Debunk Religion

Debunk a religion with one image. I'll start

Pls no dividing user

There's no evil in Heaven because Heaven is full of only people who do not sin

This isn't complicated

This

You can only go to Heaven if you voluntarily choose to accept God, meaning you don't want to sin, meaning God will repair your heart so that you have no more sin by your request.

If you do not wish this, you can go to Hell which, contrary to popular belief, is less of an eternal torture and more of a permanent "apartness" form God.

God is perfect and without sin, so he can't be in the presence of sin, so he can't exist in his "true form" in a realm with sin, so we cannot live in the same realm as God unless we have no sin. This is why Hell is necessary for those who do not forgo sin.

This

As "Starship Troopers" pointed out, conflict is a result of limited resources.

Thus, in a well-run world with enough resources, everything physically possible could be moral.

do people think heaven is a big white room where everyone chills out and chats about stuff for eternity?

how could you even have a concept of free will in a place of eternal happiness?

Nice theology, bro. This guy gets it.

Sidenote, as someone interested in theology

The concept of free will is pretty much used as a way to justify evil. Why the fuck would you want it? The origin of free will and human 'consciousness' is when Adam and Eve ate the fruit of knowledge. It showed them sin and evil for the first time. Why is that something to be maintained?

It isn't. If your thoughts about Heaven are to go and kill people because they're sinless and you have free will - you're not going to Heaven. Flat.

Nice baseless claims. Whose ass did you pull that out of?

No, he's as lost as you

Why do people think God is a cute loving old man?

He's literally supreme above all things, your vision of what's right or wrong doesn't apply.

God owns you, and when you disobey him you're basically the robber. Hell is prison for robber scum.

>He

Why does he need a penis? What is it for?

>inb4 god is trans

Damn, you're a slave to your imaginary friend? Blue pilled as fuck

God doesn't have a gender.
It's just that the word "Deus" in Portuguese is masculine and I'm used to referring to it as "ele", or "he".

You could also say that God is seen many times as the father of Jesus or something of the sort.

Edificio is masculine in Spanish but I don't call buildings "he".

Why father? Why son? It should be parent and child

Well, probably because at the time the bible was written, the father was mostly the leader or dominant figure. And since God sent a man, not a woman, Jesus is called Son, and not Daughter.

Makes perfect sense if it's all made up by a semitic culture thousands of years ago

It did before and it still does.

Free will requiring the existence of evil does not necessarily mean both must be in the same place. Do you think evil people get into heaven?

>Do you think evil people get into heaven?

I don't know. Can you check for me?

Notice how you couldn't even debunk it with three images, let alone one. It's almost as if the concepts behind God are fairly complex and can't be explained by fucking image graphics. Really made me think

See

There is only one god

This is now a kek thread

Praise him

What?

Praise kek

Nice digits

>assuming humanlike rationality and morality for a divine being

You can't assume behavior based on "this is what a perfectly moral being would do in this situation". You don't provide for there being conflicting factors - like God destroying evil, but doing it in a method that isn't instant. God has a personality and emotion, that's for sure.

We're talking about a God with the specific property of creating the universe. If we say Russell's teapot created the universe, sure.

We define God as "the being that created the universe". If we go on the rather reasonable assumption that there is a creator being, there is God. We define Russell's teapot as a thing that cannot be sensed.

Hardly the same. If we define Russell's teapot as the creator deity, we can work with it.

>not an argument
>restating Christian theology (John 3:16 is exactly the point he's making, that Christ gave himself up to save people from the suffering of the human realm)
>calling the Crucifixion a human sacrifice to make it sound worse because liberal morality

The reason Christ was sent to the Middle East was twofold: this was where the righteous people lived, and because the development of the Roman Empire will develop Christianity across the world. God is a pretty smart lad, after all. He knows that the Chinese will not dominate the world with their culture and spread Christianity. Why preach there? Who cares? The Chinese aren't colonizing.

...

He gets it from Catholic theology fucktard it Church dogma

Where'd they get it? Their ass?

If a god damns you to eternal suffering for not following his very specific rules that are unclear if they are even the true religion, then it is an evil god.

So god either doesn't exist, or is malevolent.

The discovery of life elsewhere in the universe would religion's stories in the trash.

Problem of evil does not disprove God in any meaningful way.

The Bible mostly.