HAPPENING! There's now a warrant out for new emails

what will they find Sup Forums?

either way it's over. She's finished

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/AP_Politics/status/792866474507505664
12bytes.org/articles/history/test-your-holocaust-knowledge
youtube.com/watch?v=KEVoYimdY4M
youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY
youtube.com/watch?v=0P47yvI7SWM
youtu.be/vo_j1L4qXCs
youtube.com/watch?v=on9TXY8kYyk
scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=bjcl
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

NOOOOOOOOOO

Pedophile ring involving half the US government including Bill and Hillary Clinton

that sucks

Clintons discussing the tightness off 8 year old Somalians with Bidden and Weiner, including pictures

...

...

repeating digits don't lie

Kek blesses the thread

We could've used him

> it's real
twitter.com/AP_Politics/status/792866474507505664

to obtain a warrant, don't they have to convince a judge that there is actually a reason to?

IT'S REAL:

twitter.com/AP_Politics/status/792866474507505664

Lynch will use her evil to save hillary

my dubs do not lie

COUGHING FIT

PANTS OF SHIT

CAN’T STAND UP

SHE HAS TO SIT

EVERY TIME SHE TELLS A LIE

SHIT RUNS DOWN HER INNER THIGH

PEE PEE PEE POO POO POO

SHE WON'T MAKE IT TO THE LOO

BY PEPE, KEK, AND DONALD TRUMP

LIVE ON TRIAL SHE'LL TAKE A DUMP

the judge must be a Trump supporter. only explanation. ITS NOTHING

Really nigga

Fuck Hillary and fuck white people.

>shills saying they only found 3 emails
>650,000 emails found
kek

...

Thank you America for this election, and thank you Sup Forums for memeing for Trump until he became the Republican nominee.

It could be though that she isn't tied up in this situation and Clinton is inevitably going down. None of us know what they've found. If this is the case then it depends on how much love she has personally for Clinton as to whether or not she wants to step onto that sinking ship.

They have to convince a judge that there is probable cause that the information is relevant to the investigation of a crime.

There isn't a judge in the whole federal system that would whimsically give out a warrant to search for Hillary's emails.

They found something in those Weiner emails that led them to the location of more emails.

IT'S HAPPENING!!!

I doubt she's finished. Trump would have to turn traditional states blue and I doubt that will happen. Who know tho, this whole election has been a cluster fuck

>bulging weiner

Eheh

AHAHAHAHAHA

Disney they come out and say recently that it had nothing to do with Clinton or is that man/doj covering shit up

>Bulging Weiner prob
KEK

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

DELETE THIS RIGHT NOW
IT IS ILLEGAL FOR YOU TO DISCUSS THIS

You are correct. Her chance of winning is about 10% right now.

>bulging weiner probe

>Bulging weiner probe

>bulging Weiner probe

every agent on the case is either running away or working 24/7.

they fail their careers are toast, they succeed they're legends.

>Bulging weiner probe

But hwat are her chances of getting sworn in?

the people behind these lies also lied about the past

12bytes.org/articles/history/test-your-holocaust-knowledge

how much propaganda do you still believe?

the establishment want hillary to win, sorry but nothing will come of this as much as it should do

im not sure why the FBI are even pressing this matter? are they going to pretend to find lots of uninteresting stuff? it makes me suspicious indeed..

>Bulging weiner probe
For fuck's sake.

We all know it, we just need the proof. Then those facts will beat out the allegations against Trump

>bulging Weiner probe

Is this election real life?

post what song is playing right now at Clinton HQ

youtube.com/watch?v=KEVoYimdY4M

youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY

The FBI is pressing this matter because half of their agents are threatening to resign over how Comey handled the first investigation.

ive been wanting someone to make a video with all the clintons staff faces photoshop over the dead bodies!!! it would be so great!

wsj reported that thousands of the emails are either to or from HRCs private server.

>Bulging Weiner probe.

What is even real anymore

hah good idea user might do this

>bulging weiner probe
Is this real life?

...

>normal American election

>Bulging Wiener probe

>Bulging Weiner probe

Just end this, end it.

I can't take the memes anymore I'm out.

youtube.com/watch?v=0P47yvI7SWM

Lmao

Is there a source on this?

how can anyone have so many fucking emails?

Best Pepe image I've seen in a while.

Yeah. Here is the former Assistant Director of the FBI on CNN last night.

youtu.be/vo_j1L4qXCs

>fbi sick of getting shit on
>cia guys get new cars
>fbi gets shit

FBI SAYS FUCK IT WE ARE TAKING DOWN THE WHOLE FUCKING THING

THE JUDGE IS NOT ONLY A RACIST, HOMOPHOBIC, WOMAN HATING, WALL OBSESSED REDNECK TRUMP LOVER, WE HAVE UNCONFIRMED, UNRELIABLE, UNKNOWN, UNSEEN, UNHEARD, REPORTS FROM A GUY WHO KNOWS A GUY WHO ONCE MET A GUY WHO KNEW OF THE NSA THAT THIS JUDGE IS 100% RELATED TO A GUY WHO ONCE LIKED A FUNNY PUTIN MEME ON FACEBOOK

DRUMPFKINS BTFO, JUDGE IS GOING TO JAIL FOR TREASON

please do, it would be legendary... i believe it could go viral.

and the next day he put out the letter
lol
gotta be something there.

Can someone please explain to me why they need an email? The laptop was lawfully seized as a part of an investigation into Weiner being a pedo, right?

