Christopher Nolan : Under budget and ahead of schedule

He really is one of the few directors that is given freedom to do what he wants with a large budget, isn't he?

The reason for this is actually because he doesn't use CGI and always comes in under budget.

This is one of my favorite articles about Christopher Nolan if anyone is interested.

theguardian.com/film/2014/nov/04/-sp-christopher-nolan-interstellar-rebooted-blockbuster

This was written during the build-up to Interstellar before its release. On the topic of budget and control, here are some relevant excerpts:

>Like Spielberg and James Cameron before him, Nolan is one of only a handful of film-makers who can walk into a studio with an idea and exit with $200m to make it. Nolan’s movies have grossed more than $3.5bn worldwide, and his last four films [The Prestige, The Dark Knight, Inception, The Dark Knight Rises] have come in under budget. When Interstellar was finished, Nolan returned what he called a “substantial” amount of money to Paramount.

>“What he realised very early on was that the moment you give the studios an excuse to come in, you’ve lost it,” said Emma Thomas, Nolan’s wife and co-producer, who first met him when he was a student at University College London – studying English but spending all his spare time in the basement of the Bloomsbury theatre, hunched over the college’s Steenbeck editing suite, piecing together his first low-budget shorts. “We watched it happen,” Thomas said. “The moment you go over budget, you’ve lost the creative control than an obsessive director like Chris needs. He’s always been extremely strategic about it.”

It's not specifically talked about in this article, I can't find the original article in which he does talk about it, but large scale CGI is incredibly expensive in comparison to using props and practical effects. You guys know T.A.R.S. and C.A.S.E., the box robots from Interstellar right? Largely practical effects.

youtu.be/iN9gdOZ45D8

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/3xHkBRtVNE0
independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/interstellar-christopher-nolan-started-a-lucrative-side-business-selling-corn-grown-on-set-9822607.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Continued
As a side note, it really shows the due diligence and preparation that Nolan and other good directors put into their movies during the pre-production and not try to do during filming or post production.) Which is much cheaper than paying a company to render a full sequence of CGI shots and won't be ready for review for months on end. Anyone see the Overwatch shorts that Blizzard puts out now and again? That quality of CGI costs approximately $1 million per finished minute. So simply by choosing to do a practical effect and supplementing that with careful planning, you can save a lot of money. To quote another article:

>"The anxiety about the economics of a film is crushing," says Nolan, who believes there are ways to alleviate pressure from studios. "I chose to always be on or ahead of schedule and on or ahead of budget."

>One example of his punctual production was the opening airplane sequence of The Dark Knight Rises, which Nolan said was the sequence he was most proud of in any of his films. Nolan explained the shots were the result of months of planning that culminated in two days of shooting, even though they had scheduled it for five.

With practical effects you can do something like this. You can do something that was supposed to take 5 days and cut it down to 2. And that saves money. To get back to my original point I'll use one last quote from Nolan:

Continued...
>"I do think right now it's difficult for original films to get made," Nolan said, alluding to Hollywood's penchant for producing entities with built-in audiences through sequels, comic book remakes and book adaptations. Where it was once possible to bank on a star consistently pulling in crowds movie after movie, Nolan pointed out that is no longer that case: "It's hard to base a film around casting - there are no commercial guarantees."

There's no guarantee of commercial success or profit when making a movie. Any one of a hundred things could mess it up. But something that Christopher Nolan does that makes the studio trust him with their money, something he does to control them instead of the other way around, is he comes in under budget. With that, he is giving them at least one guarantee: He will save them money even if he doesn't turn them a profit. So that is why he is one of the few directors that is given freedom to do what he wants with a large

Based Nolan saving blockbusters.

Judging by some scenes in his movies he is also a first-take kind of guy, which I guess helps speed things up

I wonder there are some sloppy elements because of it(like TDKR) but movies like memento , The prestige and Dunkirk have very little if at all no bad scenes. I guess it varies according to the size of the project.

I really like how his films utilize so many practical effects. I honestly wonder why films that are so cgi heavy even bother with any live elements sometimes like actors instead of just voice actors.

especially so when you working with IMAX cameras. Need to redub dialogue as it's too loud

Indeed he is probably he best director working in the big blockbuster range.

>3 takes maximum
>brother writes script for peanuts
>no reshoots LOL
Nolan is a lazy fucker

OH IT SHOWS

If any*.

He produces probably the best looking blockbusters out there outside of maybe Denis.(and I am restricting it to blockbusters). None of his films ever feel cheap.

