It's looking like Trump is going to jail for the FBI investigation into his Russia communications and financial ties.
With Pence being known to be a campaign finance embezzler in the 90s, the Trump campaign will die immediately.
Why did they make it this easy for Hillary? She should have at least gotten a challenge to earn it.
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
freebeacon.com
youtube.com
pastebin.com
nytimes.com
mobile.twitter.com
twitter.com
Nah, yer a cunt
Excellent post, 10/10
The best part is that Hillary could pardon him, but after the way he's behaved, she won't.
10/10
Libs desperate now
haha good one.....
It's so easy because it's #HerTime
Heck, we should've handed the election over to her for running as the first female president. She's an inspiration to us all.
Have any of you actually read the article? It's the worst, most fabricated technical article I've ever read. I've been a software developer for more than 20 years and the entire thing is utter pap. I don't care *who's* server they're talking about; DNS lookups are evidence of exactly *nothing*. The people writing this article don't even know how DNS works.
Which part? That the Trump campaign is under investigation for its connections to Russia? Or that Pence used thousands of dollars of campaign money to buy personal things and resulted in finance laws being changed because of him?
Cause both are hilarious.
You apparently have no idea what a ping is, or understand the underlying ICMP protocol. You're not fooling anyone, chump.
Well you tried.
...
G8 b8 m8
>going to jail for Russia communications and financial ties.
what the fuck are you even trying to say? it's not the god damn cold war, you will not go to jail for communicating with russia. are you literally THIS retarded??
Buck Flumpf
>That the Trump campaign is under investigation
you meant to say that hillary's campaign is under FBI investigaion
en.wikipedia.org
you're not even trying anymore CTR
Faggot
>communicating secretly with a russian bank
>communicating with the country trying to hijack the election
>working with putin to time wikileaks releases of stolen documents
He's going to prison, man.
I will apply to emigrate if this happens
Did she steal it saying it was for vets like Zionald did?
>Trump
>Tr
>Treason
Terrible bait, faggot. I still replied, but only to let you know your whole family hates you, and they specifically asked me to pass on the message that they hope you suicide before they have to see your face again on Thanksgiving.
Slit wrists the long way, it gets the job done best.
Good one. Also trumpet is in revelations. I could say more but i'd be repeating myself
I understand that you're desperate to control the spread of this information but this is really hilarious to watch even for you.
CTR BTFO
A FUCKING LEAF
...
He was a plant. He's been positioned to take a hit late in the game, and they'll let him off quietly once it's all over. Probably blackmailed him into the whole thing for some fraud or pedophilia related scandal.
I can't hold all this bait.
>>communicating secretly with a russian bank
>privately = secretly
>>communicating with the country trying to hijack the election
>you can't possibly rig an election unless it's the opposing party that does it with the help of countries you don't like
>>working with putin to time wikileaks releases of stolen documents
What does this even mean.
It's secretly, you idiot. The communications are being done inside ICMP packets disguised as pings. Are you not even paying attention to what's going on?
If you're hiding information that hard then it's damning and illegal as hell, count on it. There's no way he isn't serving jail time.
Unemployed in a week.
Based anons, I'm,going to do you all a favor and complete debunk what this article claims. Unfortunately, it's a long article and I'll have to split it up. Here's my entire reply:
> Hunting for malware requires highly specialized knowledge of the intricacies of the domain name system—the protocol that allows us to type email addresses and website names to initiate communication.
No, it doesn't. DNS has virtually nothing to do with malware. There are many, many more relevant underlying protocols (like the Internet Protocol itself) that have far more relevance in how malware communicates across the internet.
> DNS enables our words to set in motion a chain of connections between servers, which in turn delivers the results we desire.
What? All DNS does is resolve a name to an IP address. That's it. It doesn't set anything into motion. It's a simple translation. It's up to the software on the client-side to then proceed to make connections or send packets to the IP address that was resolved.
> Before a mail server can deliver a message to another mail server, it has to look up its IP address using the DNS.
Only if the source server chooses to use DNS; granted, most server configurations would.
> Computer scientists have built a set of massive DNS databases, which provide fragmentary histories of communications flows, in part to create an archive of malware: a kind of catalog of the tricks bad actors have tried to pull, which often involve masquerading as legitimate actors. These databases can give a useful, though far from comprehensive, snapshot of traffic across the internet. Some of the most trusted DNS specialists—an elite group of malware hunters, who work for private contractors—have access to nearly comprehensive logs of communication between servers. They work in close concert with internet service providers, the networks through which most of us connect to the internet, and the ones that are most vulnerable to massive attacks. To extend the traffic metaphor, these scientists have cameras posted on the internet’s stoplights and overpasses. They are entrusted with something close to a complete record of all the servers of the world connecting with one another.
