Nate Silver SLAMS supposed "Trump Lead" after Comey's letter, with class AND wit

Sit down, Drumpfniggers. Nate stepped up to the plate Trump couldn't finish in his article this morning:

>Florida is a well-polled state, and Clinton remains slightly ahead in the polling average there, with a lead of about 1 percentage point. But Florida is now somewhat less likely to jump its position in the queue and save Clinton if she has last-minute problems elsewhere

>The best we can do is to look at polls that conducted some of their interviews since the FBI news. There’s really no evidence of a further shift to Trump yet

>Her lead in the poll — 2.5 percentage points — is essentially identical to what it was two days ago (3.0). That’s not to say the news won’t hurt Clinton, but Clinton has a variety of potential responses to the FBI news, which could mitigate any potential effects

>Let’s say that the polls continue to shift toward Trump for whatever reason. Clinton’s lead in North Carolina may be harder for Trump to overcome than our model may imply

>OK, this is getting far into the weeds.The point is really just this: Despite the recent tightening, Clinton has a fairly significant lead in the polls. Trump needs a further shift because of Comey or some other news... so we encourage you to think broadly about how the Electoral College might play out

Other urls found in this thread:

projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/michigan-democratic/
fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-polls-arent-skewed-trump-really-is-losing-badly/
ig.ft.com/sites/brexit-polling/
youtube.com/watch?v=6Z-3l7ibrl0&app=desktop
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Nate "fool's" Silver

>Nate Potassium

...

So in addition to Nate Oatmeal, Rick Wifeson and (((Bill Kristol))), which respected pundit do you think will kill himself/herself on the 9th?

I swear he's getting balder by the day.

I can't believe he's doubling down

>Nate Cardboard
Wew I didn't even read the greentext.

>story is still basically a day old
>no polls reflect it

WOW Thanks NATE SILVER

>Nate Hydrogen
>relevant

his career ends november 9th

this

Hold still, Nate.

What do you call this haircut?

i'm glad we have someone to restore sanity in this hellhole of an election. hilldawg already won, it's all a matter of taking the senate now.

>Nate stepped up to the plate Trump couldn't finish

do you think "step up to the plate" is a food-related idiom?

it's about baseball you dunce

I know. It's hilarious. Just look at how he's weaseling through this. In my OP he:

>Admits that Florida is no longer going to save Clinton, but parades the Insists that the old polling before Comey is reflective of where things stand now

>Shows a shrink for Clinton nationally yet says nothing has changed anyway (???) and then says because Clinton has "potential responses" to the new scandal, she probably won't lose any votes (???)

>Contradicts what his OWN """scientific model"""" says about Trump winning NC

>Doubles down a third time by saying that the outdated polls (((prove))) that no one's mind has been changed

Loving every laugh

The "Terrible Prediction Jew" fade

Muh sides

Cuck on top, short on the sides

What kind of balding pattern is that? Did he rip his own hair out?

>polls

Nate Sawdust is nothing more than a poll aggregator who doesn't even bother to examine the samples of all the polls he's staking his entire credibility on. And this hack claims to not be a pundit.

Tossed data and scrambled polls

This guy is going to be fishing money out of wishing wells within a year.

Nate's punditfagging again.
When will they learn? They are like addicts.

Has he actually been right about anything? The prediction that made him famous wasn't even 100% correct. Is predicting 49/50 states in a predictable election really difficult?

Nate Silver is Jewish and wants open borders to spite white people so he creates fake predictions to affect the vote.

That B.A. in econ really helps him understand the nuances of polling.'

Nate "Oversampling? What's that?" Silver

>implying he doesn't do that in his spare time already

>3 = 2.5

>nate "donald is a joke" silver
>nate "donald will never win the nominee" silver
>nate "donald lost the debates" silver

Yeah all he had to do was say "Alright this is not a normal year and historical trends are not a good indicator." He'd take a hit but with the way he's going he is going to lose all credibility, he's in Baghdad Bob mode.

It's almost like he's trying to use his opinion to influence the results to suit his predictions.

>muh polls
>when early voting is already under way
>which last time I checked had Trump leading

fuck off you jew cunt

He's not tho, he suggested Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may go red, which is not the "Trump BTFO" message he's been going with the past month.

Does he intentionally shave that front part of his head?

Underrated

The day before the election everything will be revised to show a 99.9% Trump victory.

>See? My magic models are never wrong!

He wasn't wrong though,Chicago vs. Cleveland Indians World Series is more likely because it actually happened
Trump's presidency won't happen

>I DO THE STATISTICS

I hope he commits an hero after November 8, he'll never be credible for the rest of his life
He'll have to teach statistics at DeVry until he croaks

Nate Silver needs to die.

He'll gain my respect if he commits suicide on November 9th. This Jewish fuck acts all high and mighty like he's an authority figure on polling and the election despite getting most thing wrong in the past year and a half. I'm sick of seeing his beady eyed, balding face and all of his ((((predictions)))). He needs a comeuppance.

...if even 2/3 go red trump wins

>(((silver)))
Increasingly nervous man meme.

>that hair

Can this be the new just cuck my shit up hair style?

I can't wait to see Nate Nickelstein's meltdown in the next days.

Nate Silver and 538, who predicted right up to election day that Hillary Clinton had a 99% chance of winning Michigan.

Tell me again how accurate he is:

projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/michigan-democratic/

>Nate Nickel

What's wrong with Nate Sodium?

Fucking weird Jew

Nobody cares, Nate.

>Tell me again how accurate he is:
He'd be 100% accurate if the polls were actually honest.
Instead, they have samples of 50%+ democrats but Nate "Pollmaster" Sawdust doesn't bother to check the samples.

