LEGO Movie 2

io9.gizmodo.com/the-lego-movie-sequel-will-focus-on-gender-issues-and-1809925710

Thoughts, my fellow Sup Forumscksuckers?

Dropped

If it just ends up being an allegory for Will Ferrell's kid letting his sister play with his Lego's, than maybe it could work.

But don't have WildStyle spouting feminist crap like her chinese ripoff counterpart in the emoji movie.

Everything
Is
Awful~

>Phil Lord and Chris Miller not directing

There goes the perfect comedic timing.

>The Lego Movie series will explore gender similarities and differences in regards to toys, following the plot set up at the end of the first film. The Lego Movie ended with real-world protagonist Finn being told by his dad that he has to share his playtime with his younger sister, resulting in an army of Duplo (preschool Lego toys) invading the world.

why do they always have to add a statement in the title?
>and that sounds great
>and that's a good thing
>and it's for the better

>Lord and Miller are out

That's all I needed to drop it.

What the fuck does Lego have to do with gender

how about any of that retarded shit they address the REAL problem with Legos:
The fuckin price

Because they're self righteous assholes who shouldn't be journalist in the first place?

>resulting in an army of Duplo (preschool Lego toys) invading the world.
That sounds more imperialism or immigration related. Depending on how they're using army and invading.

>The Lego Movie Sequel will focus on gender issues, and that sounds fucking awful
ftfy

But seriously, it's too early to say anything. These people love to exaggerate whatever they can to make a point about how it's about "issues". I'm more concerned about the director change and a franchise getting too successful for its own good than some clickbait bullshit trying to make it sound like something it might not be. I'll wait to see the trailers, and whether Ninjago manages to keep up with the quality that the Lego movies have provided so far.

It's a form of clickbait headline

See, to me that doesn't even seem all that politically driven. It's a movie about the world's biggest toy brand, it makes some form of sense to look at "different toy aisles" as a theme, if you get what I'm saying. Don't get me wrong, I'm as sick of having feminist shit forced into everything too. But this doesn't scream shoehorned to me.

Sounds terrible and unnecessary.

Toy Story 2 already did it.

If the next movie plot is going to be that, then it sounds more like an concept about young and old clash idea, with the clash between the shitty made builds versus the well-made builds, with the ending being working and playing together regardless of their skill.
I don't think this is going to be really about gender issues, if it was then it would've been something more obvious, something like why a princess can't be an policewoman or some shit.

Fuck the journalists for making this whole shit exaggerated to the point where it's now fake news.

>Thoughts, my fellow Sup Forumscksuckers?
I didn't even watch the first.
I'm 30 and married, not some autistic manchild on a nostalgia pop feel.

The first one is a good film

>the-lego-movie-sequel-will-focus-on-gender-issues
why

So you're here to do what, correct your child's spelling? Go spend more time with them and stop being the recluse NEET you were in your 20s

>he said, while posting on Sup Forums

io9 is one of the worse Gawker sites for pandering. Jezebel being the biggie, with The Root not far behind.

These.

But I get the feeling it's nowhere near as "gender issues" as the dopes at nuGawker want it to be.

>More of this utter crap

Can I please just enjoy good entertainment without being preached to?

>putting even more political bullshit in fucking entertainment
GOD FUCKING DAMNIT
Why the fuck do these retarded people keep putting that shit in? Why the fuck do these people want to pander to fucking SJWs? They don't even watch or read anything, and even Marvel admitted that trying to pander to SJWs actually didn't work at all because SJWs don't read any comics.

People, are only there to have fucking entertainment and fun, not to be educated with shitty political """stories""". Shit never works. Just, why won't the companies get that shit?

>Sup Forums is scared of little girls
this is so funny
i enjoy your tears

I'm gonna guess they mean a girls can play with legos too angle.
I hope they mean a girls can play with legos too angle.

No Lord and Miller? Well shit, now I really don't care

I DON'T LIKE THEM PUTTING AGENDA'S IN THE CARTOONS THAT TURN THE FRICKEN CHILDREN GAY

If it's dooplo isn't it more about age than gender?
Then again if they were to use their real girl focused lego stuff there would be incressed pressure on lego over how fucking dumb redesigned minifigures for girls are.

well we already know its going to be shit, thats going to save some time

>SCANNING THE LEGO MOVIE
>SHIPPING EVERYTHING TO CHINA
>INSERT GENDER ISSUES
>LOOK AT THIS PERSON

How did it get so bad?
Lego used to be affordable?

psychological war
they want to push this shit into your face so long and so much that you end up accepting it because accepting it and getting mad at people who make a big deal out of this is easier than getting them to stop and your brain is always looking for the easier and less taxing route

In my expirence trying to take a positive song and make it negative doesn't work.
I am basing that off a sample size of one though.

