Why are people "edgy" for being in the green quadrant? Does it not make the most sense of the four?

Why are people "edgy" for being in the green quadrant? Does it not make the most sense of the four?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Fv6VCX565gI
books.google.ca/books?id=BcFNAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA206&lpg=PA206&dq=nihilo libertarian democracy the god that failed&source=bl&ots=j0PjJ3DNLl&sig=xHXQ2oeauV-O2EGz89tmUjIS9mY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZrpLUzoLQAhVS6GMKHW39BAcQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=nihilo libertarian democracy the god that failed&f=false
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

this is you
youtube.com/watch?v=Fv6VCX565gI

There's no way there isn't a leaf behind that flag

It's where edgy and unrealistic retards like Trotsky and Lenin end up.

Red and Green are disgusting.
Purple is best.
Blue is necessary to reverse the damages done by red and green in order to arrive at purple.
Low-IQ nations can never transition from blue into purple.

Can you expound on why you think purple is best?

Kys

How can you be libertarian and left-wing at the same time you need autority to take away peoples stuff to ""redistribute"" it

-90/10 bait

>not being the exact center

Whoa, you crazy extremists. Why cant you be more reasonable?

Left implies redistribution which implies violating the NAP. Left and libertarian are mutually exclusive.

The power of government that comes with blue is potentially corruptible into red or green over time, as blue uses social policies to outlaw what is harmful to the culture of society. When laws are seen as the method of correcting any perceived wrongs on society, it isn't too hard to believe that a "put tariffs on x for the good of society" state appearing, and a "put these regulations on those greedy banks who hurt the state" appearing, and a "the farmers have terrible wages due to the advancement of technology, ban the technology", and even "the working class need a living wage in order to be able to survive in the state".

The strong thrive and are bred in freedom, while the weak perish.

Do you support the use of violence against me?

I'm slightly in the green and voting for Trump.

The green quarter is just the naive patsies of the red quarter.

Also political compass is the biggest pile of meme shit and is heavily biased towards the bottom and towards the left.

You get questions like "do you think that people should have food?" and if you answer yes it puts you left economically because obviously only the government can make food

The strong are the people willing to kill you to eat. Not those mr 1% man with their fancy cars who managed to do well in civilized society with all its protections (which are inherently socialist in nature)

If you're a fuckin beach bum it does

im exactly where ghandi is
that makes me superior to you

Why are you conflating strength of muscle with strength of ability to control the resources of a given society?
People who kill you to eat are pests and will most definitely be exterminated by a society that values living more than it values feeding the starving.
On the contrary, only in a socialist society can people support the killing of an innocent so that another can feed.

Only the black line is stable.

All else moves to meet it.

thoughts?

Gorillas are a lot stronger than us, but who would you consider the superior species?

...

You sound fancy. I bet you taste fancy.

Colour blind or?

Its not edgy its just they routinely get their asses handed to them in realpolitik

I'm down there too.

cunt

>Only the black line is stable.
Article of faith. Not a fact.

Cut myself twice responding to this post

What I'm getting from this thread is that the chart is too reductive and unreliable to accurately map everyone's political leanings, and it only turns people against each other for being on opposite sides.

Like said, meme shit.

It's lefty propaganda made by some academic faglord green lefty
It puts Obama in top right blue and centres the user in middle green.

...

true, but I can reason that the only stable government is one whose influence is proportional to its size

Your post actually proves my point.

You are pointing out that gorillas have higher physical strength than humans. That is to say, gorillas are better than humans at something. The british lolbertarian points out that some people have a specific skill at a certain ability, in this case 'controlling resources'. Ignoring for now that many people often attribute luck or circumstance to skill, we will go with it for now, lets say one of them does.

Both of these strengths, the gorillas strength and the mans strength, are optimal for certain specific tasks.

Both of those tasks, however, are meaningless if a clever individual really good at conducting violence decides it wants to kill that gorilla, or that man.

It is ridiculous to claim you are strong because you can do some arbitrary thing that is successful in the system of government you are shilling for, when desperate people can always take it from you. If you want to call strength a virtue then there it is. If you want to not have things taken from you you must insure everyone has what they need to be comfortable enough not to decide its time eat you, and for that you need socialism.

if we're talking runescape gods then red is the best followed by purple then green then blue

Surprisingly accurate, senpai

>tfw Amerifags have no idea how extreme-right their ideas are compared to other countries.

Even our most right-wing parties are less right-wing than your democrats.

Bernie Sanders would be centre-right here.

Socialism facilitates the removal of resources from the most productive and Libertarianism prevents it.
Libertarianism is better for the current poor than socialism regardless.

Do you not know what Libertarian Left is? It's the Communist economic model but open borders and no laws.

Fuck you. Armadyl/Guthix for life.

>self-proclaimed democratic socialist
>centre-right
yeah okay

HA! Yeah if you want your civilization destroyed within a century.

zamorak>zaros>seren>armadyl>guthix>saradomin>memedos

Here's the real redpill, you need a balance of all 4 to have a decent government and society that will create a comfy prosperous country. Extremists in power always herald an economic downturn and major global restructuring, see the radical left being called moderate and the actual moderates being called far-right in the Western press.

