Provide 1 valid criticism of Killmonger's plan

that is internally coherent with the actual social practices and values of Wakanda.
>society where bloodsport determines leadership
>justice applied by force with no presumption of innocence
>rabidly racial supremacist and ethnocentric
>whatever shamanism they have isn't really a religion and has no moral guidance
Whatever values form the argument against Killmonger don't come from within Wakandan society, they are the values of the colonizers and their enlightenment theories of "human rights" they use to justify their colonizing and intervention.
>"I didn't yield and I'm not dead"
Why would they not have a rule that if you fall off the waterfall or fly away from the challenge that you automatically lose?

H
I
D
E

His name is literally "Killmonger"

T'challa wasn't dead there's nothing saying that an ex challenger or former champion can't re-challange to reclaim the throne.

How do people still not understand the moral of the story is “Two wrongs don’t make a right?”

Who gives a fuck about stupid Marvel movie plots, can we talk about how based Michael Jordan managed to sneak in Vegeta's costume for his character?

He would eventually have to fight the avengers and he'd get his shit pushed in.

>Why would they not have a rule that if you fall off the waterfall or fly away from the challenge that you automatically lose?
Also he was put in a fucking coma and had to be frozen or he would die. How is that not a win? If Tchalla knocked someone out that would be considered a win right? He wouldn't get up a few days later and rechallenge because it didnt' count because he wasn't dead or say he gave up.

wtf people taking some we waz kangs plot seriously

so if dude is about to lose challenge and he has some way to teleport or fly away or disappear or whatever he can just dip out and then come back and kill the king wherever whenever he wants doesn't even have to set the challenge place up again.
seems like rules would be more comprehensive, or at least would have been adjusted after forever of this tradition someone must have abused it before.

>watching a movie about niggers

but that requires thinking things through

Street hoods with vibranium weapons are still just street hoods.
Most African shitholes would just turn on each other.
The more developed African nations wouldn't go to war, they'd just use their upgunned armies as a political beatstick to get better economic trade deals.
The black market would get vibranium weapons into the hands of anyone with money.
Wakanda would be invaded and lose.

>How do people still not understand the moral of the story is “Two wrongs don’t make a right?”
This is abstract colonizer thinking. Why do Wakandans care about maximizing right in the world? Wakandan king evidently gets to kill whoever he wants judge jury and executioner. Wakandan policy is set to ensure Wakandan survival. Best way to ensure survival is to eliminate the colonizers.

What is it from INSIDE WAKANDAN CULTURE that informs them to not genocide the colonizers? Nothing I can tell except the values of the colonizers themselves.

and then Slavs would reverse engineer it all

>He would eventually have to fight the avengers
This is rational answer but it isn't presented in the movie I don't think. "Hey killmonger great idea but dem whities too powerful."

This is obviously a shitpost but Killmonger was the one who thought Wakanda should have been helping the rest of the world, his ideals informed Black Panther’s reign as king as being the first one to establish diplomacy. As for a need to help others, oh i dunno, empathy? Did you miss the part when they said outsider technology was catching up to theirs and they’d be outpaced soon?

no matter how advanced wakanda is, it's still a game of numbers, the entire world vs wakanda, and they would lose

killmonger's plan fails because he overestimates the climate in america and other first world nations

1) there wouldn't be some revolution, half the people would attack each other
2) eventually the weapons would fall into hands of terrorists and other groups. not to mention the government/Stark would reverse engineer it quite quickly

his sleeper agents would be BTFO. killmonger was right that wakanda fucked up by isolating themselves though, that is what t'challa learns and opens up his nation's tech to share at a controlled rate

>Discuss a movie in a board SPECIFICALLY made to discuss movies and tv shows
>"WTF hide this is so not Sup Forums guys"

>Provide 1 valid criticism
Wakanda has survived so far by hiding its true nature. Their tech is basically SHIELD-tier, but they're a tiny country with limited resources. They lack imagination and pragmatism in their designs, motivated by no experience of major conflict with the outside world (compare Black Panther's chase scenes, and his propensity for crouching on top of cars because he just doesn't have a way to move quickly on his own, to what Iron Man would do). Furthermore, the enemy will capture samples of their technology to reverse engineer. On top of that, the people they're planning to arm are unreliable strangers. They can expect many of those weapons to be turned on them.

Killmonger was an idiot who would have destroyed Wakanda. Considering his black ops background, it seems more likely than not that he was a brainwashed Hydra agent, prepared for that very purpose.

>Killmonger was the one who thought Wakanda should have been helping the rest of the world
well, no, he thought the blacks of the world should wrest control from the whites, that's not exactly helping

>that's not exactly helping
It is... from a certain point of view.

>he thought the blacks of the world should wrest control from the whites
He was a good friend.

He wanted to take over the world which is bad