Can't get anywhere close to being good as the original - here's some social shit for some buzzfeed turds to shill.

Like Star Wars

why are you here?

to laugh at (you)

You make a good point.

All the leftie sites wrote articles about how South Park season 20 gave trolls a voice and allowed them to keep doing what they're doing.

Then they were gushing about the season 21 premiere based on that single promo image of the rednecks holding tiki torches.

And now that it's aired, they all thought it sucked because they didn't blow them away as racist hicks.

...

My thought is like , who frased it very good.
To have a real opinion, i will wait till more is known or told by writers or directors.
Some of these ""journalists"" tend to occupy and transform things for their agenda or believe.

>They said WildStyle will be feature a big part of the story
>oh, my, they make a gender issue with feminism against the patriarchy, showing how men raped women

They like to exxagerate like other fetishist, but sadly most do it unironic, like following a cult or religion.

And what if these gender issues are
>how women invade other hobbies without caring for it, than create their own
, like some hipsters like to do?
It sounds too vague to say anything.

I guess too. Its maybe to put Duplo and Friends in the movie, to promote and marketing the Lego Movie to a broader demographic.

>when LEGO does their research to try and make their toys marketable to girls because for some reason they aren't selling
>successfully create a line that bridge that gap
>people shit on you for being sexist

Something tells me these feminists would rather want the companies to do what they think is right rezulting in failing in the market rather than go the logical route and make money. Like somehow that girly lego line is the same as an oil spill.

>Reminder that Disney thought it was OK to let this person near DuckTales

If some faggot wants to do a story about muh genders, fine, but Lego really seems like the wrong franchise to do that.
I don't even know how there could be gender issues with Lego, the faces and outfits are so fucking neutral. Fuck if there's one thing where these faggots can tack on their gender neutral bullshit it's Lego. Like can you tell me a kid can't make pic related to be either Clark Kent or a really butch lesbian depending on what they like?

the girl lego builds are absolute shit though

You don't see these people bitching about the more adult oriented lego, like this.
Why bitch about the girl stuff?

You're just looking at the shitty ones, outside of the shitty colors things like this are actually pretty good.

So can we get a Barbie movie that deals with the fact that there's only one male character?

>that hotdog costume figure
i dont know why, but i love it

Barbie shows and movies usually have more than one named male character.

No, don't you see, user? It doesn't work that way. Sexism goes in one direction.

I want to kill every liberal i really really do right now

>Randy Bravo
What cool name. Douchey, but cool.

They just want to sell girl Lego sets to boys, and sell boy Lego sets to girls. It doesn't really matter, because I see "fruity" looking boys ask their "progressive" looking (usually white) parents for Friends/Elves sets all the time. It's kinda sad, but I'm so numb to seeing it that it doesn't phase me anymore.

t. toysrus cashier

Jesus what's wrong with making legos for the old fashioned girly girl? Why pretend that they don't exist? If it's profitable to market merch to them then they obviously do. Aren't you just telling them that they shouldn't exist? No one is telling girls that they can't buy the superhero lego sets or the star wars lego sets if that's what they like.

>toysrus
I'm sorry for your loss.
I hope you are able to find another job quickly.

>plastic bricks
>political commentary

These are people that think that anything that is stereotypically 'girly' is automatically sexist and demeaning.
If you're a girl and you like pink, ponies, dolls and Lisa Frank you're a traitor.

Boys playing with girl toys and vice versa is nothing new, which really makes most of those controversies where they force things aimed at boys to target girls more seem hollow. While this reaction is all kinds of unnecessarily bitchy, it does have a point: girls who like Lego don't need them to be pink to like it.

I've been planning on leaving in January '18 since this April, feels bad to watch the place fall. I won't miss retail though.

The more annoying part is that the girly-girl Lego sets basically only exist because of feminist whining in the first place.

Globalism and Socialism my friend.

Prices of everything went down because it's made in china.

Lego is made in Hungary, Mexico, and Denmark. 2/3 of those are EU states, so high taxes. Denmark has some of the highest corporate taxes in the world and they pay their workers well. (Because they have to, it'd be impossible to live in denmark otherwise)

So while the cost of everything goes down, our currencies are being devalued by shoring up insane amounts of debt and printing money backed by nothing, we don't notice because stuff is getting cheaper

Lego is a good price. It's the money that went bad.

