Make Citadel Great Again!

Time for a Morty! Let's make Citadel great again!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Zr2HcyDL9Mg
youtube.com/watch?v=e3AzwBPnUxs.
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Morty's gonna get impeached.

fuck drumpf and FUCK WHITE PEOPLE

This generation of shitlibs is never going to forget about Obama, are they?

Oh Man, Oh Jeez

He's less Trump and more Obama, hope and change when he is probably just going to use the division to help himself.
I fucking wish they did, his terms were so fucking mediocre and even if he wasn't obstructed his healthcare was pretty much 'lol, let the insurance and pharma companies dictate everything writing healthcare legislation is haaard' terrible progressive and is the epitome of the smug Starbucks socialist.

There's a reason most progressives just sat out this election.

never saw libs get this assmad every time clinton and obama was made fun of

...

Well said...

WAIT? ARE THERE MOTHER FUCKING MORONS HERE WHO ACTUALLY BELIEVE THIS MEANT TO BE A JAB AT TRUMP?

ARE THEY THAT MOTHER FUCKING RETARDED?

Sorry to talk in all cap, but please tell me there is at least some other anons in this thread with two neurones functional enough to see that CANDIDATE MORTY IS FUCKING OBVIOUSLY APING ON MOTHER FUCKING OBAMA AND HIS CHARISMA OF CHANGE AND HOPE.

Seriously, there are reatrd there who think he is supposed to b trump? He is Obama, or at least, what people feared Obama would be, a politician with his own agenda actung under the guise of hop and chnage and the end of the divide between segreagated people.

I mean, how can it not be obvious he is a dremocratic dream, not a republican one?

I hadn't seen you post. thank you. I thought for a moment this board had completely lost his brain.

The US pays more for insurance than any other developed country. This is because they are the only developed country that turn illness into business, via dramatic inflation, sleazy insurance salesmen, and over priced health care. Thus too many families go without.

The moron Trump passionately want to remove the closest things to fixing this catastrophe with a bill that would dramatically fuck over more people, especially most of his own voters.
youtube.com/watch?v=Zr2HcyDL9Mg
But flooding over tens of billions more into the military is better... to have more jeeps to rot in the Arizona desert (like the hundreds of thousands already there) and never be used.

You can't deny there is some Trump alludes in the sense of, "He's a MORTY! He'll never win, he's so behind the polls. Everyone point and laugh!" (He wins and people are flabbergasted)

>You can't deny there is some Trump alludes in the sense of, "He's a MORTY! He'll never win, he's so behind the polls.
I can deny it. It's the most classic story-bloc of the "candidate winning against al odds" tale and this line is precisely meant to make fun of that cliche.

Obama didn't do shit to change it, don't kid yourself.

>I can deny it.
Then you're intentionally being delusional considering both Roiland and Harmon were both very obviously impacted by the election and would probably take inspiration from a recent event to put into their writing.

Do you also think Jerry and Beth going through a divorce arc is coincidental to Harmon going through a divorce?

He was an Obama analog, not a Trump analog.

Why do people say "well said" and "THANK YOU, ohmygawd" after the most prosaic things are uttered?

Considering it was just before the catastrophe of our idiot president who clearly know nothing about running the office and won't even read the bills he wish to adamantly pass, Obama seems like saint in comparison.


Obama was not perfect, but was leagues better than Trump. Perhaps it is the clearing difference in IQ, because Trump (despite his billions) is without a doubt a dunce. But at least Trump was not as blatantly corrupt as Hillary (but unfortunately still corrupt himself), which is frankly the only good thing to say about him; comparing shit to diarrhea

maybe his speech, but his underdog victory was Trump's

Because most people in america know nothing about politics. They pay attention to headlines and news clips and thats about it, so anything that makes a political reference to their mind CLEARLY must be referencing the last big thing they know about

people are stupid cunts who dont know shit, thats why

Fuck Obama and Fuck Trump. Fuck America and the whole world. FUCK YOU ALL!!!