So these fabled "computer scientists" made the leap from foobar.com resolving to 69.89.31.56 to "something close to a complete record of all the servers of the world connecting with one another." No. DNS lookups occur between a client server and the nameserver, not the client server and its eventual destination. The nameserver will have its own IP address. There is absolutely no guarantee that any communication between the client server and the destination IP address actually occurred.
> But what he saw was a bank in Moscow that kept irregularly pinging a server registered to the Trump Organization on Fifth Avenue.
"Pinging?" As in, ICMP pinging? What kind of "pinging" was this? If it was ICMP pinging then that traffic is absolutely meaningless. Open a Terminal window or Command Prompt window. Type "ping google.com". Oh no! You must be a bad state actor!
> More data was needed, so he began carefully keeping logs of the Trump server’s DNS activity.
How was he able to do this? This sounds like an admission of man-in-the-middle. He would've had to have logs along every route between the client server and the nameservers involved in the DNS lookups. How did this "computer scientist" get this data? Regardless, DNS lookups are evidence of exactly nothing. They do not prove or even indicate that any further protocols were used or that data was actually sent to any particular server.
> I also spoke with academics who vouched for Tea Leaves’ integrity and his unusual access to information. “This is someone I know well and is very well-known in the networking community,” said Camp. “When they say something about DNS, you believe them. This person has technical authority and access to data.”
Is that an appeal to authority? Slate's perspective is "believe this because this guy can be trusted." As I've already shown, *all* these people can't be trusted.
> The researchers quickly dismissed their initial fear that the logs represented a malware attack. The communication wasn’t the work of bots. The irregular pattern of server lookups actually resembled the pattern of human conversation—conversations that began during office hours in New York and continued during office hours in Moscow.
DNS lookup intervals can now be used as confirmation of human conversation? No. Again, all DNS does is translate a name to an IP address. They are not evidence of any further protocols used or specific IP packets sent.
> It dawned on the researchers that this wasn’t an attack, but a sustained relationship between a server registered to the Trump Organization and two servers registered to an entity called Alfa Bank.
How did they conclude this without access to the *actual data* sent between the machines? Me looking up an entry in a phone book is not evidence that I then contacted that person or that we had conversations about specific topics.
> The researchers had initially stumbled in their diagnosis because of the odd configuration of Trump’s server. “I’ve never seen a server set up like that,” says Christopher Davis, who runs the cybersecurity firm HYAS InfoSec Inc. and won a FBI Director Award for Excellence for his work tracking down the authors of one of the world’s nastiest botnet attacks. “It looked weird, and it didn’t pass the sniff test.”
These statements are meaningless. Set up like what? The article doesn't appear to say. Since when do security researchers base their work on "sniff tests?" There are very clear protocols and if you have access to the data and it's unencrypted, then you can easily show that data. If you don't, you can't. There is no gray area.
> But now this capacious server handled a strangely small load of traffic, such a small load that it would be hard for a company to justify the expense and trouble it would take to maintain it.
You know, I have to hire an entire team of people just to maintain my home PC's connection to the internet?
> That wasn’t the only oddity. When the researchers pinged the server, they received error messages.
Again, if they are talking about ICMP pings, it is standard security practice to block these messages in order to prevent ping floods. This is, again, evidence of exactly nothing.
> They concluded that the server was set to accept only incoming communication from a very small handful of IP addresses.
Is this another admission of hacking on the part of these "computer scientists?" How are they able to determine the firewall configuration of nodes on the network connected to this server? Blocking a protocol (ICMP ping) does not mean that IP addresses are blocked, and vice versa. A network administrator can block any combination of protocols, ports, and IP addresses.
> “These organizations are communicating in a way designed to block other people out.”
Yawn. Standard network security practices. Oh, you mean Slate doesn't have firewalls in place to protect their network?
> “The parties were communicating in a secretive fashion. The operative word is secretive. This is more akin to what criminal syndicates do if they are putting together a project.” Put differently, the logs suggested that Trump and Alfa had configured something like a digital hotline connecting the two entities, shutting out the rest of the world, and designed to obscure its own existence. Over the summer, the scientists observed the communications trail from a distance.
Based on translations of names to IP addresses, he concluded that the parties are a secretive, criminal syndicate. Right. You don't observe internet communications trails "from a distance." This isn't the physical world where light reflects in all directions. These "computer scientists" would have to have man-in-the-middled traffic to or from this server. Another admission of guilt?
