Explain to me again how that semi auto...

explain to me again how that semi auto, limited range ar15 of yours that's designed and produced by the gov strictly for civilian use can be used to fight against real guns designed for combat.

>hand over your guns goy
>resistance is futile goy
>live in constant fear like the rest of us goy
fucking r selection

Shall not be infringed

Google "vietnam war"

"behind every blade of grass"

>implying the military would be totally okay with bombing the US

...

1) if the government drones and calls CAS on civilian resistance they will lose support and authenticity with literally everyone

2) Everyone gun I was issued in the military was semi auto with the exception of the M240's and .50 Cals on the gun trucks. I had no problems killing resisting combatants with semi auto rifles.

Liberty or death.

Agreed. Why do we still have soldiers anyway? I mean, we have nukes.

i dont even understand why you need muskets?
do you really think you can defeat the entire british army with a few farmers and thier hunting muskets?

I'll take "who are the Taliban” for 200 dollars

Explain to me why you post iterations of this topic every single day.

>Malaysia
>Knowing what you're talking about
Pick one

That argument isn't going to be valid for another 15-20 years until the government has autonomous robots that can physically occupy cities.

because ENTRENCHED

Explain to me why I just put sage in options?

>real guns
please define "real guns" and also please give me a situation in combat where you would need a rrifl to fire more than semi automatic, you retarded noguns faggot

Do you really think the revolutionary war was farmers with 'hunting' muskets?

it ain't the weapon it's who holds it

The US gets a ton of shit for dropping bombs on actual terrorists as it is. Imagine how bad it would be if they dropped shit on american patriots.

>missing the point this hard

Fuck off you king George shill. We'll throw you into Boston harbor like overpriced tea.
>stupid British kike.

>Implying drones could take out everyone owning the 300 million guns in private circulation inside the US.

They wouldn't even know where to start.

The government backed off right quick when a group of armed cattle ranchers decided to stand their ground....and all of them were acquitted of any wrong doing. One was shot, however. Still, look at the unarmed protestors over the Pipeline who are getting the shit kicked out of them daily. A well armed group of citizens can still back the government down in a lot of situations because at the present, the American people won't stomach the mass slaughter of Americans or drone strikes on US soil. That may change some day, but unless the government is actually willing to declare war on their own people....

>he thinks his violence is superior than the violence the UNITED STATES MILITARY is capable of
lmao

Do you know what "guerrilla" is?

As with everyone with this sort of question you are being incoherent. You win a gun fight when you disable the other guy. The government didn't design the AR, Eugene Stoner did.

Seriously there is no point to drones when russia can nuke you to oblivion

> no point in fighting government because they can drop a bomb on you with no due process needed
> dont protect the right for due process with a gun
> gov officials pilot drones and cant be shot

Choose one

>Vietnam
>Taliban
>ISIS
WOW it's like military's from around the world are so incompetent that they can't take care of simple farmers with less than a 5th graders education whom are armed with guns and explosives...

Nukes are for defense, soldiers are for invasion

I will guard everything within the limit of my post and quit my post only when properly relieved.

>Knowing this little about guns

First: The AR15 has the same range as any assault rifle currently used by the military. 5.56 has great range. The only difference is that mine is semi-automatic, which is fine--the only thing full auto is good for on a rifle caliber weapon is suppression.

Second: If it come to civil war, I'm not going to be using it to fight against the military, me and ten of my friends are going to use it to fight our way to the power plant so that we can set off all the natural gas and put this entire seaboard on the ropes for six months.

really? why do you even need gladie? are you over compensating for something? do you really think a bunch of plebs with gladie can take down 10 roman legions?

>what is the vietcong?
>what is the Mujahideen?
>what is the Taliban?

Yes, the US government has done its best to disarm the american people. Before the kennedy assassination (the first one), you could buy full autos out of a magazine. But its been continually more restrictive.

The 2nd amendment was made so people could be armed by the standards of the US army, for quick mobilization against foreign threats. That is definitely NOT the case anymore.

Drones work both ways

Dakota protesters are not unarmed. They have shot at police and ran an unaffiliated individual off the road and shot him in the hand.

this is not peaceful and unarmed desu

stoner designed it for full auto and combat capablities in mind
the gov designed the ar15 for sporting and civilian use in mind

the gov also doesnt want you to kill people and penetrate light armor with it.

