BBC`s Troy

Achilles and Patroclus...

WE

Other urls found in this thread:

tellymix.co.uk/ratings/352631-ratings-voice-uk-together-now-casualty-troy-fall-city-viewing-figures.html
huguenotsociety.org.uk/history.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

So I won't get to see white twink Achilles getting Blacked? The fucks the point then.

bitches love the BBC

Zeus, father of Gods.

Does BBC stand for big black cock? What's wrong with the British? Are they all gay cucks or something?

Culturally and academically offensive and disgusting.

>What's wrong with the British?
they are INFESTED with cultural marxism. Even their 'conservatives' are a pathetic shell that does nothing but bend over backwards for the ideological left wing.

Aeneas, son of the prince Anchises and the goddess Aphrodite progenitor of Rome.


HAR HAR HAR
The BBC has outdone itself this time.

No one is actually watching this dumpster fire though are they?

I do not care about color of their skin,I hope that characters by it self will be accurate.

whats with that? all the girls i know love black guys, i guess because of there big penis's, its like us white boys dont stand a chance. i from america btw is like that anywhere else?

If it will be good, then why not?

...

I wonder how these black actors feel when they are playing these roles that are so obviously not written for them. There has to be some major cognitive dissonance and mental gymnastics going on to convince themselves that at the end of the days it's the whites that are stealing THEIR culture

lmao at all the insecure white guys that can't handle any shade of diversity. grow up.

...

>there are anons ITT who actually watched BBC's latest propaganda series
How does it feel like to waste your time on something you knew was going to be shit?

>academically
Nigger, don't pretend. You never even read a single peer-reviewed journal on Greek history.

Also those threads are getting lame.

Yeah, that's what I pictured the son of the goddess of love and BEAUTY would look like.

The fuck is your problem? Dude keep shifting his shape a million times in the mythology. Stop being triggered over shit you don't know/care about.

...

>Dude keep shifting his shape a million times in the mythology.
more reason to not look like a nigger.who would want that?

>Yeah, that's what I pictured the goddess of love and BEAUTY would look like.

So, what is wrong about it?

People who think you are giant faggy cry baby that want to annoy you?
>this 21st century display is anaccurate
>here have my 15th century fan fiction of an entirely different character from another continent to prove my point
baka senpai

>Casualty had 4.1 million, the same as last Saturday, while new drama Troy: Fall of a City began its series with 3.2 million viewers.
>tellymix.co.uk/ratings/352631-ratings-voice-uk-together-now-casualty-troy-fall-city-viewing-figures.html
Casualty is a medical drama that's been on for decades, and that did better than Troy's opening. So no. No one is watching this.

>Venus and Anchises (1889 or 1890) by William Blake Richmond
oh no no no... look at the color of his skin...

It's historically accurate. Mycenaeans were black.

Another cultural milestone made redundant thanks to the BBC.

Who play Helen?

You guys are missing the point. It's not about elevating blacks and shit. It's about preserving British culture and identity. Whether they want it or not, Britain is going to be brown. Can't stop it.
So is it better from all the brown British to look up to foreign strange and dangerous heroes? Like some Jihadi or something? Or black American rappers singing about "fuck da police rape and steal fuck da world"?

It's better than they look up to the same heroes that we used to. It's the same reason why they're making the Victorian era browner and more diverse. Because now it belongs to them too and hopefully will act like it.

Just look at it like damage control. Britain is going to be brown. It's inevitable. But better for them to act and believe they are the same as us.

Idris Elba

>You never even read a single peer-reviewed journal on Greek history.
Not him, but I'm an archaeology grad and currently work as an archaeologist.
I don't think any serious historian or archaeologist would honestly argue for Helladic Greece to be 30% black African as is portrayed here. You could argue for a large Levantine population, but for black Africans to number more than even 1% is quite absurd.

1) Jesus was black, nigga
2) Jesus was levantine
QED levantines are black

4woke8me

Britain isn't going to exist if it's being colonized by outsiders. Who gives a fuck what happens in the future if there aren't any native brits around anymore?

>...and why that's a good thing

Black refer to few groups of people from subsaharan Africa. Stop appropriating mediterranean culture.

Are you also upset that Motzart was black?

