Is this the most recent example of Soycinema?
>Male alienation
>Emasculated, isolated wanting virgin
>80s neo Sup Forumseddit video game aesthetic
>Zimmer score
>dishonest cinematography
>Pseudokino affectations (to arouse the sub 115 IQ IMDB population)
I genuinely felt like I was playing a video game whilst watching this shit.
Other urls found in this thread:
>I genuinely felt like I was playing a video game whilst watching this shit.
i'd say yes
yed vode for git owwt. unpopuwar movee is baaaad. moviee mayd a noys and pinged my shallo well mt braane
it's amazing to see a post consist almost entirely of meaningless buzzwords
coining a phrase: soy foy
s neo Sup Forumseddit video game aesthetic
>>Zimmer score
>>dishonest cinematography
Confirmed. OP is a faggot and sucks dicks in a regular basis. I would venture most of them are black.
>duhhehehehehe SOYBOY MOBIE SOYBOY MOBIE durrrrrrr heeheheheheheheee
>Soycinema
What the fuck did I just read
Y I K E S
autism
Please explain how is male alienation a "soy" virtue.
Is The Conversation, Lawrence of Arabia or The Hunt "soy" then?
>sage post to boot
YIKES
>he doesn't sage shit threads
cancer
If soy makes you a feminine cuck, then why do Sup Forumssters love Alex Jones so much, when all his supplements contain soy? Do they not understand hes trying to turn them gay?
It's a baitpost and you're all dipshits for falling for it.
Such weak bait too.
How can cinematography be dishonest
>buzzwords soup
>replies with more buzzwords
They don't. Half chan Sup Forums is pretty much just overrun with newfags now. Remember us how we were, not how we are now.
Fun is a buzzword, it's for when you have convinced yourself you like something but can't come up with any actual reasons for why it's good.
DO YOU THEY KEEP YOU IN A CELL? CELLS
>dishonest cinematography
This movie is about how the children of the baby boomers, who benefitted from the post-WWII economy, have trashed the world and now use young men, damaged and unable to have real relationships with real women, for their own gains. Gosling was perfectly cast because he's your typical smarmy douchebag millennial cocksucker!!!FACT!!!
>hes from Sup Forumseddit and /lgbt/ takeover
again my dude(or xir)
YIKES
Nah, it was really good
the differences between it and the original are pretty telling. beyond just being of lower quality and less inspired over all
>Lower quality
>than Hack Ridley's snoozefest
>555-Come-On-Now.jpg
I'm genuinely starting to think Sup Forums is actually worse than SJW's. maybe it's because I interact with them more or they're louder or something but jesus christ you guys are the most insufferable cunts. soy this soy that click on a random video about tsarist Russia "actually muslims are nigger jews lol good goy" just fuck off you absolute faggots
Blade Runner 2049 is the best movie of this decade and no amount of shit posting will change this.
...
Blade runner video game was Cinema tier, this flick was trash. Villevolvo is a hack.
you can't bait me
Pretty shitty decade, then.
>beyond just being of lower quality and less inspired over all
I agree. It has zero of the magic that the original had. There is a huge flaw in the plot/flow, as well. Somewhere around 2/3rds of the way through, it just looses all steam and becomes unwatchable.
They're like SJWs is SJWs weren't normies, but basement-dwelling retards
Just as fragile but with no support group to fall back on.
Stop using the power of soy memeing for evil faggot.
>The Hunt
mads mikkelsen is soycore
you mean when mr. Ford stole the movie and undercut whatever tenuous emotional attachment we had formed to K and his somewhat interesting story in the first 2 hours?
You get used to it after a while
> don't out yourself so hard as a fag
>mads mikkelsen is soycore
No, it's Hannibal that's soy. Mads is fine.
>dishonest cinematography
Ford was a mistake. Unwatchable after his reveal. What were they thinking ?
By falling for the Mads Mikkelsen meme you're every bit as bad as the people lining up for the latest Chris Pratt flick. These men are marketing tools, not actors. The Hunt/ Pusher are a hollywood shill job made for the express purpose of creating a new "legitimate" actor to be used in subsequent capeshit releases in order to attract the "film buff" demographic to maximize profits. This happens all the time in hollywood. They pluck out a new star with an inoffensive face from obscurity, put them in an indie shit on the cheap, and bam, they now have "legitimacy" "wow look at this hot new talented actor" appeal and can now be a new "artificial star" to hinge your summer tentpole release on.
It is all fraud, a manipulation. Mads Mikkelsen is no more an artist, no more a human being even, than the new mcdonalds festive hamburger promotion. He is smoke and mirrors, a light show, a pretend actor.
Exact same career progression is true of all of the shilled meme actors of late. Lawrence, Fassbender, Hardy, Pratt, Isaac. By supporting these "lesser known" critical darling you are only enabling the pre-production marketing phase of the capeshit machine.
Mikkelsen is lying to you with his very existence.
>>dishonest cinematography
>>dishonest cinematography
what does this even mean
>Replies with stale, old weak bait
Helllooo newfag
Alienation is a virtue conducive to Soy Sentiment as it confuses solitude with melancholy, and pits individualism as some sort of social error, quite simply, it's dishonest.
>I'm a hive mind sorta thinker
Cinematography becomes dishonest when it betrays itself for same sort of self indulgence you see in a video game cutscene. It's dishonest as it is clearly unmediated by Vileneuve's aesthetic pulse (of which there is little) and attempts to reach for grandeur in a world of cheap video game virtue graphics and shitty epileptic colour deisgn created to appeal to people below the age of 30. If you think I'm being ironic then you are clearly that same audience which damns any thought as contrarian when it simply runs perpendicular to their idle minded capeshit meta narrative.