>There's 300 million drones

Explain to me how we lost the war in Iraq. We could just blow up terrorists when we wanted to!!!

>nuke your own citizens
>taxpayers are all dead
>means of production wiped out
>no food
>US money becomes worthless so politicians can't even use their billions to flee to other nations

really activated my synapses user
>population about 300 mill
>300 mill drones

>this shitty thread again

What is guerrilla warfare.
>Vietnam
>Afghanistan

>at least 10,000 people will doe of starvation in the first year

Thats not a big amount in a country of over 300 million.

with 300 million more to pilot those drones.

You realize hezbollah has figured out how to weaponize commercial drones in the Syrian war right? What's stopping us from doing the same?

Explain to me again how the government doesn't lose the war the second they drop bombs on American soil

i was getting at the fact that all the people are themselves the drones......sheeple being herded by the government

like pottery

Tell me when you need full auto on your assault rifle? Never if you want to hit where you're aiming at. Full auto might be useful for suppressing fire (not even then) or as a last resort on full frontal assault when you already know you'll be dead but try to inflict some damage on you're way to Valhalla.

Dipshit.

Suppression my non military man

>Drone Operator bombs rebel hideout
>Rebels drive by Drone Operator's home and kill his family

I got it sometime after I posted that

They didn't. They won that war because they had an actual army.

Revolutions only work if they have partial support from the military. The US army is 12 times bigger than the next biggest army, there is just no success if part of the army doesn't join your side.

>Have some guns that may not work

>Have no guns

>Why even start a Revolution, there's no way a bunch of Farmers can defeat the English Military

>gov kills you with a drone
>everyone withing a 3 mile radious is aware that the Government is killing its own citizens with drones

HURR U STAND NO CHANCE JUST GIB US UR GUNS

Why wouldn't the military be willing to cull the population that thinks it's possible stop the government with AR-15s? Just use propaganda portraying them as bigots.

"Kill?"

More like torture, flay alive, and then lynch from the nearest highway overpass.

All about mind games at that point, user.

exactly. rebels need little to no infrastructure to be effective.

CTR makes this thread every fucking day they finally got a new picture. They probably bump their wage up to 12$ an hour with this stupid meme.

>drop bombs on US
>kill civilians and some rebels
>civilians notice their friends are dead because the government is killing rebels
>civilians join rebels

Basically what happens.

>1) if the government drones and calls CAS on civilian resistance they will lose support and authenticity with literally everyone
>this is what retards actually believe

I am Joe Average. The economy has shit the bed, but I am one of the lucky ones because I still have a job. I can't afford a car, so I catch the train to work. Times are tough. Sometimes I can't afford dinner, but I make enough at my menial job that my children can still eat. On the weekends I repair their clothes. The schools are all closed. On the news I see constant reports about terrorist attacks on the east coast but my part of the country is relatively quiet. I don't know much about politics or the economy and I don't have time to care, but I do believe in stability. I want things to go back to how they were twenty years ago and I am afraid of my fragile life slipping into anarchy as government becomes more and more constricted due to collapse and law and order more and more fragile.

One day I wake up and find that terrorists have bombed the train station that I catch my train from. I can no longer get to work, and I am fired. My shitty life gets that little bit worse. Now I can only afford to feed my kids picking up garbage by the side of the road for 16 hours a day and handing in the bottlecaps for spare change while collecting food at UN humanitarian aid stations. I become a government loyalist. When the resistance comes to town six months later I yell at them for ruining my life and the lives of my kids. Then they take me out the back and shoot me for being counter-revolutionary. My kids grow up as orphans hating the occupying forces that killed me, and longing for the day that the government will regain control of this patch of dirt. The rebels fire rockets from their neighbourhoods, which the government then shells. Three years later my son decides he's had enough and skips town to join the government army.

The govt didn't seem to do very well against kebab with AK's, so I think it's possible that a resistance movement could work.

Because he's a giant blubbering CTR pussy who's too scared to buy a gun.

Rather die a patriot than a coward. Come and take it.

>how to make the entire civilian population of the country into goverment loyalists in one easy dumb decision: the post

CTR SLIDE THREAD

SAGE THIS TURD

>he doesn't know how to make it full-auto capable.

And who will pay the taxes if the citizenry is dead? They know they can't just become a dictatorship scot-free like they might in latin america, because people actually will put up a fight, and many of them.

