Is there anything you agree with liberals on?

Is there anything you agree with liberals on?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=gaE-WLe8DU8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Liberals is a pretty vague term. I agree with the ones that want to legalize weed though.

kush

Let's say your average modern day millenial liberal.

I dont like guns.

I like nature, and think we should conserve it

This

the drug war is retarded
i am a huge fan of public lands and think they are important to our national character. if you don't spend alot of time innawoods you are a huge fag who will die when the habbenings go down

Good call.

I agree that cheap (or free) education is the surest way to retain our superpower status in the long term.

They support planned parenthood that was started by a believer in Eugenics and they purposely target black communities to increase the abortion rate in these neighborhoods, so less niggers all around.

Abortion:
youtube.com/watch?v=gaE-WLe8DU8

With real liberals? And not neoliberals? Sure.

1. Freedom of speech.
2. Due process.
3. Not starting stupid fucking wars for the MIL-IND complex so that we can also displace refugees and radically change our demographic makeup on behalf of the Zionist masters.
4. On-demand abortion for poor minorities.

I agree with this to the extent that I think our national parks are very important, but I disagree with their godawful environmental regulations.

I also think keeping the arts in schools is important to raise well-rounded children.

Public funding on many forms of government assistance. Although most liberals blow it out of proportion and use welfare as a way of buying votes.

Homosexual marriage should be legal

yea EPA and especially this regulatory framework called NIPA is a huge burden on society.

I do wildland fire and trail work and you have to go through a LOT of regulations before you even move a grain of sand sometimes. It's ridiculous.

>2 & 4
Isolationism and eugenics are not necessarily liberal ideas.

I think they agree with me on legalize all drugs and prostitution. But that would clash with free health care...

Money out of politics

Protecting the environment. Legalizing gay marriage. Expanding opportunities for women in male-dominated careers. Cheap education and healthcare even if it comes from my taxes (since I would directly be benefiting).

Maybe on legalizing weed, but that is about it.

People should be entitled to the fruits of their labor

but what exactly that means differs from me to them

Abortion and weed

Weed, guns and abortion

killing black babies

I think killing animals for sport is cruel.

That's my only libcuck belief that I can think of.

Legitimate liberals are typically very pro choice and against bombing the shit out of brown people for the profit of a select few people.

this plus workers' rights

I agree on abortion being available because of all the niggers it kills. In fact, I'd be okay with my taxes paying for handing out birth control and abortions in inner city communities, for the same reasons.

>free

Euthanasia. I think euthanasia should be available for everyone, not just the terminally ill.

I believe the environment is important and needs to be preserved. I also feel that urban/suburban sprawl is bad and should be discouraged.

I do not, however, believe everything the generic "pro-environment" side says automatically, and I know (having taken multiple university courses on the scientific/engineering side of environmental topics as well as studying it independently) that much of the 'efforts' are a participation trophy at best.

We could, for instance, skyrocket our emissions control laws to ridiculous levels but if we don't do something about nations like China then it's for nothing in the long run. There are very few truly renewable fuels; nuclear is non-renewable and even solar requires panels which have a lifespan and are composed of metals which are hardly environmentally friendly to obtain.

The biggest, is that once we destroy our vast wilderness, it's gone. Yosemite is about as 'wild' as a community park. Crater Lake, once the most pristine body of water in the world, has a five-story hotel on its ridge and daily boat tours dripping oil into a body of water with no outlet. You can drive down the highway all across Texas and never see open, public land.

Yes but those aren't ideological besides it's a sympathetic reaction.

I'm a big fan of killing babies and exploiting minorities for personal profit.

Poetry and writing are an incredibly important part of developing a national identity and children need to be exposed to their country's literary history as soon as possible.

People who want to take it out for more math and other stem subjects are raising a generation of robots who will betray their country for money.

Also merit is more important than race, but that's pretty central and I think a lot of conservatives share that line of thought.

ideological basis's
Or however you say plural basis idgaf

I want suicide booths to be a thing

that they're our problems

Domestic spying

State propaganda

I believe abortion should be legal. I believe evolution is a real thing. Global warming is also real. That's about it.

Kill yourself. "Legalizing" gay marriage? There was no ban on ceremonies. The issue was whether they were compelled to be recognized for the purposes of employer benefits and government largesse. While I disagree with government subsidies to marriage, there is at least a legitimate basis for doing so in heterosexual relationships - the environment for child-rearing that is naturally impossible for gays (any benefits you might want to provide in such circumstances would properly attach to the child, not the parents).

Yes, but not for the same reasons.

Pretty much everything except open borders.

Most of the hyper-liberal european countries seemed like paradises until they started letting anyone and everyone in and treating them the same or better than citizens.