>One example of his punctual production was the opening airplane sequence of The Dark Knight Rises, which Nolan said was the sequence he was most proud of in any of his films. Nolan explained the shots were the result of months of planning that culminated in two days of shooting, even though they had scheduled it for five.
I can't tell real life from memes any more, I'm lost

Of the last 4 flicks only one has been co-written by Jonathan(it's TDKR)

Some of the Interstellar miniatures were atrocious, especially in the black hole.

Ridley Scott also comes under buget but his philosophy is that he doesn't pay for the movie so the studio can eviscerate it and then he'll get a home release. Hence Kingdom of Heaven and his early (and continued) support for home release extras.

The Martian came in 2 million under budget and a couple of days earlier. That's what storyboarding, a good visual imagination and a multi-camera setup for everything gets you. On Ridley's set, work stopped at 6 PM, no exceptions, and Damon still got an Oscar nomination.
When he did the reshoots and editing for All The Money, he still got his 8 hours sleep every night lol.

I thought this was old news. Nolan has gone on to say it was his best action work.

Maybe he knows about the memes.

>Chris Nolan can just show up and get $150 million for a 3 hour science fiction film about space colonization
>Del Taco has to near-completely self finance his $20 million fantasy film

It's not fair

well, if we take the dialogue away, it's a pretty memorable stunt

Ridley has his sloppy moments as well especially in Gladiator and exodus Gods and kings.

I guess as the scope of the film increase so does mistakes but these guys are probably the best at it.

Are referring to the black hole itself because that was apparently highly accurate according to the scientists themselves.

>investing in beaners

good luck with that

is jackson allergic to shampoo or something?

Yeah it's disappointing but I his blockbusters weren't as successful as they should've been. If Hellboy flicks and Pacific Rim were huge successes , he would be getting projects left and right.

If Del Taco movies made billions he wouldnt need to

Fair enough. I’d say all of his modern movies feel “under schedule” though.

This. I still appreciate the guy, but IT SHOWS

Second unit?

you're a big meme

Pacific Rim, Hellboy, and Hellboy 2 barely turned profits. Inception and TDK trilogy made insane bank.

lamo, someone post the webm of Bane punching CIA

I was referring to the whole dismembering the plane thing
Poor Nolan-3000 hasn't quite figured out how human beings work, cut him some slack

Since it's been confirmed he is not doing bond, what would be his next project?

prometheus

He spent millions

I really hope Nolan is going to take the Oscar instead of Del Taco

Mate Prometheus looked great. Visuals were the least of its problems.

Come on giving taco some slack. He needs this more than Nolan. Chris has also said that he is not interested in the oscars(though he considers them a privilege)

Based

To entertain billions

Fuck off with these reddit spaced posts about a reddit director

This board is filled with black panther and other MCU shitposts. This is a breath of fresh air compared to that crap.

>Chris has also said that he is not interested in the oscars
Well he's not gonna say he cares if he knows he's going to loose. Also, can I get the sauce ?

youtu.be/3xHkBRtVNE0
Oscar part starts at 19:45

That was the films problem though. The best thing about the film was the interior of the spaceship. It was stunning in a couple of scenes. It seemed like the only two things the film actually was interested in was the Engineer and his chair (since it was the throw back and entire link to the other movies) and the prometheus' interior. Everything else was just an excuse to film a handful of scenes in those two. If anything visuals really were a problem for that film due to that.

>Fuck off with these reddit spaced posts about a reddit director

Nobody cared about my posts until I put on the reddit spaces

U mad 4chanboi?

Is it noticeable a dubbed scene or could pass without notice if its well done? Im not a native speaker, thats why Im asking

Reddit spacing meme was actually created by reddit to sew distrust on Sup Forums. Dumb cuck

George Miller says hi.

Oh, you think shit posts is your ally.

But you merely adopted the shit posts;

I was born in it, moulded by it.

I didn't see the /r/thedonald until I was already a man, by then it was nothing to me but BLINDING!

Where is the home release for Prometheus and Covenant? Prometheus Agent 9 Special edition is great

Guillermo Del Toro used a lot of CGI for Pacific Rim and still finished it under budget.

>Admits to not giving a shit about the oscars and knows they don't give a shit about his films as well
>Admits his goal is to appeal as wide an audience as possible

And they say Nolan is pretentious. He basically admits to being a better Michael Bay.

