>LOOK GUYS, I'M A DIRECTOR
LOOK GUYS, I'M A DIRECTOR
Other urls found in this thread:
Or Cinematographer?
Kinematography thread
.....
>director
>when retards make threads on Sup Forums
I feel embarrassed for you
No you're not, you're a nobody on Sup Forums.
>he doesn't understand greentext
new here? don't worry kid, you'll get it eventually
Nice job, OP. Beautiful shots!
all of this forced directing is pretty cringeworthy
...
Why are all of these shots just wide shots with high contrast color palettes? Is this what normies think looks good?
I know this is just a shitpost but on a serious note why does
>wide shot
>human silhouette in the center
garner the praise and attention of kino spouting brainlets every single time?
"kino"
The perfect confluence of stereotypical nerdy plebshit, it's the average Sup Forums poster, relatively new to the site, who goes to all the big boards on the site and shits them all up equally with his narrow knowledge and experience with various artistic mediums. He knows mainstream video games, he knows mainstream movies, he knows mainstream cartoons (especially those from the 90s and early 00s), and he knows only the biggest comic book characters. And he feels marginalized by society because of how much of a shut in he is, so he'll have the most shallow Sup Forums opinions and tastes. He'll prattle on endlessly about cucks and interracial porn, but he isn't informed or even cares about international political issues and happenings. It's just a slight veneer of memeracism and mememisogyny and the rejection of anything that could be considered "degenerate."
haha epic point fellow redditor! have my upvote, good sir :^)
It'd make more sense if it was a director that hadn't proven himself already.
man, I can't wait for another thread full of stale and dare I say dishonest pasta
>mememisogyny
>hadn't proven himself already
he hasnt
incorrect
>Not understanding humour
...
>incorrect
how
>falling for the counterbait
literally nobody likes your fucking videos uridon you failed tripfag
get lost and stay lost
I could go on for days about how Villeneuve constructs every shot, cut and line of dialogue as if they were not-so-subtle nudges to make the intellectually stunted feel like they're in on some intricate evolution in the art of plot; how Deakins' cinematography has just enough stylized gimmickry to pass off as something above-average to the ordinary moviegoer, from which such people can pat themselves on the back for having sat through their idea of cinema; how each "instropective" moment with the camera superfluously lingering on Gosling's dopey, emotionless face as he stares at nothing feels oh so very contrived, deliberate and unnatural; and how the movie is completely devoid of artistic merit and is merely a product that builds off of the legacy of a timeless classic.
But I won't.
it's not even hard to discern try hard from good visuals, but the redditplebs can't do it.
>LOOK GUYS IM SHITPOSTING
>LOOK GUYS, I HATE IT WHEN PICTURES ARE PRETTY
Good job!
>says OP, never fulfilling his dream of making a movie
You sorry excuse of a human being, go talk shit to Scott's face.
can games be kino?
>having good cinematography and actually doing your job by making the film exciting/interesting/meaningful to look at is now pretentious
kys