youtube.com
Mosque occupied by French protesters against the islamisation of Europe.
I have started a channel focused on alt-right/nationalist/conservative politics in France. I make French political videos related to our movement accessible to the English-speaking world.
If you are interested in alt-right and/or French politics, don't hesitate to check this out and support this new channel !
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
There is no "alt-right" its just a meme
The alt-right, like anime, IS real.
what is alt-right
Please tell me you are kidding, there are people on Sup Forums who don't know what the alt-right is ?
...
What the fuck is that
owl man
I don't give a fuck about this guy, gtfo
Un khey qui ne connait pas zoulman
Haha, you wish, Schlomo
On peut être un khey et en avoir rien à foutre du brocante game issou
FINALLY someone who supports the alt-right omg what has Sup Forums become
Hillary's CTR goons are working overtime on here. I think a large portion of Sup Forums's more serious fascists and national socialists are spending less time here.
There is also a real debate to have on what the alt-right actually is, hardcore alt-righters are basically national socialists, whereas some milo yiannopoulos supporters will also claim to be part of the alt-right.
> alt right
fuck off cunt
An anti alt-righter on Sup Forums from panama, I can now say I have seen everything.
Was that a nigger in the video???
It's big man tyrone, a living meme beloved by all
fuck up nigger
>Blink 1488 What's My Race Again?
youtube.com
>Blink 1488 - Saddam's Song
youtube.com
>POTG: "Hillary is SO CORRUPT" at Al Smith Dinner 2016
youtube.com
>WWE: Last of the Bernie People
youtube.com
>The Snake - Donald J. Trump Karaoke
youtube.com
>Trump Cinnamon Toast Crunch Lifeguard Meme
youtube.com
>"America Has Never Stopped Being Great"
youtube.com
>Drumpf Man
youtube.com
>yeb files a complaint
youtube.com
>Milo Leads TRUMP MOB Through Chicago
youtube.com
>Nigel Farage Resigns from UKIP
youtube.com
>RNC Convention Montage
youtube.com
>Milo Yiannopoulos WAKE UP Party "Not All Muslims" Debate
youtube.com
>Code Pink Cringe Protest at RNC Convention
youtube.com
>TILL I COLLAPSE (Feat. Hill Dogg)
youtube.com
Whatever debate is really going on, Milo certainly isn't part of it. The hardcore of the Alt-Right (TRS, Richard Specer, etc.) officially renounced Milo more than a month ago now. The same goes for others, like Sargo of Akkad or Steven Crowder. People like them are simply cultural libertarians: they only care about ripping on SJWs and feminists, or criticising political correctness. But they do not acknowledge race realism, nor the problem of multiculturalism, nor the Kalergi Plan / le Grand Remplacement. They also refuse to talk about Jews.
TheRightStuff
Millennial Woes
American Renaissance
Counter Currents
NPI (Richard Spencer)
These people (and many more) are the Alt-Right
youtube.com
Also, don't forget the Jews
youtube.com
the identitarian movement still exists?
Yes it does and it is stronger than ever, it is now a well known movement in France and its idea of "grand remplacement" is now widely talked of in French political debates.
Thanks for your answer. Nevertheless, there will be more people identifying as alt-righters who support Yiannopoulos than alt-righters supporting those more hardcore alt-righters. At least it can be said that Yiannopoulos and his movement is much more mainstream and has wider support. So who holds the right to say what the alt-right is ? That's a real issue.
The problem with Milo is that he has shown that he is just a narcissistic homosexual who cares more about getting attention than actual politics or ideas.
This is very true and that really pisses me off. And the media invite him saying he is the alt-right leader. He is basically making of the alt-right only an anti-SJW culture, but I think it's more than that.
Bump
>unironically using the term alt-right
What's the issue with using the term alt-right you faggot
The term means literally nothing. It's just a made up buzzword
Whether you are right or your comments are even relevant can only be determined by identifying the true originator of the nomenclature and self-designation of the so-called "alt-right".
Just because a few storm fags denounce a few actual fags and *say* what is orthodox and who gets to be "the real" alt right doesn't mean shit - necessarily.
Unless of course the people you cite literally invented the term and identified the core tenets as being garden variety storm-faggotry.
So cite your sources or lick my butthole.
Well you better google the fuck out of this term because it means something to many. Unfortunately it looks like most alt-righters barely go on /pol anymore.
All labels are somewhat faggoty. But the term has social usefulness if it can actually identify an actual subset of the population. How elastic the term is depends on in/consistency over time.
Est-ce que la révolution viendra de la France encore une fois?
Suit yourself
youtube.com
As far as I'm concerned there is no Alt-Lite, only Alt-wrong.
La révolution française 2.0, avec pour mission de sauver l'Occident de la destruction et de l'invasion
>google it
>go to wikipedia
>this is mentioned in the first paragraph
>It is difficult to tell how much of what people write is serious, and how much is intended to provoke outrage
like I said. the term means nothing.
A term's meaning isn't the meaning of the first one to conceive it, but the meaning meant by the huge majority. For example the word Semite designated at first not only Jews but also Arabs who are Semites. But nowadays anti-semitism only means being against the Jews.