Why does Review Screw have an autistic obsession with this movie?
SEE
I'll give you the Zimmer score, I didn't care for it
Whatever (((they))) want it to mean
Why does he keep spamming his shit when he has a private twitter account?
Pseuds will never be BTFO as hard as they have been by 2049
>all this babble
You probably have a bright future in academia
>Alienation is a virtue conducive to Soy Sentiment as it confuses solitude with melancholy
What an utterly dumb statement. Please explain how is the alienation of the main character in The Conversation or The Hunt "confused" with melancholy.
>pits individualism as some sort of social error, quite simply, it's dishonest
Individualism is not the same thing as alienation of an individual you dumb ape
...
It's true, 2049 is the purest example of Pseudokino this side of the decade.
>LE BASED DEAKINS FOR THE WIN
I could just picture all of the fedora tipping Sup Forumsedditors vibrating all around me with every contrived frame of meme cinematography.
I knew it was going to be a shitshow right from the very start when I overheard some retard in the lobby wearing a Drive scorpion jacket spouting memes like "based Goose" and "wanna fight"
>"i-it's colorful so it's dishonest!"
Embarassing.
I suppose films like Suspiria are also dishonest and made for videogame nerds, correct?
No. It felt like a genuine sequel that fleshed out the world, story. They Could've easily made this a generic action sequel trying to bank solely on nostalgia. But they didn't
All this buzzword brainfarting is only further solidifying my appreciation of BR2049.
6 months have passed since it's release and still the contrarians can only shitpost against the imaginary headcanon "fans"and never tell a single actual argument against the film itself.
Why did cowardly sage poster(above this post) reply again?
It felt like a video game that tried to ape a movie through cutscene imitation
Why did the turboautist brainlet poster (above this post) unironically whined about "anti-tv terrorists"?
Now try an actual argument
this was a speedrunning event you retard
What does this literally mean? Are you comparing this to shit like Beyond: Two Souls and Heavy Rain? If so, that's retarded.
If you can't intuit the criticism I'm making you have clearly not watched movies very perceptively? Are you in your teens?
No, I just don't play video games user
yes and its pretty easy to go through the film frame and frame and watch it contrive its own sense of cinema that closely parralels the pseudocinematic aesthetic that appears in both those games, and being a good time to mention, bioshock.
>shittu bait
>R: 71
I mean c'mon
it was a meetup with Based Alaska, an alt right troll you retard.
>pic related calling anyone else soy
alex pls
If you are talking about the original 2 bioshock games I will fucking sock you for implying they are cinematic experiences. They may not be System shock levels of gameplay interactivity, but they sure as hell not on the level of the two """"""games""""" I mentioned before.
>actually knowing all those video games and referencing some other degenerate videogame shit
just switch the tab to Sup Forums my dude
check the badges faggot
>Is this the most recent example of Soycinema?
there's low budget soyshit coming out daily
okay they're still all from Sup Forums so what are you trying to prove? I posted the image because it's a bunch of cringey Sup Forums kids
How is the 80's aesthetic video game related, you stupid motherless cocksucker? The first one came out before vidya went big.
>fucking nigger faggot doesn't know what he's talking about
I remember this pasta when it had Oscar Isaacson in Mads’ place. Fuck off.
I'm talking squarely about Bioshock 1, I have not, and do not, intend to play the others. Bioshock 1's attempt at glossing the cinematic was laughable and the fact it caught the imagionation of so many Sup Forumsedditors merely exemplifies the same sort of wide eyed fanboyism that ruined the Blade Runner mythos.
Sup Forums has become a contrarians wet dream
all these slowjaks, greentexts and non arguments holy shit
you guys are really seething lmao
Armond fuck off.
I should add ruined the blade runner mythos by confusing pathos with solipsism, by making the ineffable sayable. It lies to what cinema can accomplish and then spits in our faces by MAKING ITS TREACHERY OBVIOUS WITH A VIDEO GAME SET DESIGN.
I personally enjoyed Bioshock for the gameplay, as much as a watered down System Shock it was, but whatever. 2 is better for that as well and infinite was legitimate dog shit that would fit your argument better.
It was true with Oscar Isaac and it's true with Mads. Both the exact same path of "acclaimed" low budget movies into capeshit and star shit. The fact that that's the trajectory of every so called rising talent these days shows that it's not just a pattern but a Hollywood marketing formula.
So tell me OP, did you get all the Dune and Alien references in the film? If not, how can you truly criticize something that you truly don't understand?
i PLAYED THE INFINITE DEMO AND DELTED IT , CRAPPY CGAMEPLAY AND GRAPHICS AND STORY AND MUSIC
Referential cinema is a disease. And its affect makes its dishonesty patent.
reminder that this loud contrarian was sent back to his reddit hugbox when he got exposed and utterly BTFo for being a degenerate videogame redditor, since then no trip to his name
>video game cut scene
I can agree on that. So many conflicting gameplay elements and a shitty story that exists because Quantum physics makes Ken Levine feel dumb.
>Referential
Okay, that was a bad word to use, as Dune and Alien are woven into the fabric of what Blade Runner is, did you see to the heart of the film?
I actually want to die after reading this
Like ironic or not I've never felt more dismayed by mere words
>r/starwarsbattlefront
Don't tell me that redditors are so dumb they made a board for EA's shit excuse of a battlefront game.