>Then you're intentionally being delusional
read again.>It's the most classic story-bloc of the "candidate winning against al odds" tale and this line is precisely meant to make fun of that cliché.
> considering both Roiland and Harmon were both very obviously impacted by the election and would probably take inspiration from a recent event to put into their writing.

Except this part would have stayed, no matter who would have win he election, you are the one projecting.

When a character so clearly hape on Obama (or, more accurately, the Smile, from Spider), trying to equal it with Trump make no fucking sense.

>Do you also think Jerry and Beth going through a divorce arc is coincidental to Harmon going through a divorce?
I don't think it's coincidental, but I don't think the divorce arc is reflective of their own divorce. the show make a point of showing both are at fault and for reason that are clearly different from what cause his divorce.

t. American under 20

>Except this part would have stayed, no matter who would have win he election, you are the one projecting.
Except you have no proof of this because for all we both know, the Citadel episode spawned as inspiration in response to the election while it was happening.

>Except you have no proof of this
Neither do you.
>because for all we both know, the Citadel episode spawned as inspiration in response to the election while it was happening.
And as a result we got an obama stand-in. making it an actual proof the 2016 election didn't really had an impact on the episode and it was more about making fun of the political story-tropes from election tales.

Your "it must be a jab at trump" point is one of the most basic sotry bloc for this kind of tale. Not to mention, Rick making fun of Morty for believeing he is going to srcew up and he is the best so he can't lose is literally part of their dynamic.

Thinking it must be about Trump is the least likely explanation, especialy when this Morty is nothing like Trump.

>Thinking it must be about Trump is the least likely explanation
>Thinking writers use real world inspiration to spawn stories and ideas is the least likely explanation

You're intentionally being obtuse. Basic trope or not, inspiration is inspiration and Harmon has a record of using real-world events as influence for whatever he's helping write at the moment. Even if that isn't concrete proof, it's still more tilted in my favor than your pure denial theory.

Influence isn't 1:1 by the way. You can take influence from Trump and Obama and combine them and make Morty. Considering they were presidents back-to-back that is far more likely.

>>Thinking writers use real world inspiration to spawn stories and ideas is the least likely explanation
I ma not saying they never do, but in this case, the citadel story is so far from wInfluence isn't 1:1 by the way. You can take influence from Trump and Obama
It's true, you can, but in this case, the influence from trump is literally zero.

>it's still more tilted in my favor than your pure denial theory.
Literally everything tilt in my favor, as there is nothing to tilt toward your. "Lection happened recently"isn't an argument. "Rick making fun of morty and telling him he is going to lose" either.

It make fun of election sotry, and it couldn't be furhter from the 2016 election if it actually tried.

>the influence from trump is literally zero.
The entire underdog attitude is exactly how people viewed Trump, down to people laughing at him. You can't say, "There's nothing similar to the two!" and then say, "Oh underdog is as old as time". You're trying to have your cake and eat it too and it's not working.

And you STILL seem to think that inspiration is 1:1. Morty doesn't need to act like Trump for it to be influenced by the election.

Keep living in denial how a story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election somehow has zero influence to a story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election.

Not to sound like a "commie", but that is one of the glaring problems with hardcore capitalism and lack of government regulations. If there is a way to exploit especially for money and there is no law or legislation to prevent it, it will be done. This is because humans have greedy shit bags that will cheat you. Essential, they will piss on your back and tell you its rain.


Illness should never be run like a business.

>Time for a Morty! Let's make Citadel great again!

Someone else had that campaign slogan ....

Nice catch.

>The entire underdog attitude is exactly how people viewed Trump
No, The entire underdog episode is literally EVERY DAMN UNDERDOG FICTION EVER.

>down to people laughing at him.
That's Rick dealing with Morty as usual.

> "There's nothing similar to the two!" and then say, "Oh underdog is as old as time".
Yes I can, because it's as old as time AND it's an unremovable aspect of the relationship of Rick and Morty.

