They're up now so let's get cracking.
WIKILEAKS - PODESTA EMAIL DUMP #22
Ryan Collins
Other urls found in this thread:
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
twitter.com
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
applied-survey-methods.com
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com
washingtonpost.com
wikileaks.org
twitter.com
Noah White
More on her and Bill's judgement.
Samuel Rogers
Professors at Georgetown University bitching about Scalia after he died.
Jaxson Bailey
Warning about Turkish donations to shape policy
Adam Reyes
...
Andrew Lee
Making fun of native americans / Warren!
Good one to spread to the SJWs
Justin Hall
Not sure about legality, but coordination with Super PACs.
Kevin Peterson
More exposing Glenn Thrush as Clinton sycophant
wikileaks.org
wikileaks.org
Aaron Clark
Coordination with Super PACs is illegal. IF she gets indicted on the server this time, all this proof about coordination with PACs will sink the PACs including CTR.
This is good.
Josiah Fisher
proof they oversample on purpose
Nathaniel Barnes
From the team that brought you the Podesta leaks #1 to 21...
Brayden Carter
These people are 50X more obsessed with race than Sup Forums
Robert Gutierrez
wow it's fucking nothing
Samuel Gray
I would like more eyeballs on this one, please.
Reading it now, trying to make sense of the replies.
In it they're trying to get their story straight for a NY Times article in March 2015 on Clinton's private server emails.
Kayden Carter
stfu or gtfo
Ethan Long
no need mate it's fucking nothing
Nolan Lee
Much like your entire existence.
Ayden Nelson
Damage control and possible leveraging of NYT staff over an article on Hillary's meme server.
Not especially big or corrupt, but disgusting.
Xavier Martinez
lol it's fucking nothing again
Kevin Cook
>wikihype
Cameron Nelson
This. Why do you guys even waste your time looking at nothing relevant?
Grasping at straws if you ask me.
Colton Hall
I agree. I'm a Trump supporter but these leaks always amount to nothing useful
Brandon Miller
>samefagging
Xavier Lopez
Not gonna lie, former Trump voter here. This is fucking hilarious watching Trump crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let this guy get the nuclear codes.
Cameron Harris
GO AFTER NEW CGI E-MAILS. THEN WE LOOK AT MINOR. THE FOUNDATION IS A PRIORITY.
Owen Rogers
Really faggot? Need to step your shill game up you silly bitch.
Landon Green
...
Jeremiah Fisher
Reminder that viewing these private e-mails is ***ILLEGAL*** for normal citizens. We should wait for CNN to tell us what's in them because they will not be incriminated by viewing them as professional journalists.
Asher Adams
GUYS GET IN HERE OCNTACT LOCAL REPRESNTATIVES ASKING FOR SUBPOENA
Eli Adams
This. I don't want to go to prison guys. let's leave these alone
Hunter Lee
>wikileaks.org
Clearly pandering to Wall Street in the speech.
Benjamin Garcia
I used to fucking hate her and troll the fuck out of her account..
Michael Hall
HE GAVE SOMEONE ELSE ACCESS TO HIS EMAIL ON PURPOSE
Leo Ward
Wow, further down in this one:
>We have has a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed. While we should have a larger conversation in the near future about a broader strategy for reengaging the beat press that covers HRC, for this we think we can achieve our objective and do the most shaping by going to Maggie.
Fucking Politico
Hunter Allen
...
Kevin Brown
CTR pls go
Charles Brown
Luke Murphy
>replying to your own post
Joshua Ross
merely an act
Grayson Collins
wikileaks.org
Are they still doing this?
Kevin Martinez
Listen, Mohammad. I know Shariah law doesn't include campaign laws but please try to understand
Evan Nguyen
When will these niggers learn?
Nicholas Stewart
>Are they still doing this?
yes
we dont know if on purpose, but they still do
you can check out the polling data of liberal outlets and they all ask mostly women, mostly democrat-areas, mostly during daytime (ie, workers, who tend to vote republican, are misrepresented in detriment of welfare recipients) etc
Ryder Peterson
>tfw you troll as a shill but it makes you feel too mush like shit that you have to drop hints to let people know you're a troll and not CTR scum
Easton Reyes
Here's one from from 2008 with a suggestion of people based on race and minority status over experience to serve in a future obama administration
Liam Jenkins
wikileaks.org
> I do believe that this starts with alignment on our campaign culture and a > paradigm shift in the old Clinton M.O. I know HRC believes the more > people you talk to the better but it simply isn’t. Especially for her. We > really need to tighten who she talks to and make sure that Huma/schedulers > route most people through high level folks on the campaign so that they are > being listened to. > > > > I think Robby rightly says that a lot of our leaks are coming through job > searches we’re doing. I think every conversation has to either begin or > end by telling people if you’re name appears in print as a result of the > conversations the job is off the table.