What I mean is that terms evolve, and that nowadays alt-right has become a way bigger movement with a hardcore minority which created it at first.
I don't know what to tell you. The majority are essentially on the same page as Richard Spencer. Also, most of the notable figures in the movement have spoken out against degenerates like Milo and fence-sitters like Steven Crowder. I mean we started a whole meme last month trying to make Steven Crowder out as a massive nazi who wanted to gas all the kikes.
Language does evolve but usually for the worse and illegitimately.
For example, by your line of reasoning, the redefinition of the term racism, to strictky mean "prejudice+power" would be legitimate and your opponents could label you whatever they want and be correct.
That's not always the case, and a term like "racist" is different from a term designating a political movement. The truth is that the alt-right has no leader, and nobody can give a consensual definition to what it means.
>youtube.com
I agree with you that the alt right is leaderless.
And I question a group or individual who arbitrarily sets itself up as the authority of a leaderless entity.
But - if Richard Spencer for example was indeed the first to coin the term in order to describe a pre-existing cohort of thinkers, who happen to be unanimous about their alliance or overlap and the adequacy of the term, then they get to define it. (IMO I suppose)
I just don't know if this is the case and whether it can be proven. But it may.
Couldn't we draw a parallel with alt-left ? The alt-left being all the SJW's/Black lives matter cunts. We could say that bernie sanders supporters would be soft alt left, and hardcore SJW's would be the equivalent of the hardcore alt-right ?
The axis to draw this parallel in the end is nothing but ethnicity/race : the alt-left tends to want a multicultural country where white people are at the bottom, whereas the alt-right tends to want a white ethno-state with the white people on top ?
I say "tend" to indicate that is just a tendency, something they lean to, and the heart of each movement would be the hardcore part, which started their respective movements at first.
Just to add, the video linked to above, by "millennial woes" is asserting that he and the people he names are THE alt right. He also says that his Youtube channel is his livelihood.
This brings the ligitimacy of his claim to being "definitive" into question because his livelihood is certainly a plausible motive for trying to capture the term for his own purposes.
Whoever the fuck he is, his right to do that can only be established by his being the originator or being given the right by the originator.
Or him being widely recognized by those who identify as alt-righters as their leader ? It's a really hard question, to know what actually is a movement. But I guess every movement has different trends and shades inside it, what must be found is the common roots that unites the whole thing.
So I guess the alt-right can be defined as an anti-SJW, anti-immigration, anti-islam, pro freedom of expression, anti feminist movement. This is the common ground of every alt-righter.
Hey frog can you find the video by a corsican youtuber named arnaud sessarou (not sure on spelling) where he reacts to the beach fight ( Muslims attacked corsican women for wearing bikinis, corsican men beat up the Muslims and even punched them when they were on a stretcher) arnaud's reaction was very inspiring for us Americans but he deleted it. English subtitles please
Is there an "alt-left" per se? Perhaps on substance or in the way you describe but is the term actually being floated and adopted? Just curious.
As for the "core" or "heart" of the alt-right being about race, I could be biased as I am by no means an alt-right-oldfag (if I would even be allowed membership as a non racist). But what the other user called "cultural libertarians" as being distinct from the alt-right does do, is draw their "identitarian" tendencies (to borrow the term from Spencer) along broader, cultural lines to mean Western Civilization rather than the White race per se. At most they are provisionally adopting a protective or racIALIST stance because they/we have been forced to, rather than by an inherent sense of superiority/inferiority. Which is where Im at.
I am way more concerned about not being oppressed or actively wiped out or damaged as a SWM, than I am about feeling superior. Way more concerned about the preservation and dignity of our civilization and cultural output/achievements than about undermining the dignity or relevance of any other.
Come for me or my wife and family, or go too far with social justice policies and practices and we have a big problem. But if someone is cool with me I'm cool with them.
I don't know where this places me along the (artificial) spectrum of cultural-libertarian-alt-right. Doesnt really matter.
If some stormfag "denounces" me they can suck my dick.
>ctr trying to divide trump supporters
I'm Alt right
Oh yeah this video was great, I would love to translate it, but i don't want to get copyright striked though, but if there is no copyright issue this will be done asap.
I understand a lot what you mean, I personally am in a kind of "middle ground", where I find the cultural libertarians too soft but hardcore alt-righters... too hardcore.
But I think the first step is find what unites us all, which is first to put an end to political corectness, SJW's etc... Then there can be a talk about what we propose after putting an end to the left stupidity.
(btw do you have a twitter account, would love to continue this conversation, it is late in France right now and I have to go soon) or you can add me @French_Rebel_
I don't know if the original is even on his channel anymore. But he will copyright it so i ask that you upload a subtitled version on mega if possible. Or if it is still on his channel YouTube might let you write your subtitles on his own video
I can easily find his video that has been reused by many, but it's not on his channel anymore. And yeah he would probably copyright strike me. Convince him to let me translate the video and be sure i'll translate it.
Bump