Connecting it with trump ois literally the same as saying "Morty eat food, trump eat food, somehow, it must be connected".

>It's working perfectly because if all you have is the most generic kind of connection that is basically common to so much than just trump, you have got nothing.

>And you STILL seem to think that inspiration is 1:1.
I have never said that. I have said that it's 1:0. because if all you got is the most classic element of political fiction, you have got nothing.

1:0 Is a valid ration to tell it got nothing to do with trump and only a moron would believe there is a connection.

You say it doesn't need to be 1:1. But when it is 1:0 you have zero fucking point.

>Keep living in denial how a story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election
You are the one in denial not realizing that what you are describing is one of the greatest common demonitor of political fiction.

Not to mention
>story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election
Isn't even fit to decribe Trump. People weren't laughing at him, they were fucking afraid. So even on that level it doens't fit with the Citadel.

He's clearly a Obama reference though

Also see Morty is not meant to be Trump in any single way.

>lets keep throwing money into the money hole, maybe we are close to filling it
at least war is profitable

My fucking god! That reddit text space format.
you have to go back dude.

Yeah, but somehow people must equal him with trump because there is a rick who say he would never win and morty has to be mocked for that.

Because any evil candidate that succeed showed in the SJW media has to be a jab at Trump, somehow.

>That reddit text space format.
?
Have been on Sup Forums since 2007.Anything I know about reddit come from screencap posted here and I always see those guys make a point on putting out fucking wall of texts, which is the opposite of what I do here. so stop trying ad hominem, you are not even good at it.

>You can't deny there is some Trump alludes

Before Trump won there were two seasons where it was shown that the Ricks consider Mortys inferior to them, so it can be denied because it's retarded

Think about the people that make this show and ask yourself again who they'd be roasting

You dumb.

And none of them ever had a Morty participating in politics. In fact, the politics were different before being a council, now post-election, there's a "leader" for the story.

Quit denying.

...

>Think about the people that make this show and ask yourself again who they'd be roasting
It's funny, because Instead of that I take the show at face value and see it for what it ist. It's a nightmarishing version of Obama with an hidden evil agenda.

You are literally getting Biased by projecting the opnion of the people in eveyrthing they do and getting on false conclusion on the process.

>Quit denying.
Denying what? None of what you are saying is still a pertninent connection of the 2016 elections.

the president Morty has nothing to do with Trump and you have to be in denial to persist thiniking he is because "the creator of the show are evil SJW".

You want an actual Trump foil? I'll give you a real one. Mr. PeanutButter, WAS a trump foil. Can you actually tell the difference?

>FUCK YOU ALL!!!

yes good

that is the first step

unconditional misanthropy

>And you STILL seem to think that inspiration is 1:1. Morty doesn't need to act like Trump for it to be influenced by the election.
>Keep living in denial how a story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election somehow has zero influence to a story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election.

Kek
Sup Forumsfags are so wonderously deluded.

>>And you STILL seem to think that inspiration is 1:1
I never said or thought that. What I am saying is that you t least need to be rahter close to the source material to be considered as an actual valid inspiration, which isn't the case yet.

>>Keep living in denial how a story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election somehow has zero influence to a story about an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election.
Acknowledging what is the most basic story bloc of a political fiction, as well as the pre-established rick and Morty interraction, is in no way suffisient to consider Trump an inspiration is the embodimnet of being realistic.

Being in denial is thinking that using a super generic thing somehow meant it was inspired by Trump,when removing Trump would have resulted in the exact same interaction.

>rahter close to the source material to be considered as an actual valid inspiration, which isn't the case yet.
>I'm going to define how inspiration is used!
The fact that there IS a reference to MAGA means yes, there's a high chance Harmon and Roiland did indeed use Trump's victory as inspiration for Morty's victory.