Noah Morales
Neera again questioning Hillary and Bill Clinton's judgement on hiring Brock.
wikileaks.org
>Sometimes HRC/WJC have the worst judgement
David Green
2008 but this can help to the historial.
Matthew Young
Polling on Sanders done in Feb of this year. Searching for negatives to hit him on in IA and NH.
Caleb Sanders
shit, here's the link
Polling on Sanders done in Feb of this year. Searching for negatives to hit him on in IA and NH.
wikileaks.org
excel spreadsheet attached to that one.
Ian Fisher
This is for the campaigns internal polls. Do not get hung up on it, keep searching.
Elijah Stewart
>provided you are not shopping at the liquor store
Thomas Wilson
>Two names that you should be aware of are *Mehmet Celebi* and *Ali Cinar*
Is this the way you out Muslims?It looks like the equivalent of (((you))) ing
Connor Rodriguez
wikileaks.org
>> On Mar 14, 2015, at 2:02 PM, Nick Merrill wrote: >> >> State just called to tell me that Mike Schmidt seems to have what appear to be summaries of some of the exchanges in the 300 emails the committee has. He shared 2 anecdotes with State, one was an exchange that HRC had with Jake about some of the media stories following the attacks, the other an exchange that HRC had with CDM and Huma on non-state.gov accounts, but that was later forwarded to a state.gov account. >> >> Again, it appears that he does not have the email but that someone, likely from the committee, is slipping him cherry-picked characterizations of the exchanges. I haven’t heard directly from Schmidt yet but will circle back when I do.
Dylan Walker
wikileaks.org
> I got fed-up, and I sent the following note to the Hillary campaign tonight. I guess that I just need to figure-out how to route their entreaties to "Trash" in my G-mail. I'm giving her my money, but they just don't stop, and they never even say "Thanks".
to which the HC staff comments, internally, with empathy:
>We got a few emails from people like this. But we needed the money.
David Morgan
Holy fuck, you cock sucking faggot. First day working for ctr?
Jayden Sullivan
Hill belives in UFO's! Reptilians confirmed!
Kevin Thomas
wikileaks.org
>few democrats have nice things to say about Hillary that aren't being payed by her
Daniel Russell
Are you going to stay in the UK when trump wins, or is that just your proxy? Hey faggit, off the clock do you support hillary?
Nolan Kelly
wikileaks.org
a very personal message from our friend neera tanden
>Sometimes HRC/WJC have the worst judgement
Nathan Powell
Really? Citation needed.
Nathan Perry
Another first day on the job. Lol
Kevin Cruz
>Would be good to add some diversity to the list of ideas people HRC is reaching out to- women, people of color, and even some ideological diversity.
>even some ideological diversity
>even
Nicholas Sanchez
Ian Jones
Weaponized autism at work. Praise based kek.
Jose Long
Hillary BEGGING for donations during the primary
wikileaks.org
>...[Hillary,] your more-than 20 pleas for even more additional contributions in the space of less than 72 hours is absurd, annoying, and unworthy of you.
>My own political career would have died on the doorstep if I had practiced these oppressive kind of campaign practices.
>P.S.: I've twice requested a button, bumper-sticker, or even a XXL t-shirt to display for you. Any chance of ever seeing them?
Isaac Anderson
wikileaks.org
neera and podesta finally agree on something:
>I mean you and I have discussed how the press is psychotic a million times.
it must be nice to be a liberal psychofantic reporter and then find out you are called names behind your back
Brayden Johnson
MWHAHAHAHA i have just found the clearest of proofs
>FYI: We are going to try to do an oversample of seniors on the poll.