And it isn't just about war user, it's about governance. Once your whole nation is agaisnt you, and they are all armed, how easy do you think it'll be to govern? What about foreign governments wanting to be greeted as liberators?

I'm Michael, I'm an honest worker.

Yesterday my children and wife were killed as collateral damage when the US Gov conducted a drone strike on a high ranking rebel figure that happened to be near them.

20 other civilians were killed.

Today I will get revenge.

Because having a gun makes you an order of magnitude more a threat than not having a gun.
It doesn't matter if you have a mass-produced AK or a Moist Nugget, you can put up a reasonable resistance with a gun. Vietnam proved this. Afghanistan proved this. Shitholes all over the world have and continue to prove this.

It's the daily revolutionary pill. Look elsewhere.

Bitches don't know 'bout our duplex triggers

Wow, it's almost as if war isn't black and white and there are as many reasons for fighting it as there are participants.

Dividing a hypothetical US civil war into "the government" and "the civilians" is retarded. A large portion of the population will also be government loyalists, and they will hate the traitor rebels with the same viciousness as the rebels hate the traitor politicians.

Because a majority of those with the AR-15's used to be in the military, and military bond traditionally runs deeper than government bond.

Then you get into State National Guards rebelling against DHS and all of that.

So you're a Yankee that can't sustain yourself. And a coward at that because as a "government loyalist", you could sign up for the cause and earn some shekels.

Your son realizes what a pussy you were.

>there is just no success if part of the army doesn't join your side

Sucks that the American military is known for being left-wing Hillary supporters.

>Google "vietnam war"
Comparing a US grassroots-style rebellion/revolution against the US federal government is retarded

In Vietnam like 60,000 US troops died, vs. a million vietcong soldiers and like 3 million civilians, and that was 1960s-era warfare

Now adjust those numbers to imagine how one-sided it would have been if we could have just flown predator drones over that country for 5 years and bombed anything that looked like a VC

That's your american "rebellion"

We could get support from Russia and China

I think you mean
>Drop bombs on US
>kill civilians and some rebels
>the rest of the world notices
>China and Russia rush to "liberate" the people, UK joins in too but they actually do want to liberate. Also, Canada arrives late

>So you're a Yankee that can't sustain yourself. And a coward at that because as a "government loyalist", you could sign up for the cause and earn some shekels.
This is the face of the man who shoots "counter-revolutionaries" in a shed without due process and is then confused when people doubt his righteous convictions.

>pretending to be american
fuck off zipperhead.

>Sucks that the American military is known for being left-wing Hillary supporters.
Sucks even worse that the American military is so known for disobeying direct orders

Oh wait

>drones being at all useful in the jungle
>drones dropping nearly as a many millions of tons of bombs as gigantic bombers
lol

It's called dying with dignity, you fucking mega faggot.

People in urban areas, and they'll start hating the government once grocery stores empty out and they can't find shit to buy with their EBT cards.

You know civilians can manufacture drones too right?

Oh so you dont need to take it? K thanks you dumb squirrel.

UK doesn't seem that uncucked yet. It'd only be China and Russia "liberating" us. Guess I had to learn Kanji eventually.

The most disturbing fact about this liberal argument is this:
"Even if your cause is just, you should not fight the government because you are unlikely to win."


If the founders of this country thought the same way you did (and many people did think it was impossible to beat the English) then they would have fucking rolled over and we'd have millions of socialist muslim immigrants.

Thankfully they weren't as pussies like you are.

>Dude all soldiers are mindless drones who will murder their countrymen if Obama tells them to

Oh wow so if this is the case none of our soldiers ever die? How are we doing in the Middle East? Remember Vietnam? This meme is stupid.

It's really fucking easy to get people to hate the government.

>and they'll start hating the government once grocery stores empty out and they can't find shit to buy with their EBT cards
Or maybe they'll hate the rebels, who are the ones bombing the highways and shooting the farmers for selling their crop to the cities, and love the government, who are the ones who are bringing in food and water on trucks and distributing it.

You are so naive.

>implying anyone would ever find out

If you're going to kill opposing civilians, you do like the Serbs and liquidate entire villages. So if he were a counter-revolutionary, his entire family would be executed as partisans.

>Disobeying the commander in chief

Implying the entire standing US army would support a tyrannical government and we wouldn't have entire bases with drones and attack helicopters on the side of freedom.

Fucking kanji.

Kanji is Japanese, Hanzi is chinese.