>Was (mainly against countries that actually have something to gain, rather than just the shit nuclear dump lands of the Middle East).
>At the expense of millions of young men, while the 'fat cats' watch as if its a football game...
Besides, we now live in the nuclear age with greater dumping of wealth in war. Hence why 2001 George Bush's declared war against the Middle East (still active) cost the over 16 trillion in debt (still rising to over 20trillion) and caused a massive influx of migrants.


The only enemies the US have that could actually realistically benefit the US is arguably Russia and China (high IQ mega powers with loads of wealth), which is a horrible idea post NUCLEAR AGE.
youtube.com/watch?v=e3AzwBPnUxs. Nukes are actually much stronger today than in the 80s, thus the damage may literally reduce humanity to nothing (if not so low and full of radiation poisoning that healthy genetically diverse reproduction is nearly impossible; genetic diseases and miscarriages would be the norm)


It would be best in investing in better health care management that actually be if its the country and makes it worth more to defend in the first place.

>>I'm going to define how inspiration is used!
Almost everyone who isna't acting in bad faith will tell you that for something to be more than a source of inspiration, it has to provide something more than a super generic trope.
>The fact that there IS a reference to MAGA means yes
The Maga was for a different candidate, who lost. proving you that THIS candidate, not morrty, was the influence of Trump.
>use Trump's victory as inspiration for Morty's victory.
No, Morty's victory is literally based on Obama. Being a underdog and being made fun by Rick is not Trump, it's political fiction 101 and Rick being Rick.

you are trying at all cost to see something that isn't there.

You actually want to make a point? Say that President Rick is whatever conservative feared Obama would be if elected, thus making fun of conservative and trying to ridicule them this way. there you would have a point.

Or I don't know, saying that the Rick candidate who say "Make the citadel great again" is a jab at trump, there you would have a point.

But your "Morty eat food, and Trump eat food, therefore, Morty is based on Trump" argument doesn't float in any water, Death sea included.

Writing more text doesn't make you more write. It's painfully obvious you want to play the deluded card no matter how much you insist otherwise.

Trump
>an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election

Morty
>an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election

Until you can refute that, you don't have a case. And no, "it's a common trope" is not an argument against those parallels.

>Writing more text doesn't make you more write.
You mean "more right"?

But it doesn't matter, what make me right is the validity of my arguments and the weakness of yours.

> It's painfully obvious you want to play the deluded card no matter how much you insist otherwise.

You are the only one delusional, You got so biased about what you expected of the show creator that you have to see what isn't there.

Again, in less word:
Generic stuff and pre-established relationship isn't something that can in any way back your point that some external event served as an inspiration.

You can't get around that no matter what.

Please explain how something being a writing trope, which by the way exists because of real life situations such as Trump winning and are not only fictional scenarios that exist in writing, somehow negates something ALSO being used as inspiration.

How is it that "it's a common writing trope" ergo "it wasn't inspired by Trump" even though Roiland and Harmon have gotten VERY political post-election and even made a MAGA reference in the episode itself leading to believe that they used Trump's victory as influence for how people viewed Morty?

You have the weak argument, not me. I just don't feel the need to consistently type out long explanations over and over again because it's clear you're the one too deluded to listen, which is why I just link back to my original posts since this convo is repeating itself into a spiral anyway.

If you still don't get it after this post, you never will.

For reference, one of the show creators stated that a full third of the nation were Nazis.

>>an underdog candidate who was laughed at winning an election
That is not trump, that is the character of almost every political fiction ever.
Rick laughing at morty is also a big part of their relationship too and existed way before the 2016 elections.

>Until you can refute that, you don't have a case.
I have been refuting it from the very beginning with obvious fact, but you seems to have some reading comprehension.

its almost like communist governments are run by humans who are greedy shitbags that will cheat you. at least with capitalism consumer goods force never ending tech/science advancements.

>That is not trump, that is the character of almost every political fiction ever.
That is absolutely wrong on both accounts. That IS how people viewed Trump and that is not "everyone political fiction" ever. Stop speaking in hyperboles because they aren't helping your point.