>girls who like Lego don't need it to be pink to like it
You're right, they don't. But Lego needed a way to increase it's profits by selling more units, and very few girls like Lego. The Lego GIRLZ line was a huge hit with girls and successfully bridged that gap for them.

>Lego used to be affordable?
In what fucking world? I think you unerestimate how much money your toys cost to your parents.

>Prices of everything went down
>the cost of everything goes down
Seriously , what the fuck are you faggots talking about?

Also none of what you're talking about has anything to do with socialism,

>make legos for girls
>make princess legos for girls
>no castle set

dont you get it user?
the fact that legos are only for boys is the reason why boys grow up to get into engineering and coding while girls become teachers, nurses and ugh "mothers"
even tho there are lego sets for girls but thats bad too because lego shouldnt make toys for girls that girls want, lego should force girls to play with the toys they dont want, hell lego should also force boys to play with toys they dont like why should only the girls be miserable?

>legos are only for boys
Source? I don't remember Lego sections in toy stores having "No Girls Allowed" signs.

Dont worry, I'm sure half the board will unironically defend it

And I'm sure you'll pretend that's the case even if nobody does, because Sup Forumsmblr is such a good meme.

Note that That Sounds Great is capitalised. It's not a statement. It's some sort of franchise. Maybe it's code for "I'm being forced to say this". That's how it comes across, anyway. I read it in Lucy Liu-Bot's voice.

>I will always love you... [PHILLIP J. FRY]

shhhh shhhhh
dont bring logic and facts into a discussion thats all about feelings user

I will as soon as you stop making posts roleplaying as a SJW.

First off, you're taking click bait as facts and second, they do this baiting for that exact reaction and free advertising.

That's just how American "journalists" make their titles, with capitalization everywhere so that everytrhing looks important.
You'll notice that every word in the title except "on" and "and" are capitalized.

Who the fuck do they think they are, ze Germans?

Why is Sup Forums full of marks?

>And that sounds great

>because Sup Forumsmblr is such a good meme.
But it's not a meme.

Of all the boards on this god foresaken site, this is the only one that openly defended dressing 10 year old boys as Harley Quinn. Because sexualizing children is okay as long as it defies gender norms.

What the fuck does that even mean?

It's probably just some other tumblrism like pissbabies or some shit.

>But don't have WildStyle spouting feminist crap
More likely it would be Emmett's sister

No, because the Duplo represents Finn's sister. Like how President/Lord Business represented his father.
They'll probably do a story/theme about Finn having to accept his sister and realize that he can have fun and play with her and that she can be creative and isn't really a bad guy and what not.

>Says this
>Months later gets approved for a show pilot

How.

What's especially dumb is that the "normal" Legos are RIGHT BELOW THE GIRLY ONES.

They're LITERALLY giving you a choice. They're not in some aisle labelled "Girl LEGOs" or something

>roleplaying
>role
>playing
>role
>gender
>gender roles
[TRIGGERED]

Yep, I'm sure there was a straw-poll and everyone agreed on that, you weren't just gleefully biting bait.

So I guess not today then.

According to LEGO research, they found that boys prefer to build things while girls prefer to design the interior. So them having pre-built castles but with tons of furniture for the "girl sets" is kind of following those results.

It means the board is full of marks. Fairly straightforward statement.

The emoji movie is to blame for this

>everyone agreed on that
Actually, it was the exact opposite.

This was the only board that reached bump limit while discussing it, because there were people arguing over it to begin with. Every other board discussing it 404'd after 100 posts of contempt.

Wait,this is whats gonna be about? Thats not gender,and the idea of little sister vs brother fighting for toys sounds super fun.
Fuck the journalists,this is good.

Didn't they cover that in the first movie already, with the whole "LEGO is for everyone" schtick?

...

>I don't like this type of theme, so no one should
It's just a fucking choice of theme. If a girl or boy wants to play with that over another theme, fucking let them.

give me an archive link

Why the fuck where you monitoring such a fucking gay topic on multiple boards (most of which where it was off topic I assume)?
How dedicated a shitposter are you?

And yes, this is the only board when people pretending to be SJWs get responses assuming they're being genuine for some fucking reason.

who's got that sonic boom screen of knuckles telling us that focusing on an issue like gender/race undermines the very concept of equality?

also why do these fucks gotta put a message in every fucking movie holy shit.