Soy?

Soy?

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/Meditations-Tarot-Journey-Christian-Hermeticism/dp/1585421618/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1520215252&sr=8-1&keywords=christian hermeticism
rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Soylence

Christ kino of the highest form, any other opinion is soy

Not at all

This movie was patently dishonest, psuedokino, garfield had no sense of gravitas, and the dishonest cinematography betrayed any sense of portent the film attempted to convey, its soycinema for neo Sup Forums

>dishonest
how?
>gravitas
you know how I know you're a soyboy?
>dishonest cinematography
because you talk like a faggot

Cinematography becomes dishonest when it betrays itself for same sort of self indulgence you see in a video game cutscene (it looks like assasin's creed II). It's dishonest as it is clearly unmediated by Scorceses's aesthetic pulse (of which there is little) and attempts to reach for grandeur in a world of cheap video game virtue graphics and shitty epileptic colour deisgn created to appeal to people below the age of 30. If you think I'm being ironic then you are clearly that same audience which damns any thought as contrarian when it simply runs perpendicular to their idle minded capeshit meta narrative.

It's once again showing that Scorsese is dead as an artist
Watch literally any of these instead

You've got demons young man, and your attempt at gravitas and film discussion is pure soy kino.

Martin SOYsese

True soykino. When I saw it in theatres I had to hide the smirk on my face whenever one of the christcucks were martyred.

I literally just finished watching this now and was about to start a thread about it.

>garfield had no sense of gravitas
I think I might agree but it's hard to say. It felt like he was doing a very good job acting, so I don't know if he should be to blame for the complete lack of feeling in everything. I actually think that this:
>the dishonest cinematography betrayed any sense of portent the film attempted to convey
was the true problem. No doubt there was plenty of beautiful scenery, but overall the directing felt SO fucking flat to me and prevented any real emotion from coming through.

I grew up in a very Catholic family, but as an adult I did my own studying and soul searching which has lead me away from Christianity, though the journey is still in progress, but the point is I'm not Christian anymore. Because of that, I feel like this was a very different film for me than it would be for a Christian. Really, all the film seemed to me to be about was whether or not it was a good thing to give your life for your faith. I don't believe the film answers the question; only asks it. And it is a very heavy and important question to ask.

But that leads me to my other big problem with this film: it was way too fucking long. I don't mind long movies if they're full of significant content, but this film literally asked the main (only) question--the entire point and focus of the film--within the first half hour, and then just kept asking the same question over and over again throughout the movie. Nothing new was every presented. Nothing different every happened.

>Christians are asked to denounce their faith
>they either do and are let free, or they don't and are tortured and/or killed
>repeat

This movie could have been ten minutes long and still contained everything of significance to the message it was conveying.

You might literally be retarded. Like not even joking, get checked.

I would recommend the works of Cardinal von Balthazar and Adrienne von Speyer.

Why do christians love torture porn so much?

>t. butthurt christian soyboy

>schindler's list
(((vatican)))

One of Scorsese's best

You would recommend them to what end?

triggered

I'm not sure where you are in your journey but the works of von Balthazar (and especially the Christian Hermetic corpus) may provide you with some solace. If you're interested the door is waiting to be opened. If not, oh well. No worries.

What would you recommend specifically as a hesitant returning Catholic? I'm reading Chesterton atm

Ahh I see, I was expecting it to have to do with the film.
Thank you, I appreciate the recommendation.

all sects of christianity are soy by default

I can only describe my own experience which led me from a Catholic home to a very solid appreciation of atheism. But I kept on going. I kept reading and eventually came across von Balthazar and the Christian Hermetic corpus which really opened my eyes.

>amazon.com/Meditations-Tarot-Journey-Christian-Hermeticism/dp/1585421618/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1520215252&sr=8-1&keywords=christian hermeticism

There is a lot going on that we don't understand.

For instance, a mathematician with almost no brain:
>rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116

ah, no worries. I should have been more specific.

Because modern christians and communists have confused poverty and suffering with ennobling

Protestants GTFO

*sacrifices chicken to Santa Muerte so mi hijo doesn't get done for those drug dealing charges*

man idk that tarot shit seems heretical. why should I give it any credence?