Red Sparrow

I couldn’t help but think my time would be infinitely better spent watching Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy.

Torture scenes are pretty fucking kino though, super uncomfortable.

was it better then mother?

>jlaw
No, thanks.

I had a good time with mother!, but mostly because it’s probably the best depiction of a director outright going insane with a big budget.

Technically speaking though, it’s a better movie. Very airport-thriller.

Idk it’s nice that she’s finally comfortable getting her tiddies out

>Torture scenes are pretty fucking kino though
details? use [ spoiler ]

What a lazy movie poster

Yeah, Francis Lawrence is an above-average director, I love his stuff, but this looked like derivative garbage.

JLaw wanted to play a spy, so she got to play a spy. Congratulations. The trailer was 2 generic minutes and 2 spectacular tits.

AII REDPARROOO?

There’s two notable ones that stick out near the end. HEAVY SPOILERS incoming

>Lawrence has given up a comrade to the Americans, so the Russians beat the shit out of her. Strapped to a chair, with arms and head beaten using a folded up sheet and a nightstick. She’s also waterboarded by tying her up and placing her under a showerhead while loud metal music plays

>The Russians capture Joel Edgerton, after he slept with Lawrence. Lawrence, trying to prove her loyalty to the Russians, zip-ties him to a chair. There’s another guy, who pulls out something he claims is used for skin grafts. “The blade is so fine, you hardly bleed.” After the other guy carves off pieces of his skin, which he holds up to the camera, Lawrence starts using it on his legs, then beats the shit out of the other guy with it, which parlays into a pretty neat fight scene.

>1st spoiler
this?

>one sex scene in the whole movie
>doesn't get her tits out for it

Yep, that’s the one.

Honestly, the Metal felt really out of place, but it’s only there for a second.

She gets her tits out, but unfortunately not for a sex scene.

is it post-production metal or has actual source visible?
metal is good when you want to "hide" screams

I didn’t see a source but then I wasn’t really paying attention. In either case that would probably make sense.

Well? Post the camrip webms already

i got dragged to this without knowing anything about it and was very surprised by the brutality and sexuality.

it's a bad movie though. it's wholesale tinker tailor + julia leigh's sleeping beauty. is essentially nu-cold war propaganda.

few months ago we had hot and sexy spy flick, so how "redsbaarrrooo" compares to atomic blonde?

exactly. the way she was riding the guy though.

Atomic is way better.

so is this movie Tinker Tailor Soldier Tits?

how's the rape?

JLaw isn’t really that bad of an actress but she really can’t pull this one off.
Her nude scene was really powerful though.

You can thank me later

this film is the final nail in Jlaws career

>Nate likes DP porn

Patrician AF, he's gonna bring that Ruskie slut home and share her with his boys.

Even she knows it, she's now a "political activist"

she has officially retired and went into politics

someone got paid to put her in this position

eughhhh goddamnit i hate her stupid face so much

I read the book. Can anyone else who read the book tell me if anything will surprise me as far as major plot differences?

based

>hard nips

>Jennifer Lawrence
Judging by the pictures I would have guessed she's more of a White Swallow.

What does JLaws body feel like?

spbp

>White Swallow
Did she swallow Weinstein's or just spit?

>Trash like Red Sparrow, the Jennifer Lawrence spy movie, represents the garbagey essence of most Hollywood movies. What’s worse, the film’s story of a Russian ballerina with the laughable name Dominika Egorova (Lawrence), who is trained as an espionage agent and killing machine, combines shameless prurience and violence. It’s meant to titillate something rotten in the political psyche, like a big-screen dirty dossier.

>The fabrications in Red Sparrow bring to mind the exploitation of shameless, ugly political campaigning. Gullible audiences — including those reviewers who naïvely note that the junk novel it’s based on was written by a former CIA employee — eventually convince themselves that the nonsense makes sense, perhaps to satisfy their own vengeful impulses. Hollywood filmmakers don’t normally address this sickness, but Russian director Andrey Zvyagintsev does in an extraordinary film with the unlaughable title of “Loveless.”

>Since the Soviet Republic became Russia, only six other films from that country have been nominated for the Best Foreign Film Oscar, and the nomination for Loveless is meaningful: It indicates just how foreign movies about moral responsibility have become. Zvyagintsev’s artistry makes him a spy in the house of love. He follows the bitterness between Zhenya and Boris (Maryana Spivak and Aleksey Rozin) as they divorce. But while they’re fighting over the sale of their apartment, an emblem of their economic status, the couple’s twelve-year-old son goes missing. Unable to move on to new, advantageous partners, they stall in their personal “progress.” Zvyagintsev, who favors widescreen vistas to observe exterior surroundings while probing emotionally fraught, intimate spaces, uses his artistry to reveal the entire, morally shaky basis of Zhenya and Boris’s society. It’s an exposé as moving as that achieved after World War II by Vittorio De Sica, with Bicycle Thieves.

>Loveless is worlds away from Red Sparrow’s fake Russia (actual locations tainted by dramatic rubbish). It doesn’t help that Dominika Egorova is also the unlikeliest ballerina since hefty Cate Blanchett lumbered around as a dancer in Benjamin Button. Lawrence’s Dominika Egorova (Domineering Egotist) talks with a Russian accent, but she recalls the politically naïve yet cynical American girl Camille Paglia has warned about in our jejune, neo-feminist era: This chick accepts no responsibility for her own provocative behavior (she blames the state’s “whore school”) while using her sexual wiles to her own advantage. The spy-victim characterization is ridiculous compared with Spivak and Rozin’s avid cravings and intense sorrow.

>The powerful last 20 minutes of Loveless shames all this year’s other Oscar nominees. Against their self-congratulatory PC antics, Zvyagintsev’s seriousness suggests what a Millennial version of L’Avventura might be. Loveless isn’t as great as that Antonioni film, the definitive masterpiece on 20th-century alienation, but Zvyagintsev is as clear-eyed about today’s morally different world and spiritually depleted culture. The double mystery of the broken marriage and lost child — a situation loaded with metaphorical significance about selfishness, isolation, and emotional bankruptcy — gets at the roots of human detachment. Antonioni described his film’s theme as “Eros is sick.” Zvyagintsev doesn’t just repeat that idea but updates a similar condition. His adulterous sex scenes are strikingly corporeal; the sense of physicality leads to the remarkable morgue moment when the lead characters’ mutual hostility breaks down into cathartic grief.

>In our current era of film and artistic and political collapse, Zvyagintsev discovers a separate theme from Antonioni: decadence. That is the essence of Red Sparrow, which attempts to disguise its corruption with shallow political savvy. Dominika’s trainer (Charlotte Rampling) advises: “You’ll become sparrows, weapons in a global struggle for power. Every human being is a puzzle of need. You must become the missing piece, and they will tell you anything.” It’s Hollywood’s rationale for selling us anything.

Except she's not really. Her tits were only visible for 2 short scenes in this movie, both were either split second or obscured and both scenes were about her being "le stronk female character". There's a rape scene early on where she has her panties torn off but I'm certain I could see digital blurring out of a modesty patch and then there's an actual sex scene in the movie and she's fully clothed in it. She doesn't even remove her top.

I don't even get why she kept getting advanced through the ranks and put on such an important assignment when her trainer specifically says she's not doing anything she's being told to do.

Mary Louise Parker was so badly wasted in this film that I actually think they may have cut some of her scenes.

But she's playing a lesbian in the CIA selling secrets to Russia and they DONT involve a scene of Lawrence seducing her?

Who cares about her tits anyway? They're barely above average. The star of this movie was her perfectly plump ass.