I want to plunge society into a tyrannical hellhole with me at the top weilding absolute power.

God I love being a liberal.

I agree to eat her out

Smash Capitalism is something I agree with libtards on.

Racial segregation.

I don't think anyone disagrees with the value of the arts, the problem is that the arts have been, for decades now, simply a tool for radical leftist indoctrination.

I mean, I agree with almost all of what Locke wrote, but modern liberals still call me right wing.

Then don't get one. Free country.

ending the drug war, no matter how much people cry degeneracy, the government really has no right to tell people they can't get high.

Not to mention knowing the only reason it's illegal at all is so a group of cocksucking globalist bankers can have control over a black market and use it as a source of income to fund black budget projects that the public doesn't know about.

Free markets are always better than black markets.

>t.12 year old

>Atheism
At least the liberal party used to be the atheist party but now it seems more secular and all inclusive which, by it's nature, stands in the way of liberal ideals.
>Regressive left.

Abortion for the retarded

Scandinavian countries got where they did through relatively free markets and limited government intervention. Then they got soft and complacent, favoring stability and stagnation over risks and payoffs.

This. I'm actually very conservative, but grew in the south hunting and fishing, so I do think the enviroment needs to be protected, but the most efficient way to do so i'm not sure.

Not all liberal policies are inherently bad, but it's about context and intent. For example, I'm fine with universal healthcare, free higher education and some form of welfare. However, the requirement is that it's given to ethnic Norwegians, or other white people who have become thoroughly integrated into Norwegian society.
I'm not for providing these things to non-western immigrants, or even having non-western immigration at all. It's about trust and a sense of community. You take care of your own.

That being said, this obviously isn't a solution for every country. In the US, for example, it simply wouldn't work. The country was founded on a very specific interpretation of freedom, and it's become too culturally ingrained in society to change it without change the core of what the US really is. The country is also far more fragmented than smaller European countries, not just in a geographical sense, but also culturally and ethnically. White Americans paying for the welfare, healthcare and education of niggers and spics, would almost be the same as white Americans paying for Mexico's welfare/healthcare/education. They're just two different population, living in two different socities, even if they all live within the same borders.

- there should be a social safety net
- there should be civil liberties
- there should be an end to stupid, foreign wars
- Israel is an apartheid state
- the environment is sacred and should be protected

jill stein makes me sweat

This.
As this guy says, though, the way lefties do things is usually retarded to the extreme. A massive shift to renewable power is necessary, but:
a.) A carbon tax is Jew-tier speculative bullshit
b.) Subsidies shouldn't be tossed around like candy to 'green' companies--that just encourages waste.
Most of the problem here is with multinational corporations that act like turbo-Jews, stopping at nothing to get wealth. I would like to see blatant environmental exploitation be punished severely, but the current over-regulation just means that only mega-corporations can get away with anything. Small businesses can't do jack shit with all sorts of mandated 'environmental damage reports.'


Also this. Eat what you kill, and don't hunt a species to extinction.

oh, and college and healthcare should be mostly socialized

Yup

the only thing the government should do is fund research for green energy, cover the R&D costs for a nascent industry, that should be all that is necessary

I also think most conservatives and right wing people are stupid and simple minded.

I'm liberal on lots of things. Like my use of the word 'Cuck'.

Everything

No.

white privilege-
When one group, who is a majority, ends up favoring their own people, that literally becomes the REASON why multiculturalism doesn't work.

Subjective morality-
While I think it's retarded we excuse immigrants for raping a child because "they're not used to the culture", morality will always be relativistic. There's no objective morality, simply because morality is a form of communication; and like language, morality always serves as communication for one group of people. Legalistic people, such as the religious zealots who believe in an objective "law" are what's wrong with the world.

Transgenderism-
Nothing wrong with transgendered people. I don't necessarily think they have a "mental problem". People only see it as a "mental problem", because they believe that the Transgendered person's brain wants to alter our perception of that person, leading us to believe that the brain is at fault. Their ineptitude towards society isn't in the fact that they have a brain problem, because their mind is what creates our perception of who they are; rather, it's their ineptitude is due to the fact that they have a body problem, the wrong chromosomes, the wrong hormones, the wrong genitalia . This is a very subjective opinion though.

Vaccines

I agree with leftists that niggers should keep aborting their little negroids.

>Eat what you kill
what does it matter if you eat it or the worms and coyotes eat it? Something is going to eat it. I never understood this logic.

Conserving the environment and caring for animal rights isn't inherently a left-wing ideology. Even Hitler was an obsessive animal rights activist.

Savitri Devi supported this too.
Look her up. Not a liberal by any means.

