We've always trusted LA times over others, because it's the only one that was accurate for Obama, and it's the only one accurately sampling instead of ((( +8 dems))).
Aside from Nate Silver of course, who also was accurate for Obama. But then again he gave Trump a 2% chance of winning GOP and was wrong about EVERYTHING.
Didn't you hear Newt Gingrich? We have two
P A R A L L E L
U N I V E R S E S
Fucking amazing.
He is within the margin of error of ONE FUCKING POLL.
Check out the other polls like WSJ, ABC, CNN etc.
this is just the obamacare impact. the people in this poll did not even react to the FBI yet.
prepare for a massive rise in the polls over the next days.
He's demolished her so conclusively he beat the rigging
LA Times
UPI C VOTER
People's Pundit Daily
Investors Business Daily
That's 4 polls not 1. I know counting is hard for Hillarykins.
At least "Hillarykins" can count poll results correctly.
I WANT SOMETHING ELSE
TO GET ME THROUGH THIS
SEMI CHARMED KINDA LIFE
LA Times is more accurate than all of those (see chart, it was called RAND in 2012)
WE CAN DRIVE IT HOME
WITH ONE HEADLIGHT