Saying that people weren't laughing at Trump and that he wasn't an underdog is delusion 101.

>It's a Sup Forums is so convinced everyone is an SJW they literally make up a Trump subtext episode
You used to be cool, Sup Forums. Now you get triggered by pickles.

>Please explain how something being a writing trope, which by the way exists because of real life situations such as Trump winning and are not only fictional scenarios that exist in writing, somehow negates something ALSO being used as inspiration.
Because when a story trope is too generic, it's the trope who serve as an inspiration, not the real-life example that replicate it.

Especially if the character in question act nothing like the person you think it inspire itself from. You keep saying it doesn't need to be 1:1, but it's not even close to it.

When the only way you can link a fction to an event is from generic sotry-telling, then it's not based on that even it's based on the classic trop material.

>even though Roiland and Harmon have gotten VERY political post-election and even made a MAGA reference in the episode itself l
Because the MAGA IS what is inspired by trope, because that is actually something you can nail on trope. underdog winning is a basis of storytelling and can't be single out on trump, not if it's the only thing that allow you to make the connection.

>You have the weak argument, not me.
You only having a generic trope to connect to trump is what make your argument weak.

The fact that Rick often make fun of Morty is what make my argument stronger.

>If you still don't get it after this post, you never will.
I hope that you will get that "generic stuff happens in show therfore it must be based on precise event" is flawed in the first place and will never make you have a point.

For something to be a sourceof inspiration, you have to have some unique quality that link the two. The morty candidate has nothing of the sort with Trump.

You want the Trump Foil, complain about the "The rents are too damn high" Rick. then you'll have a point.

Not going to read your terribly written long posts until you can refute this: which you have yet to successfully do.

>and caused a massive influx of migrants.
war didnt cause migrants
>debt
obama is the king of debt and you love him

war is just whatthe us does when the economy is shit, who do you think is developing all those cool robots that are suppossed to replace the work force?

>That IS how people viewed Trump and that is not "everyone political fiction" ever. Stop speaking in hyperboles because they aren't helping your point.
the fact that Trump has parallel to fiction doesn't mean he become the source of inspiration of that trope if the trope pre-date him.

If the trope predate him, then that trop is the source of inspiration it's baisc logic.

>Saying that people weren't laughing at Trump and that he wasn't an underdog is delusion 101.
I never said it isn't the case. I am saying it is too generic of a setting to consider Trump the inspiration of the Morty Candidate, especially when the Morty candidate is 100% the Obama the conservative feared to be.

>I won't admit you're right until you prove the one coincidence I'm clinging on is false
I would laugh but the fact this is how people do discussions makes me sad.

>until you can refute this:
I already have>Generic stuff and pre-established relationship isn't something that can in any way back your point that some external event served as an inspiration.
Succefully.

somehting being similar to a generic trope who also happens in real life isn't enough to consider the real life event a source of inspiration Especially if there is nothing else to make the connection.

You have nothing and are trying at all cost to project trump hate into a character that is in no way a representation of him.

> I am saying it is too generic

Trump & Morty Campaign
>Media mocks him
>People on the debate podium mock him
>Other candidates mock him
>Half the citadel/country mock him
>Even his own people (The one Morty assistant) was against him

Obama's campaign did not function that way. Bush's campaign did not function that way. It's very recently unique to Trump.

Because I'm not going to waste my time actually bringing up "new" points when you can't even argue against the existing old ones.

>Succefully.
Laughable and delusion. Also "successfully".

How is it a fucking delusion when Obama became the first black president? Are you retarded or just not American?

Because the media pushed for Obama to win and in fact people voting for Obama because he's black became a popular joke back when he was running. Him being the first black president is not at all the same underdog story considering he had tons of support vs. Trump where every single person was against him and pushed the narrative he would lose and then all got shocked when he won.