Sample too small otherwise.
wikileaks.org
SPREAD THIS ONE, MAKE A MEME OR SOMETHING FFS
normies dont even need to understand how oversampling works in order to comprehend that polling companies are soooo busted with this email being public
Nathaniel Barnes
Rolling because what difference, at this point, does it make
Jonathan Gutierrez
That one seems like it could just be regarding their internal polling
Also given the date it would have been during the primary with Obama (where they would actually have an incentive to oversample seniors)
Gavin Robinson
There's nothing incriminating in that email.
They poll more seniors than necessary and then weigh those results to match demographics. They're oversampling seniors to get a more representative sample and more accurate information, not to cook the results.
If your sample size is too small, outliers can cause too much noise.
Nicholas Thomas
wikileaks.org
PODESTA WAS HACKED BY A UKRANIAN!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
James Martin
this is 100% correct. dig deeper
Ryan Morgan
so not russia? and that's from yesterday, but one of the more interesting from yesterday, imo.
Noah Garcia
>Ukraine
Crimea?
Aiden Sullivan
>If your sample size is too small, outliers can cause too much noise.
yes, that's a known problem, but you don't solve it or mitigate it by adding another distortion (ie, oversampling a specific demographic)
>That one seems like it could just be regarding their internal polling
why would they oversample if it's internal? what's the point of lying to themselves?
i'd say, regarding the content and the date, that was a hc vs bernie poll: knowing that young people tend to favor bernie i'd hazard that the polling agency ovesampled older democrats to offset it
Eli Diaz
...
Cameron Walker
BTW guys please bump the cfg thread:
I have already capped my bumping capacity there but we shouldnt let it slide further: therein is our ammo!
Jackson Sanders
Have you guys noticed alot more disinfo since the FBI thing broke?
Aaron Barnes
>why would they oversample if it's internal? what's the point of lying to themselves?
No you're misunderstanding.
They're interested in finding out what PERCENT of seniors will vote trump.
The more women they poll, the more accurate this percentage will be.
The logical flaw is when they then make assumptions about how that percentage will be represented in the voting booth.
James Williams
Is charlie baker part of the clinton campaign? If he/she is then it sounds illegal.
Jackson Harris
After they oversample, they weight the data properly.
This explains it well:
applied-survey-methods.com
Brandon Rivera
a nice Sup Forumsack meme'd it for us already (pic related)
Xavier Collins
Discussing removing a journalist from Daily Mail from the press pool
Matthew Robinson
>they weight the data properly.
>Implying anybody knows what the proper weighting should be.
Brandon Perez
LITERALLY NOTHING part 22
Charles Adams
oh, i didn't know that, i'll give it a read
thank you for telling me!
Dominic Campbell
wikileaks.org
>somethings about email server here,
Given the nature of the below involving facts that are under review by both the State Department and the select committee, I’m asking that this all be considered off the record. I say this because I want to share some of these details in an effort to better convey why we still find ourselves not clear on the core elements of this story, making it difficult to respond to your questions.
Kevin Davis
>After a tweek or two your Hillary 2016 team ran a brilliant primary
campaign. So did Trump.
>Please don't take Trump lightly. When it comes to marketing, he's on the
same level as Steve Jobs.
Nathaniel Smith
wikileaks.org
Alert because Erdogan is trying to "donate" to Democrats
So, they shouldn't take Erdogan money because of the impact that may have, but Qatar's and Saudi Arabia's is ok
I don't understand
Thomas Mitchell
Thank you for Correcting the Record shill.
Andrew Long
He put the quote on his tweeter. BASED
Elijah Scott
Woeuh lad
Kayden Taylor
Nice guy.
Landon Turner
HOLY CRAP THIS IS HIGHLY, HIGHLY ILLEGAL. FOREIGN DONATIONS DIRECTLY INFLUENCING US ELECTION.
>thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com
thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com
>thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com
thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com
Logan Miller
>XXL
Jace Cruz
>Implying anybody knows what the proper weighting should be.
It's simple mathematics.
a = results from sample (old people are a% of our sample)
b = census data (in total, old people make up b% of the population in this area)
c = weight
a*c=b
You just solve for c.
You're welcome! Keep up the fight to make America great again, Spanish bro!
Jason Sullivan
>they stack error upon error
Brandon Lee
Here's an article about the incident. His tweet about it is good too that's in the link. Apparently he covered a senator's use of prostitutes in the Dominican Republic before this happened. Seems like an actual journalist
Michael Moore
>Hillary said Hitler was right
wikileaks.org