>it's better to rewrite history than to portray it how it was

>we had to mutilate our culture and history in order to preserve it

Preserving the "pure Brit" is a ridiculous idea. Britain is made of mutts.
There were the first Brits. Then the Celts came and raped them. Then the Romans came and raped them. And then some Germanics did a bit of raping. Then the Vikings did a lot of raping. Then the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes did even more raping.
Then the Normans came to rape.

Modern Britain is the result of 3 thousand years of colonization. The difference between this wave and the ones before is that we can control this one better. We can't stop it. Obviously that would be the best option. But the powers have decreed that it must be so.
Damage control then

Yes. Would you rather everything that Britain used to be to be erased? Better in a shade than total annihilation.

>DUDE JUST GIVE UP LMAO

>Achilles and Patroclus
so niggers hate gays or not? these 2 fags were lovers

>you're gonna look up to cultures who died and cant even make shitty little tv shows with their own skin, myths that not even the people who created them really enjoy them unless it has invaders in it
"yeah I'd follow those liberal faggots, jews i hate, old whores and trannies" - muslim

Where are the "liberal faggots, Jews, whores, and trannies" in the Illiad, mate?

>
>>academically
>Nigger, don't pretend. You never even read a single peer-reviewed journal on Greek history.
What journal? I read the story and I am pissed at niggers in those roles.

>It's historically accurate. Mycenaeans were black.

Ignorantus millennial

Sending them back is still an option.

>but the law

British police are a joke and couldn't hope to stop a revolt. The problem is that brits are toothless and complacent.

Don't forget to give them your wife, sons and daughters too. Send me some pics.

Won't happen due to the boiling frog thing.
You can boil a frog alive so long as you keep the temperature rising slow enough. It won't jump out even as it is boiled.

Non-immigrant British won't revolt because there aren't any big watershed "Holy shit this is happening" moments.
Even that arena shooting wasn't enough

it means the modern society that created such a distorted myth -

as well as the original myth that goes nowhere and offers nothing but a path into a self hating dying society that loves its invaders

why would anyone look up to that

BBC refuse to cast Indians and Pakistanis in these leading roles, despite them being far bigger groups in the UK than blacks.

'Diversity = Blacks and nobody else

yeah, it is sort of strange

original text literally states achilles is blonde

They're afraid that British Blacks will look at the American Blacks and get ideas.
Asians don't give a shit about representation

Yeah. Fucking hell slavery was the best thing that happen to these people. They're going for infinite oppression points.

>our
I wasn't aware the brits were suddenly greek
You idiots flip flop or whether or not mediterraneans are white or not constantly to advance your own agendas so don't pretend to be all outraged when someone else does the same thing

>Britain is made of mutts.

It really isn't. The original inhabitants of Europe were hunter gatherers with dark skin and blue eyes. Later, a wave of lighter-skinned, brown eyed farmers from the Near East showed up and mostly displaced the hunter gatherers. There was some mixing, but not much survives to the present day. After the neolithic farmers came the Indo-Europeans from the steppe. This was a pretty violent expansion, and the tail end of it roughly coincides with the beginning of recorded history. There were still pre-Indoeuropean peoples in Italy and Iberia into Roman times.

Anyway, the pre-Roman inhabitants of Britain were Celts. Then the Romans came, and while they had a great influence on the economy, architecture, and language, they didn't leave much of a genetic trace, at least not much that can be detected in modern Britons. The Romans left, and in came successive waves of invaders from around northern Germany and Denmark: Angles, Saxons, Jutes. These peoples left a greater genetic trace than the Romans did, but it is mostly confined to the southeast of England, tapering off rapidly as you go further north and west.

Then in the 11th century, the Normans conquered England. Firstly, there weren't very many of them. Secondly, they didn't mix much with the local population. They kept aloof, in a sort of caste or apartheid-like system. Thirdly, they were overwhelmingly male. It wasn't whole families moving across from Normandy (which is characteristic of larger migrations), it was noblemen and mercenary soldiers. This means what little genetic trace the Norman conquerors left is confined almost entirely to the Y-chromosome of modern Britons.

The point of all this is that, for the most part, the British gene pool is pretty similar to what it was around 2000 years ago. There have been extremely important cultural and linguistic shifts, but as far as genes go we're mostly still Celts.

And the last big invasion was 1000 years ago.

anthony junior?

No one is saying that the British are Greeks or that the Greeks were British.
Reading the Illiad, however, is certainly part of British culture.