>>Media mocks him
>>People on the debate podium mock him
>>Other candidates mock him
>>Half the citadel/country mock him
>>Even his own people (The one Morty assistant) was against him
Again, if all you have is the classic underdog trope, what you have is not a point, but a coincidence.
>>Even his own people (The one Morty assistant) was against him
You know that most people inside the Trump campaign organisation actually believed in him, right?

>Obama's campaign did not function that way.
It doen't need to be 1:1. What make President Morty Obam is his speech on hope and change.

>but a coincidence.
And that is why I keep calling you delusion and don't bother trying to argue against you. You have nothing to argue against.

You've openly admitted to saying Harmon going through divorce is coincidental to pushing Jerry and Beth to a divorce season-long arc, so it's pointless to convince you otherwise.

>It doen't need to be 1:1.
Ex-fucking-actly. Which is why it's Morty put in Trump's situation but giving Obama speeches. You basically just agreed with me, you dip.

>You know that most people inside the Trump campaign organisation actually believed in him, right?
Also I was speaking about the RNC, not his campaign manager. Again, not 1:1.

>just going to use the division to help himself.
You just described Trump, my boy. Try to deny it. You can't.

>Speeches are inspired by Obama talking about hope, even though hope speeches are also generic tropes
>But Trump underdog victory is just coincidence

>>
>Middle Eastern migrants, not the textbook dictionary term.
Turning the Middle East into warzones of trigger happy on edge solders against radical ISIS resistance in areas literally afraid of missile bared drone at random is blatantly the biggest contributed factor for the relatively recant boom in Islamic migrants just trying to get away from the rubble and carnage; to which genuine terrorists follow and cause deadly havoc to western citizens.

This is undeniably glaring. You would honestly have to be too stupid, sociopathic, and/or autistic in regards to basic human understanding to not realize this; perhaps too 'on the nose' to where your eyes overlapped it...


>2001 Bush factually cased the most debt in recent US history
Obama was not perfect, but he was basically managing the shot fest left behind by the majorly incompetent warmongering Bush that caused the crash and lead people voting democrat.

Quoted wrong perso n

Is a reply to

>And that is why I keep calling you delusion and don't bother trying to argue against you. You have nothing to argue against.
I have nothing to argue against, indeed, because all you have is a coincidence.
You are taking the one element coming formt he classic underdog trope and trying to say that it is inspired by trump, whereas that trop has existed long before him. This menas you have nothing.

for something to be a source of inspiration, it has to be more than generic stuff, otherwise, you have nothing.

>You've openly admitted to saying Harmon going through divorce is coincidental to pushing Jerry and Beth to a divorce
I have said the opposite, I have said it is linked, but Ihave laso stated that what they are going through is different that what Hamon is going through.

>Ex-fucking-actly. Which is why it's Morty put in Trump's situation but giving Obama speeches.
Except he isn't put in Trump's situation, he is put in a classic underdog sitution which happens to be the ituation, and many other real and non real characters were put in too.

Because it is so genrric, it can not be single out to Trump., because it is so generice, the trop itself is what served as an inspiration, not trump.

>Ex-fucking-actly. Which is why it's Morty put in Trump's situation but giving Obama speeches.
Never did, you lack basic reading comprehension.

it doesn't need to be 1:1, but it need to be more than 1:generic stuff that exist in many story already.

In this case it isn't.

I mean, fuck you have your Trump foil in the very same episode making Morty redundant as a Trump foil too.

But nothing Morty does has any parallel to Trump. There's nothing that could be translated as what people call racism or sexism, there's no calls for "us vs them". Everything he says is very positive and very much about unity. How is it a jab at Trump, unless anti-Trump people think just having an evil leader=Trump

Ronald Reagan?

>Again, not 1:1
It doens't need to be 1:1 but it need to be more that "genric stuff that also happened in real life happend in the show" and that's all you've got.

"It doesn't need to be 1:1", isn't an argument in you favor, "it doens't mean to b 1:1" doesn't mean "generic stuff happened in both case" is enough".