These idiots don't know how statistics works.

If the likelihood of something is low like 5% or 10% and it happens they all scream the statistics are wrong.

It is what happens when people don't study basic math

It's even worse, I'd rather be hairless than have that cuck hair style, heck if I had money as this fag I'd get hair transplants
It looks as like it's a wig with that really rare hair on the bald part as his real hair.

Underated

Nate's statistics are wrong though

>Nate Polyethylene

>bother to examine the samples of all the polls

It's the opposite. He adjusts all the polls to fix any flaws he thinks that particular poll has.

I live in Miami and Trump is going to win. Literally the only people voting for Hillary are doing so because they are scared of Trump.

This isn't Obama he's running against. It's HIllary who is literally hated by everyone. She is actually getting more votes here than she would have if Trump wasn't her opponent and she's still going to lose.

His data analysis is approaching global warming levels of dishonesty.

Nate is a mess
Nate is a big fat statistical error
He is analysis is so weak, it's laughable.
Believe me folks, Nate is a big fat mistake, you wouldn't believe it.
He said he'd take his academic position and MOON people he's a nasty guy
Nate is a nasty guy
He's the founder of the socialist soviet republics oa political science departments.
Let's see the polling figures Nate

fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-polls-arent-skewed-trump-really-is-losing-badly/

He knows that they're skewed. He just doesn't care.

never trust a (((silver)))

>muh polls
don't people realise we're heavily into early voting?

>Nate aluminum
Don't make me laugh

>Nate tracing paper
>relevant
Pick only 1

he's such a fucking tool. why doesn't he get it?

you can't rely on polling data that do not factor in the shame factor.

if hillary leads with 2.5 % then that means she's behind with at least 2.5 %.

as a rule take whatever trump is polling and add 5 %. then you have a reasonable approximation of trumps actual support.

further on how reliable are the polling stations turnout numbers? i'm projecting that democrats will stay at home. because who the fuck would wait in line to vote on shillary?

JUST cut

Is he balding right in the forward middle section of his head?

What the hell?

I've never seen that before.

Jewish "experts" keep getting mad cause goyim are breaking free from their shackles

Thanks for reminding me that my balding is not that bad, mr. Silberstein.

This. I know a few Hillary supporters that won't for her now and won't switch to Trump, a few did switch votes to Trump after the recent fiasco, some are voting for the Green party instead, and this is in NYC. So there you have it, about 6 people I know who were voting for Hillary, 3 are now voting for Trump the other 3 said Green party. I realized she's fucked after this weekend when these Trump voters I knew switched. The whole FBI fiasco for Hillary left a real bad taste in their mouths, they know she's crooked now, this has damaged her campaign real bad.

Nate has correctly predicted the last two elections with like 1 1% error rate, he is a tool hes a fucking caclulator you might not like what he has to day but NO ONE can question his authorirty on predicting shit like this

Nate Arsenic and fucked up beta male pattern baldness

He predicted one of the easiest elections of all time

He couldn't even predict his own hairline.

two whole elections. whoop de shit.

Nate used to be cool.

If he did take a 'donation' to write self-fulfilling prophecies for the election I hope it was enough to cover the next 10 years when he fades into obscurity for being so wrong this time.

>as a rule take whatever trump is polling and add 5 %. then you have a reasonable approximation of trumps actual support.

what ever you are smoking i want some

i guess the PEC is rigged too, part of the big (((jew))) conspiracy?

October 31, 8:07AM EDT:Snapshot (175 state polls):
Clinton 324, Trump 214 EV
Meta-margin: Clinton +3.6%RSS
Clinton Nov. win probability: random drift 97%, Bayesian 99%

And Helmut Norpoth, a proffesor, has correctly predicted every single election since the primary system began (obviously the ones that occured before his career were predicted in retrospect) using years of research not based on polls or pundits and he has predicted that Trump will win.

Michigan's polls are all fucked up because (((( POLLSTERS )))) oversample niggers that don't even show up.

Lol the shills are becoming more and more transparent
>NOBODY CAN QUESTION NATE PLASTIC HE PREDICTED OBAMA WOULD WIN AGAINST TWO LOW ENERGY MORONS
get fucked

...

After Brexit why would you trust polls senpai?

It was the accuracy of the down ballot races that gave him the real push.

If i remember correctly during those elections he was more accurate then the princeton election consortium.

who am i kidding, (((universities))) are party of the (((liberal))) conspiracy

>Taking Nate Methanol seriously
Really?

because the polling was not inaccurate. Its you idiots that can not understand statistics that is the problem.

The final polls had it as a close race, within the margin of error.

>nate sodium

>The final polls had it as a close race, within the margin of error.

You're ignorant or lying. I saw the data a few days ago and it was a huge margin.

That's exactly what he did in the primaries.

>Trump will lose (insert state) in two weeks.
>Trump will probably win (same state) in two days.

He bullshits and then right before Election Day he tries to unfuck his shit.

Can someone compile an up-to-date list of all the times he's been wrong in the past year

He´s got the natural JUST fade.

ig.ft.com/sites/brexit-polling/

48% to 46% with 6% undecided. Yeah, totally one sided

Kek, noticed that, too

Keith Olbermann for sure

youtube.com/watch?v=6Z-3l7ibrl0&app=desktop

you dont think its possible weve seen different data sets?

stop pretending to be intelligent when you cant even reason that you dumb cunt

>Nate Plastic

dropped

I have provided data, and its aggregate data, where is yours?

Fucking alt-right retard, believing in meme magic instead of math and rigor.

It will be Romney all over again come election day, your tears will be delicious.