>Or black American rappers singing about "fuck da police rape and steal fuck da world"?
You sound like a pussy bitch who hasn’t been to a rap concert or hasn’t experienced cruising around with his fuckin crew smoking spliffs and jamming out to some dope bars

>It really is
stopped reading there

you sound like a even bigger pussy to emulate another race

Anyway the point of this tldr is that Britain is not really a nation of "mutts". There hasn't been any significant recent mixing. The most that can be said is the influx of Protestant Huguenots from France, but that was at most a hundred thousand people over many decades.

Saying that Britain has always been a "melting pot", so that flooding it with Pakistanis and Somalis is historically unremarkable, is a complete lie.

By doing this they are admitting that niggers have no culture or history. Sad!

nice reading compreheension, mutt

What part of a culture am I emulating? Smoking weed? Driving? Hanging out with people? Shit, you almost sound socially inept

yeah you totally arent parodying a nigger thug and trying to escape the truth of your own bitch made nature

That's because black people are the only ones who care about this. Even then, it's only a minority of them that do
Asians will never complain. The older ones have their own Indian tv channels and the younger ones just don't give a shit

Yeah, I have my doubts. Genetic archaelogy is at its infancy and is pretty shit at its job. Half-life of DNA is only 500ish years.

The real archaeology doesn't support that stance. The Romans didn't just "influence" Britain. They conquered and colonized it. We have books upon books of the subject. When the Romans take over a land, they don't just send in a governor and say "Just pay him".
All the conquering legions are settled in that new territory. That's a big part of why the Romans loved to expand. More land to settle cranky legionaries. And they never "left". The authority from Rome/Milan just stopped being asserted. It crumbled and went ye old Max Max.
Same with the Anglo-Saxons and the Vikings. They didn't just conquer. They settled. Are you forgetting the Danelaw?

I don't know where this idea that there were zero genetic influences on Britain. When you bring in literal armies of people and settle them, their genetic influence doesn't up and disappear

They could at least hire actual brown greeks. Or arabs if they like them so much.
Niggers don't make sense.

you're a cuckold who thinks black guys are the top shit
>a pussy bitch who hasn’t been to a rap concert or hasn’t experienced cruising around with his fuckin crew smoking spliffs and jamming out to some dope bars
lmao "im just cruising with my niggas, boo" fuck off

Brown Greeks or Arabs don't have #BLMUK

>Same with the Anglo-Saxons and the Vikings. They didn't just conquer. They settled
But not to a very large scale. I did my dissertation on the impact of the Vikings on the material culture of the southern Danelaw, in those terms it certainly wasn't that large. The same appears to hold true for the actual population, evidence of Viking burials as part of the general population (not warriors) is quite limited. Of course this doesn't mean there was no Viking genetic influence but it wasn't really significant.
>All the conquering legions are settled in that new territory
Not always in that territory. Centuriation happened but it wasn't a uniform process and the extent to which it happened in Britain is debatable.
We also have to take into account that the population of Britain wasn't really 'romanised'. Rome's urban society did not survive in Britain through the 5th century, and while the towns weren't abandoned like it has previously been thought, the people of Britain quite quickly lost the veneer of Romanisation

...

they cast Wesley Snipes? brilliant.

they dont care about latinos, persians, arabs, natives, asians

it's always black

>british channel
>even called BBC
what'd you expect?

>men spend most of the day outside
>women spend most of the day inside
damn who'da thunk'd men would be portrayed as darker than women, even ancient egyptians did it

>BBC's Troy

it sure is

It's hilarious and lazy
>hmm we could make something new and interesting
>nah fuck it let's remake the Iliad with black dudes lol

It’s been an island of useless faggots ever since anyone with half a testicle became a colonist.

Didn't the trailer for this get massively downvoted on youtube?

>Nigger, don't pretend. You never even read a single peer-reviewed journal on Greek history.

That's where you're wrong.

user baiting this hard is not healthy for you. Everyone knows Americans aren't white in the first place.

>blackwashing white characters is same as adding in black character to a film

dumbass nigger detected

Wouldn't the strong linguistic influence on the regions within the former Danelaw suggest that there was, if not heavy settling, but heaving interbreeding between the peoples?
To this day, there's a lot of Norse influence in Northern dialects. In order for that to happen, the people need to be interacting with Norse speakers very frequently and since travel is rare (as evidenced by how dialects form in Britain within only a few miles of each other), wouldn't that mean there are Norse speakers in those communities? The rural folk aren't going to the cities and centres of population, and yet they adopted parts of the language anyways.