As far as I'm aware, that means they get all the files on such a device. Eg: just because Huma maybe had another account on this laptop, does not mean that the authorities need additional legal justification to search the device. The justice system does not care how your filesystem is laid out. Right?

So what's going on here?

why they need a warrant***

FUCK YOU BOTH , liberal cunts

Just to make sure that whatever they find doesn't get thrown out on some technicality.

They already know what they have, they're just covering their ass

>As far as I'm aware, that means they get all the files on such a device.

You know nothing about the law, due process or how investigations are carried out. You are aware of nothing.

Nothing will happen and Hillary will win the election.

God,KEK,Satan please send her to the gallows this time. I'm not going to send the next generation to die in Russia.

Cross your t's and dot your i's, because the worst thing thing that could happen is getting off on the technicalities

you're gonna be doing hard time shillary!

youtube.com/watch?v=on9TXY8kYyk

Let's say someone was hiding stolen items in their house. Police get a warrant to search there house, find nothing but they do find that the homeowner owns another house down the road. In order to search that other house they would need a warrant for that specific residence. It's made that way actually to protect citizens, since it keeps law enforcement from being able to look in places that aren't part of the current investogation without a warrant to specify where they are allowed to look.

Best election ever. And it will become even better in 4 years when candidates will try to emulate the Don

Holy shit. I thought it was bullshit when I first saw screenshots of stuff about the warrant. AP is picking it up now?

Shit's about to go down.

We will see just how much there is here.

You guys are kidding yourselves if you think this automatically means Clinton has lost or that she won't come out of this spinning it as a political attack against her.

We need to see the evidence. It will speak for itself, whatever comes to light.

I think you probably know nothing.

Here's a paper about the subject written by Josh Goldfoot. His linkedin states that he is the "Principal Deputy Chief (Acting), Computer Crime & Intellectual Property Section (CCIPS) at U.S. Department of Justice"

scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=bjcl


> Rather than use the subcontainer perspective, a better choice is to adopt a
> perspective, similar to one that the California Supreme 2 Court recently used,
> that views storage media as physical evidence. Under this perspective, a hard
> drive is an object, not a place. It does not contain things; it is one thing.
> Like any other physical evidence, it is examined, not "searched." So long as a
> storage medium is lawfully seized, the Fourth Amendment does not restrict
> forensic examination. Just as the Fourth Amendment does not govern the work of
> the technician analyzing seized blood stains, developing film, or testing
> suspected drugs, it also does not govern the work of the technician analyzing a
> lawfully seized hard drive.

tl;dr: no, I'm not wrong.

But that's not what happened here. Huma and Weiner were using this laptop concurrently. Your analogy does not fit whatsoever.

They found evidence relating to another case on a hard drive. This hard drive was lawfully obtained.

They don't need another warrant to further look through evidence which they already legally had the ability to look through.

>inb4 they're all accidentally deleted

fucking russia, bring it on

Daily News is fucking bantz central

and Obama... let's hope he's in there!

The FBI is revolting, This fire can't be put out :,^)

Laptop was obtained as part of the Weiner case. To investigate the contents of the emails in the Clinton case they need judicial approval, hence the warrant. It's really to cover their asses, I don't think they can claim Inevitable Discovery in this case.

Say the police raid a house on drug charges, and see a blue Vera Wang purse with red trim on the counter. The purse matches a description from a murder the night before. If the purse was open they could peer inside. But it's closed. They can squeeze the purse and feel the outline of a gun in the purse. But they need a warrant to open it and check.

Nope. That's not how it works! Read the paper I linked, or even just the excerpt I included.

Hard drives are not containers for other objects. In the eyes of the law, hard drives are themselves an atomic object. They are not something that contains other things. You do not need to pursue another warrant to search a particular directory that exists within a filesystem, or files that exist under a different username, or whatever. The law does not recognize digital boundaries as a part of a hard drive.

And why should they? Anyone who knows anything about filesystems knows that the folder hierarchy on your hard drive does not accurately reflect the actual layout of the bits on the physical device. It would be impossible to analyze a hard drive without viewing the whole contents of the drive.

> Say the police raid a house on drug charges, and see a blue Vera Wang purse with red trim on the counter. The purse matches a description from a murder the night before. If the purse was open they could peer inside. But it's closed. They can squeeze the purse and feel the outline of a gun in the purse. But they need a warrant to open it and check.

This is so ridiculously wrong that I don't know why I'm even replying.

WHEN IT COMES CRASHING DOWN AND IT HURTS INSIDE

Its funny because it could pass as occupy democrat logic

Well the FBI is full of yanks. Yanks are always revolting.

That is what I call HARD news

This Comey guy may just be a fucking idiot. So far it looks like he's messing with the most important election for no good reason. So far.

what the fuck is this shit?

...

(((CNN))) and all these other shitty media are so biased it's not even funny
They're still pushing bullshit like the blue texas and arizona meme while completely ignoring the emails

Its in our blood aussie

You have to go back.

When will they publish the emails ?

Desperation.

I've never seen such a cheerleading campaign for a US presidential candidate, including foreign news like the ones from my country in all of my 40 years.

Never. FBI is not wikileaks.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHH
NOOOOOOOOOOOO

Didn't they said they will check the emails, black out the classified and personal texts and then publish ?

November 9th ;)

And yet the metadata/headers of these emails were reportedly examined and determined to be relevant to the investigation without reading the whole emails. Then they applied for the warrant. Sounds about right.

But thanks for the paper link, saved for later read.

>This is so ridiculously wrong that I don't know why I'm even replying

I don't either, it must make you feel pretty important to bother