And Itchlarin? And others of the Desert Pantheon? What about Brassica Prima?

In Portugal, the Social Democrat party (PSD) is indeed considered centre-right.

What would be great is if we could have a place to debate politics 100% anonymously through a more conducive format than text and pictures. Once you "pick a side" your opinion is worth nothing to certain groups. Charts like the one I posted at the start only make the "battle lines" clearer and shuts up debate. Fucking sucks, man.

Nazi's called themselves national socialists, they were not socialist at all. What someone calls himself is not necessarily true.

Socialism is public roads, police forces, fire departments, standing army, healthcare.

With out those things there is simply chaos. Socialism is everywhere and inherent to some degree in every single system.

Are you color blind?

Nap and libertarian are mutually exclusive. Nature abhors your trying to impose your peculiar arbitrary ideal on her

Yep he is. He doesnt realise they were authoritation, not libertarian.

Tax authority is only a certain amount of authority. The green quadrant isn't as tolerant of power hungry asshats as the red quadrant.

It just mean that europeans politic is absolute shit even if there was no corruption

>only a socialist society will support killings to facilitate another person eating
wat

not edgy, just retarded.

That's not true. Many green squarers don't support anarchy and open borders.

Well, we seem to do better than you, so I dare to disagree on that. Your politics could use some more true left-wing.

They subsumed social benefit to the individual into benefit to the state.

No no no, green is your dumb fun loving pothead idiots, red is for edgelords.

GQBQ

meme gods
cabbage is Sup Forums
itchlarin is okay

>/k/ is green square
heh

DUDE WEED LMAO

Can we have a single political compass thread without having retards like you introducing >muh weed

whatever else you want to call the forced redistribution of property

...

It's not automatically socialist. Most states at some point have or had taxes, but only a fraction of them would be considered socialist by the dictionary definition.

Le epic XDD

...

I meant specifically policies which redistribute wealth from the rich solely for the claimed purpose of giving consumption directly to the poor and exclusively the poor.

Don't infer anything from this question, this is a straight shot question, I know text on Sup Forums can sound sarcastic in your head, but have you ever read Marx, Kropotkin, Proudhon, or Žižek?

It isn't about the redistribution of private (as opposed to personal) property, it's the abolition of such so that the means of production are owned by everyone and no one. i.e. No individuals claiming stake and then exploiting workers to extract surplus value. This isn't a Robin Hood thing, where the rich are evil and the poor are good. It's about "fuck that system, let's make it just for everyone so no one has authority over the other"

To put a reductive spin on it: Star Trek. What we want is basically Star Trek for real.

I've got Das Kapital on my bookshelf but I keep getting preoccupied with other reads.

Fair enough, Capital is a fucking thick and dense few books.

this, Green is Marxist cancer of open borders, (((diversity))), and whatever else garbage you can think of. Child sex, any kind of drugs, whatever the fuck, that's the relativist square.
Red uses force to ensure you will stay docile to the government. Just new oligarchs, same shit brand of Communism. Doesn't work, never will. It's proof that voluntary societies will fail, and that you need force to keep the future you want in-line.
Purple is respectable because of their economic models, but shit because they have no social structure, society has the capability to become just as degenerate.
See: books.google.ca/books?id=BcFNAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA206&lpg=PA206&dq=nihilo libertarian democracy the god that failed&source=bl&ots=j0PjJ3DNLl&sig=xHXQ2oeauV-O2EGz89tmUjIS9mY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZrpLUzoLQAhVS6GMKHW39BAcQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=nihilo libertarian democracy the god that failed&f=false
Blue has the social structure that ensures the family unit, ethno-centrism, nationalist sentiments that ostracize kike subversion for globalism, miscegenation, etc., and the free market (for the one true goal of uplifting the people instead of the international bankers).

What is this? Im in the red. I want to be center top like mein Furher. Where did I go wrong?

Please tell me your argument is more than "Keep the different people away from me so that we can have our Upstanding Society™ over here in peace!" because that's a silly stance that always rips when stretched a little.

Purple? Wtf red is better than purple. blue is best

Green destroys the society that makes itself possible. It's a self-destructive cancer.

This is exactly right. Blue reverses the damage done by red and green but purple is the best, once blue has done its job.

Nah, it's not a strawman like you make up, it's more complicated than just that.
It's more like keep the Sodomites or any other sexual deviation away from healthy citizens so that they cannot subvert their degenerate lifestyle into normalcy, or keep the Jews who control media and push for hasbara or miscegenation outside so as to maintain the original ethnic group. Read the link, that's the argument right there.
You think that isn't peaceful? Okay, have fun living in some diversity hellhole, I'll be over here living in my oppressive-to-POC-and-Queer community.

t. retarded bootlicker

The green quadrant involves more logical contradictions than anyone can care to defend.