Yeah, she's pretty.

I agree that Jill Stein is Gilf 10/10 would bang.

I don't know. They flip flop constantly

I dont really care wither way but there is a difference between feeding humans and feeding maggots.... i mean real maggots, not the liberal type

I admire Jill Stein's passion and honesty.

True, but most right wingers either simply don't care about the environment or prioritise corporate profits ahead of the environment for some reason.

weed and abortions

As an anarcho-capitalist, here are my "liberal" positions.
>legalize all drugs
>bring the troops home
>no sodomy laws
>no abortion regulations (but I am still against abortion)
>two state solution for Israel/Palestine
>abolish the NSA and repeal the PATRIOT ACT and the USA FREEDOM Act
>against Stop & Frisk (because it doesn't work. What actually worked in NYC was broken window policing, which I support and libs hate)
>believe in evolution

>>no abortion regulations (but I am still against abortion)
>let's kill 9 month old babies

>thinks evolution is a liberal position

kys

preventing pollution and encouraging wildlife reserves or protected areas is a far cry from stopping (((global warming))) though.

Anarcho-capitalist is a well known contradiction in terms. Getting a bit tired of you neckbeards flagrantly appropriating our (actual anarchist) terminology. You're not an anarchist, you're a corporate apologist and don't share anarchist ideals. Don't you have a cartoon pony video to watch while you masturbate and cry about being a manlet who can't get laid?

No one should go into debt for the rest of their life because they can't afford to pay hospital bills for an accident.

I, however, do not think that the way to rectify this is by demanding that everyone pay some corporation for medical insurance every month, and by fining them if they "fail" to do so.

efforts to provide education and safety nets to the poor with the aim of alleviating poverty

efforts to minimize the impact of global warming

not being a pussy when dealing with Russia

ending the war on drugs

prison reform

gay marriage

shilling for Hillary

Basically everything except gun control and the radical social justice movements that have come to be called SJWs.

You realise anthropogenic climate change is scientifically very well supported don't you? What's wrong with you burgers?

>anarcho-capitalist
grow up kid

I am against abortion regulations because they don't work. A better solution would be for the friends and family of a woman that has an abortion to ostracize and disown her and for property owners (her landlord for example) to throw her out on to the street and let her live the same life her aborted fetus did.

I am someone with a jarring conflict of polarised social beliefs:

A. - I believe that the created society; jobs, cultures, manners, clothes, suits, laws, religion, marriage, monogamy, conduct - everything that goes with contemporary society is absolutely absurd. Humans are, of course, only animals. We (aggregate humans) have created a permanent role-play of which we must all conform to. Our natural life should consist of three things; consuming, living, and fucking. I say this half-in-jest, but animals are naturally driven by intuition (call it biological disposition, if you wish). With this kind of mind-set, though, a hedonistic life quickly aligns itself as the true answer. However, it could be argued that a nihilistic and self-destructive mindset is also at a stark contrast to the natural animal urges supposedly driving us all. And of course, given the rules of the society, we must conform or end up in a metal cage. If you think about it, the so-called "rape" is the natural form of sexual relationships. So what are the options?

B. - My natural disposition draws me to a socially conservative and traditional outlook. I often reason to myself that I live like a Mormon, though I am not religious. I eschew alcohol, cigarettes, coffee. My porn-watching ways are again at a conflict with the doctrine, though. I would be quite happy if I could find a good wife, have children, and never have another partner outside of that relationship. I have always admired Mitt Romney's life and relationship with his family. The reality is, though, divorce is imminent in almost every modern marriage. Could I even find a girl that I would respect enough to marry?
Most people seem to just do, just live. I feel bound by this conflict and not sure of the next step. At the moment I consider myself just an observer to the world - everyone else lives on, but I am different.

the WP writers have their own views while the board just wants shillary elected at all costs

The French revolution was pretty good.

All else into the gulag.

That there have been racial and gender inequalities built into our society that should be overcome.

I disagree with how: There should be equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome.


I also believe that the Constitution is a "living document" and I am not an originalist.

The Founding Fathers thought the same way too.

Which is why they put provisions into the constitution allowing it to be changed completely if desired.

I disagree with liberals about using the SCOTUS to overrule the plain language of the constitution.

You're fuckin' mental m8

I do agree with cheap or free education funded by taxes.

don't tie the opportunity to how much money you have or to your race (scholarships) but to how intelligent and hard-working the students are.

merit and merit alone should determine how far you go in life

and what about the dead 9 month old baby?

le chateau autiste

I can't even fully express with words the battle for direction that goes on in my mind. I understand why I sound fukin' nuts though. You are one of the people that "just live, just do".

REKT SON
360 NOBABY