As for the Romans, given how many Emperors (Claudius Albinus, Constantius, Constantine, etc) came from Britain, I don't think it was as under-Romanized as you suggest. Yeah, it went back to the native ways relatively quickly, but there were other factors. The Celtic Britons never wanted the Roman way of life. Compare that to the Germanic invasions of Gaul and other provinces. They kept their pseudo-Roman culture because the invaders wanted it. They liked the comfy hierarchy.
The Celts did not and so when the Empire lost control of Britain, there were no foreign powers to step in and say "Yeah keep being Roman but now you serve us".
In Britain, after the Roman power left, the only power would be Celts and they were quite happy to tear down all the vestiges of Roman society.

Are you not seeing the cast photos in this thread? It can't be good

>Can't stop it
We will try, faggot

>wouldn't that mean there are Norse speakers in those communities?
Yes, but that doesn't mean Norse speakers settled there in large numbers. People in lower social classes tend to adopt mannerisms and take loan words from the ruling classes (and vice versa). Norse/Danish influence in Northern English can be attributed to the ruling classes.

And those Emperors weren't actually British. It's true they were proclaimed here but that's because it had a large military presence.
Also, you're placing too much value on cultural phenomena with regards to genetics. A previously foreign dominant culture doesn't imply large population movement to Britain. Our culture is increasingly Americanised, but there aren't huge numbers of seppos migrating here.

>but that was at most a hundred thousand people over many decades.
Try 60,000 at the most, with 10K moving on to Ireland

>huguenotsociety.org.uk/history.html
>About 50,000 came to England, perhaps about 10,000 moving on to Ireland

If you want to fight evil, why does the source of that have to be insecurity? I can defend history and cultural preservation with self esteem.

so do they butt fuck each other or what? patroclus was achilles lover in the iliad

>A previously foreign dominant culture doesn't imply large population movement to Britain.
I think it does based on the singular fact that before modern times, the only way culture was transmitted was through people. Now we have radio and tv and all the other forms of mass media. Foreign culture is quite literally saturating the air. In antiquity, the only way for that to happen is if the locals are constantly interacting with foreigners.

I'm not saying there was a wholesale replacement of population. I'm just saying that this higgily piggly DNA reconstruction is not the end all be all of the discussion. It's a very new science and it needs time to be fully realised. Look at the fucking "Cheddar Man was a negro!" news story. Turns out that it wasn't set in stone at all. Just that maybe possible some of the DNA recovered from the shattered remains of his genome may have possibly come from genes that may have been associated with dark skin.
Even in biology, where we're comparing whole separate species and not subsections of a single one, molecular phylogenetics is running into some problems. As it turns out, to great surprise, that a single individual has a whole lotta ancestors but only one genome. The assumption with genetic based phylogeny is that the individuals genome is more or less the same as his ancestors. But that's not how it goes at all. You can share no DNA with one of your ancestors, but that doesn't mean they aren't one.

>I think it does based on the singular fact that before modern times, the only way culture was transmitted was through people. Now we have radio and tv and all the other forms of mass media. Foreign culture is quite literally saturating the air. In antiquity, the only way for that to happen is if the locals are constantly interacting with foreigners.
Culture spreads indirectly. A relatively small number of migrants who replace the current ruling classes can have a substantial influence on a culture, especially when it'a already fairly similar. When you look at the Norse influence on Northern England it mostly takes the form of loan words and place names. The archaeological evidence just doesn't reflect a large Viking population in England. It reflects a relatively small population of warriors and merchants.

>Northern England it mostly takes the form of loan words and place names.
You say that like it isn't significant.
What would it take for you to teach your children a different place name? You wouldn't just go "Well I talk to Sven every other week when we do some trading, I guess I'll start calling the town I live in different. To make it easier for that one guy"

Black washing European history because they don't have one. How very left of you.

Stealing history. How very niggerly of them.

The funny thing is Black people in Britain right now have a campaign about Blacks not being represented on TV and film in the UK meanwhile you have shows like this and other historical shows with out of place Black actors there only to make it more diverse.