It's rather fitting that the end "boss character" wasn't Candy or any other white man.... but a black. I think Tarantino did this on purpose. After all, it was black men like Steven who sold slaves to whites in the first place. Steven is more than just an uncle tom in this movie, he is the "symbol" of the slave trade and how fucked up it really was.
Django Unchained
remind me again who owned the slave ships?
I can't remember
Spaniards who aren't white.
International bankers
who are the people who originally enslaved and sold the slaves?
tarantino has never made a good film
i dont understand why his work is beloved by soyboys
but to each his own
Jews
niggers but the point is it was kikes who owned the ships not whites but whites get all the shit for the slave trade
the world at large considers jews white
where is the evidence jews ran the slave trade or sold blacks into slavery?
>Spaniards
>From Spain
>In Europe
Sound white to me. Only difference is the language. Same monarchs and everything.
and yet they consider themselves a seperate group and constantly seek to undermine actual whites
Hungarian jews
This plot development offers a facade of moderation on a radically anti American core.
Where's evidence that Europeans did it?
...
...
everything would've been fine if dumbass schultz hadn't fucked everything up due to pride
It still hurts.
All the records that were kept?
Care to share any?
Fuck outta here, if Candy didn’t threaten to blow the head off of the black bitch because Schultz didn’t shake his hand, it would have all gone smoothly.
django unchained > pulp fiction