> DNS logs that Tea Leaves and his collaborators discovered could be forged or manipulated. They considered it nearly impossible. It would be easy enough to fake one or maybe even a dozen records of DNS lookups. But in the aggregate, the logs contained thousands of records, with nuances and patterns that not even the most skilled programmers would be able to recreate on this scale.
What? DNS logs are "nearly impossible" to forge or manipulate? DNS is a relatively simple protocol. These logs could *easily* be fabricated. Without access to the client machine itself, or the nameservers involved in all "suspect" DNS lookups, these guys are simply talking out of their asses. Programmers wouldn't even have to be involved. You don't need to write code to fabricate data.
> The computer scientists believe there was one logical conclusion to be drawn: The Trump Organization shut down the server after Alfa was told that the Times might expose the connection. Weaver told me the Trump domain was “very sloppily removed.” Or as another of the researchers put it, it looked like “the knee was hit in Moscow, the leg kicked in New York.”
You don't "sloppily remove" DNS records. They either exist or they do not; there is no middle ground. Again, DNS records are simply translations between names and IP addresses. These "computer scientists"--and Slate themselves--have absolutely no idea what they are talking about.
> According to Vixie and others, the new host name may have represented an attempt to establish a new channel of communication. But media inquiries into the nature of Trump’s relationship with Alfa Bank, which suggested that their communications were being monitored, may have deterred the parties from using it. Soon after the New York Times began to ask questions, the traffic between the servers stopped cold.
Did the "computer scientists" doing this research have the lawful right to intercept these servers' traffic? Isn't this entire article evidence of criminal activity on the part of the "computer scientists?" I guess it's more likely the entire thing is simply fabricated.
Wow, you're proving your ignorance. You have no clue what ICMP is, do you? You're completely missing the fact that ICMP IS THEIR TRANSPORT PROTOCOL. They're using it to communciate, which is why this is such a huge fucking deal.
>talking to people in Russia is illegal for regular citizens
N E R D
V I R G I N S
P L Z
Looks like the Russians bought out the NYT, don't let this slide!
nytimes.com
Wahwaaah, the Feds say the "computer scientists" are Total Kucks. I hope OP is banned. mobile.twitter.com
Omg. Topkek. This had me rolling.
OP , HRC hasn't been paying her shills. Some haven't seen a dime in 3 weeks. We will be laughing hysterically at you when u went to all this effort for nothing. U r fucking retarded.
>I've been a software developer for more than 20 years
Fat, 50-something, virgin script kiddie detected and confirmed.
It's a series of tubes.
The Russian thing is literally, yes LITERALLY (using that word correctly for once) a jewish hoax.
The FBI already investigated it and found 2700 packets were sent to Trump's server. The FBI would have looked into it further if the packets were malformed, so with 2700 normal sized packets and assuming your retarded secret code conspiracy, it would be like Trump got sent a 500 word essay.
Care to enlighten us all as to exactly how it's such a huge fucking deal? Where is the data? Where is the actual content of the packets? And how did these "computer scientists" get ahold of that data, even if they had it?
You conveniently ignored all the rest of my debunking.
was just debunked on reddit, check it out, hillary is now kill
...
That's the real deal here. If they have the data, they should be able to see if they were ping tunneling.
If they don't have the data, then how can they even know whether ping tunneling was happening?
And if the packets were all of the standard ICMP packet size - why is this even a story?
This whole "story" is a waste of time.
The farther they push their obscene lies about Trump the more they have to fear
Tone it down, Ivan, you'll still get your plastic litre bottle of rutabaga vodka. You've earned it.
Trumps email server (registered to egghead mcmuffin) recieved a tiny amount of packets from Russia. Hillary sold URANIUM to Russia. All traitors will hang. Dig your own grave deep if you must.
this
fuck you ctr.
>no source
Wow, you guys are really just running out of ideas, aren't ya?
The NSA has been recording Sup Forums traffic for just over two years now.
Enjoy being a live medical experiment in a secret desert facility.
...
When trump and hillary go in jail....
HERE COMES THE CHAMP
Might want to out down the crack pipe, shill.
Unless you're serious, in which case have you considered a career in village idiocy? You're a natural.
SLOW
AND
STEADY
IT'S #HISTURN
Nerd virgin detected.
>things that aren't happening: the thread
Don't give them what they want, MAGAnons. Let's all go to /tg/ and enjoy ourselves far away from all these desperate virgins.
you guys gotta come up with your own stuff
you can't just make poor copies of our stuff and expect to win