years to go up 1 degree.
Dumbass.
Notice how you're not.
en.wikipedia.org
How do they know?
Oh wait, we know they weren't.
See
Burn yourself, leaf
You can't even interpret basic charts. You're stupid. I bet you work in retail or are a NEET.
Maybe you should be doing a paper that bring into question the certainty of man made climate change having any 100% proof.
That's a logical fallacy
see
Intellectual property =/= Technological progress.
Sure is an argument.
You sure proved you were right with that baseless insult!
>disregard scholarship
>acquire jpgs/pngs
Actually it's the exact opposite of a logical fallacy, because I used all of the world's data, and he didn't.
There is no better indicator for technological progress.
>It took millions of years to go up 1 degree.
now you're just making stuff up
>You can't even interpret basic charts.
Said the pot to the kettle.
Being hot=//=warming up
Those 'warm periods' were local anomalies.
Your meme graph lacks a source.
This is reddit-tier shitposting. C'mon bud, step up your tinfoil hat game.
You made a non-argument and did the exact fallacy you cited here.
Can't read and can't use Google. Filtered.
>Your meme graph lacks a source.
Learn how to read.
The source is on the graph, you blind cunt.
...
It's relevant. The statistics are the opposite of your assertion of
from google
shows a 4 to 5 C temp raise about 15k years ago
...
>canadian intellectuals
A remark from Maurice Strong, who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.”
Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.)
Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick said: “A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”
In 1988, a former Canadian Minister of the Environment told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”
Speaking at the 2000 U.N. Conference on Climate Change in the Hague, former President Jacques Chirac of France said: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.”