Red = Low IQ degenerate
Green = High IQ degenerate
Blue = Low IQ achiever
Purple = High IQ achiever

Prove me wrong.

purple has no means of controlling the society
resulting in development of red and green

I grew up in a religious community that is currently eating itself alive because "what happens when our kids are gay!?" and "those girls got raped because their shoulders were visible" so I can tell you from experience that your peaceful little community is going to last only as long as no one in it has any gay or transgender kids, as long as rape is allowed and never talked about, and a whole slew of other psychologically traumatic shit is allowed. No one is asking you to tolerate difference (maybe some whiny liberals, but you can disregard that shit show). You're just going to get a rude awakening, purely naturally and from within your own community, if you think that lifestyle is at all sustainable.

stoooore fronts

>Green = High IQ degenerate
Can confirm correct

See my flag, we are under à socialist shithole

>it's another: every woman was beaten by her husband who also fucked underage girls but nobody talked about it because it was the '50's post
The kids are gay because of relativist cancer being shilled in the media. Why not look at who's doing the raping, and who is accepting it as "diversity"? Weak discipline from parents because they don't care enough.
Also
>I can tell you from experience
mmhmm.

purple quadrant is the ideal in a homogeneous society

blue quadrant is what we need right now

The green quadrant is inherently self contradictory. You cannot be left wing and be for maximum liberty because socialism requires robbing people through taxation.

>Does it not make the most sense of the four?

Good lord no, it's a contradiction in terms. You can't be libertarian and support a state run economy, they're diametrically opposed terms

Oh geez I hope you didn't glean from what I said that I support rape. No, fundamentalist conservatives are blaming victims of rape.
>kids are gay because of relativist cancer being shilled in the media
I assume you aren't homosexual because this is kool-aid chugging on another level. Gay people aren't gay because they saw that being gay was cool on TV. Gay people are gay because they looked at someone of the same sex and said "I'd hit that"

Allow me to extrapolate on what the leaf said.

I'm of the opinion that most gays are not born that way. Some may be, but many are a result of societal or family factors. There's probably always been a few gays here and there (up to 5% if the LGBTXR2 is to believed) but most fell in line and did their duty as a man (or woman) to reproduce and support a family.

Thanks to leftist shilling in the media, may, if not most of the formerly closeted fags are now proud homos, and as a result their influence on the media is turning more kids gay than normally would be. If your kid grows up seeing a group of friends on TV that includes a nigger, a paki, a spic and a fag couple, they'll think all of these things are normal and as a result grow up to be another cog in the leftist shilling machine

This is the umpteenth time I've seen people equate socialism with statism and nationalism... far from it. Sorry the only examples of communism in your textbooks (USSR, China, et al) have been state capitalist dictatorships that oppress and exploit just as much as capitalism without the added benefit of ridiculous levels of surplus and frivolous commodities.

street siiiigns

>No, fundamentalist conservatives are blaming victims of rape.
Niggers rape, rape babies should be aborted, I'm not Evangelical, sorry. Close borders and stop hyper-sexualizing everything in the media.

>I assume you aren't homosexual because this is kool-aid chugging on another level. Gay people aren't gay because they saw that being gay was cool on TV. Gay people are gay because they looked at someone of the same sex and said "I'd hit that"
Homosexuality is against the biological imperative of humans, that which reigns supreme even in old age: geezers still wanna fuck because it is inherent in all animals. I had a great image making the argument that, based on the definition of a mental illness as the incapability of withdrawing from non-necessary behaviours, homosexuality is a disease in that it does not achieve anything and is against the biological imperative. There are no children that are homosexual, only bad parenting and relativist lessons that obfuscate reality. I'm paraphrasing the argument, it also included statistics on STD's and hook-ups for faggots, and the interesting point on this one parasite most humans have.

oh, so you're a shill. take this last (You).
By the way, on the off-chance you smarten up, voluntary societies are destructive, you cannot claim to follow Marx and redistribute all goods and work as a commune without a government and expect everybody to work harmoniously, if I decide to leave and make my own business, you will need to use force to keep me in line, or to redistribute my goods. Which is why every time Communism is attempted, it depends on the state for redistribution. State capitalism is an oxymoron, how can it be the free market if privatized companies are punished and sent to gulags?

Socialism is impossible without statism

How are you going to force me to pay taxes to support the welfare if there's no state to do it? Face it, socialism IS statism

So green is the only one that doesn't hate?

Hate is what society is built upon

Hate for the cold, hate for starvation, hate for those that keep you cold and starving. If you team up with ug and ooga, then you can smash the cunts that keep stealing your mammoth tusks

>how the first society came to be

Green is the most naive quadrant.
>let's give everyone freedom over their lives while also never having any true consequences for their actions
Literally only works in a post-scarcity society. The only reason Europe and to an extent America gets away with it is because their economies are top-tier and they can borrow. It just can't hold up over a long period of time.

socialists don't care about consistency, logic and the results of their actions
had they cared, they wouldn't be socialists