Nolans a hack

Miller has made what? One film in the last 20 years?

thanks

What I am gathering is that Taco, Scott and Nolan are better businessmen than directors?

Pretty sure Both Nolan and Del Toro are budget conscious directors. I mean they both started out on small passion projects where they had to think about how to effectively spend every single dollar in their meager funds.

The batman series after batman begins is shovelware but everything else he has done is kino

Is that why Zack Snyder movies always have bloated budgets while at the same time have wonky CGI? He straight up started doing studio movies from the very beginning.

Del Taco is a hack. Well...Nolan is a hack too so I guess Del Taco is a super Hack. All his movies are meme shit, the only decent one is Pan's Labyrinth and he is retroactively ruining it with retarded gems like this one:

>The Pale Man represents all institutional evil feeding on the helpless. It's not accidental that he is a) Pale b) a Man. He's thriving now.

Scott definitely.
But some of his tricks are common sense.
He uses multiple camera set-ups for all his big scenes and even in dialogue heavy sequences to capture the shot and the reaction shot in the same take.

That's not just efficient, it also helps get the most out of the actors.

mainstream flick director jizzing exposition everywhere just to make sure underaged and retarded viewers get everything in fear of being viewed as pretentious
*pierces paper with pen*

He's big on not shooting anything that won't make it to post. So if it doesn't fit, it's not even shot.

Every film has it to some degree.

Go back, you absolute fucking retard

MoS was an ultrasuperpowered cgifest and it barely has 1 or 2 wonky scenes in like 2 hours of action. One is where Zod spins Clark by his cape, the other is one where they exchange punches. The rest of the movie looks really fine. In fact looks much better than more recent movies like Black Panther, Spider-man or Civil War.

Same with BvS. There are only a few doomsday wonky scenes but the rest of the movie is top tier blockbuster kino

too busy cunnyposting on Sup Forums

yes he is excellent at appealing to brainlet ideals and emotions.

unfortunately he has no desire to make actual quality cinema because he realized the money is in brainlets.

>In fact looks much better than more recent movies like Black Panther, Spider-man or Civil War.
Why bring in such a low bar?
Compare it so say TDK or Hellboy 2.

And I am talking about BvS. I feel like several batmobile scenes and Doomsday CGI were weak as fuck as well superman pulling the ship scene,the kryptonite gas, etc....

The thing is all of them cost about 220+million. While something like Hellboy 2 cost 85 million, TDK cost 185 million, Fury Road cost about 175 million and BR2049 cost 150 million.

Well I guess the decision not have CGI fuckfest climax can save a lot of money.

I must be the only one who unironically thinks Nolan makes good movies.
>Dunkirk
One of the best suspense films of last year
>interstellar
Good until the retarded ending
>TDKR
Mediocre but good memes
>inception
Kino
>dark knight
Best capeshit movie by a wide margin
>the prestige
Bretty gud
>batman begins
Second best capeshit movie
>memento
Good

0 bad movies. They’re not all kinos but they’re all watchable and memorable

independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/interstellar-christopher-nolan-started-a-lucrative-side-business-selling-corn-grown-on-set-9822607.html
>Based Nolan coming up with ways of making bank even before the movie is out

Obviously can't risk losing any more hair

Absolute fucking Kek. I don't know about filmmaking but Nolan will always be remembered for the memes.

>Inception
>Kino
lol

>All memorable
I like some of his movies but cannot think of a single one I found memorable in the slightest. That's the main problem his films have for me. Absolutely zero rewatch value

>"I phoned Zack [Snyder] and said, "Well how much did you grow?" and he told me they grew 300 acres and that it cost X amount, so we grew about 500 acres of corn and actually sold it and ended up making a profit off it!"
That's a big crop

I agree with Superman pulling the ship, but the car chasing was great.

Also, for the budget keep in mind BvS final version is 3 hours long (original cut was 4 hours long) and is cgi heavy unlike TDK. Dollar per dollar, BvS is much more cheaper than TDK considering the scope of the action in BvS and length of the movie.

>The production team had to grow a corn field especially for the scenes on Matthew McConaughey's character's farm, and after filming was complete sold off a "pretty good crop".

>Explaining how he sought advice from Man of Steel director Zack Snyder on cinematic cornfields, Nolan told The Hollywood Reporter: "Luckily, Zack had grown a bunch of corn, so I said, 'How much can you really grow practically?'

Based Snyder

Del Toro generally rolls his directing and writing fees back into his films too, think Blade 2 was the only one he didn't