I don’t get it. He asked for consent and got it, yet they still crucify him.
Louis CK
Other urls found in this thread:
women get to withdraw consent after the fact now.
when he asked them, you have to understand that he was in a position of power over them [as an assistant writer on the chris rock show]
They're likely mad he's not casting them in his work now that his career has taken off and theirs hasn't.
liberals cannibalize their own, it's that simple
You have to understand that the current progressives don't realise the contradictions in what they're saying. The main point of their passion is "women weak, man bad". So even though they SAY they think women have agency they don't actually believe it enough to let the women take responsibility.
It doesn't matter if he got consent, women can't be expected to be able to give consent and it's always the man's fault if something happens because he is strong and bad while the woman is innocent and weak.
All their bullshit is easy to understand if you just get this core concept (that they will never admit to).
>and got it
No, he didn't.
Also, in a position of authority/superiority, you should avoid treading into those waters anyway. Stop trying to fuck your underlings.
It's a good thing in the long run. Now he can stop being a shitty Woody Allen wannabe and go back to being funny dirtbag Louis like he was on his O+A appearances.
Are these not adult women capable of saying yes or no? Can they not understand the consequences of their actions and choice of words?
>underlings.
except according to feminists men are always in a position of power so all sex is now rape.