Thoughts on Call Me By Your Name?

Thoughts on Call Me By Your Name?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=limyIHxyQLU
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Timothee needs to keep his hair short.
The ending was painful.
I hope Elio is salty in the sequel just like he is in the epilogue of the book.

It was trash.

Is that Rabiot?
TSIUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

I saw it when it was called loving Annabelle

mad gay

Fake and gay

Why is there picture of David Luiz?

People who hate on it on Sup Forums have never experienced intense love before.

Timmy is an uglier, older, more boring and probably less talented version of Finn Wolfhard

I think it was a big step up from one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Oscar worthy for hollywood, but when Spacey does it his career goes dead.

topkek

>how to read a film
Why did you add this amazing book into your meme shitpost image?

youtube.com/watch?v=limyIHxyQLU

user the funny part about it is that it appears in every harry potter thread and it's the posters duty to get there and post it as soon as possible.

When you post it in any random thread it gets less and less funny, stop.

*makes out with Veratti*

Do you watch movies with your ass? What the fuck have you just said, you might have simply read the book and looked at that faggot's pictures if these are the only comments you can make about this movie.

disgusting newfag imposter, back to plebbit with ya

...

gay pedo movie

The new broke back mountain.

this

Well, he surely got fucked tonight

wew

He looked like a doofus with shorter hair. He's at his peak right now.

I want an explanation behind this outfit

he looks good either way

What's there to explain?

I will, and after i do, i'll watch one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

reminder you are a pedo if you like this movie

topjej

its Off-White pleblord