Still not going to read your long posts until you refute how this: is NOT Trump. And again, "it's a coincidence" is not a counter-argument.

>"it's a coincidence" is not a counter-argument.
Yes it is.

And I have refuted your argument several times: If the only connection you have is a genrric stuff, then you don't have an actual connection. an inspiration mean there is something peculiar you can actualy make the connection with.

>Still not going to read your long posts
This >long post
Have you the attention span of a goldfish?

>Middle Eastern migrants, not the textbook dictionary term.
you mean african and no, it didnt cause migrants
corrupt people smugglers who charge people to get them on a boat and dump them in europe and corrupt goverments did
>bush caused the most debt
thats wrong, obama caused most debt
>obama wasnt perfect
>he just betrayed his voters, bought the banks debt, sold your privacy and caused more racial tension that we have seen in 50 years
but he was charismatic and handsome and he made you feel good about yourself, so who cares if he got rid of laws that are suppossed to stop the spread of propaganda

I quoted both the posts you dingbat, stop being obtuse.

>Yes it is.
No it's not, it's benefit of the doubt. That is not an argument.

>And I have refuted your argument several times
No you haven't.

>If the only connection you have is a genrric stuff
Calling random stuff generic does not make it true.

>until you refute how this: is NOT Trump
YOur logic fail because you think thus need to be not Trump for you to be proved false.

It doesn't need to. For you to be proved wrong the single requirment is to prove that it's simply generic trope.

that alone deter your point.

GTFO Sup Forums
No one wants you here.

I have a better idea. Why don't you get on some medication so you can stop obsessing over a fucking cartoon depicting your precious president as evil?
Then maybe you can learn that an episode about politics doesn't have to side with one precise party, that a character that's been set up for years as a scheming, shadowy villain hardly works as a parody for a populist loudmouth, and that this SJW witch hunt has seriously started to get annoying.

>that it's simply generic trope.
Name me another president in the last 50 years where the media, half the country, and his own convention were against him, who was predicted to lose for several months in a row, by everyone with narrative power and ended up winning and causing a big shocked reaction.

Name me one.

>No it's not, it's benefit of the doubt. That is not an argument.
Benefit of doubt doesn't work that way.

You have to establish a connection stronger than a simple generic stuff to proof your connection. You have failed to do so so far.

>No you haven't.
Yes I have. if all you can provide is a classic trope, then you don't actully have a connection to trump.

>Calling random stuff generic does not make it true.
It's not random. Underdog story is a classic trope in political fiction.

>Why don't you get on some medication so you can stop obsessing over a fucking cartoon depicting your precious president as evil?
I'm surprised you can type considering you can't read. Point out where I was insulting Trump for being evil.

But this Morty was using the exact opposite rhetoric Trump used.

He sounded more like an Obama parody

>stronger than a simple generic stuff
Not generic stuff and it will continue to not be generic until you can refute You have no case. Your delusion is on a grand level.

>Name me another president in the last 50 years where the media, half the country, and his own convention were against him
there is your mistake. I never siad Citadel was based on an other real life example. I am talking about the world of fiction where your description is plenty.

You know Rick andMorty is a work of fiction, right?

>The media was against Trump

This is a very powerful meme user I'm going to have to ask you to be more responsible next time.

>until you can refute
seeI never argued that Morty being the underdog was based on real life events.

I have actually claimed the OPPOSITE the whole time. I have claimed that President Morty being the underdog IS NOT based on real life event, but, on THE CONTRARY, is based on the work of fiction it is parodying.

Christ you basically just agreed with me again and tried to make it sound like you aren't.

I've made my point and apparently you agree with it, too. So that's the end of this discussion. And if you want to continue it, you're going to have to name that president I asked for otherwise as far as I'm concerned, this is just going to be several more posts of you repeating your non-existent point.

Dear Mods:

Please delete this thread. It is not Sup Forums. It has devolved into political shitslinging.