Guys is this legit? Can anyone confirm? We know they wanna fix it but really? 8% for Johnson? Who is going to believe this?!
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
Andrew Williams
Other urls found in this thread:
web.archive.org
interactives.ap.org
ftpcontent2.worldnow.com
82.221.129.208
youtube.com
franklyinc.com
linkedin.com
franklyinc.com
crunchbase.com
bloomberg.com
raycommedia.com
raycommedia.com
google.com
twitter.com
Landon Myers
web.archive.org
this shit is not b8 op is telling the truth I archived it to prove it exists
Eli Morales
ummmmmm witnessed your triple dubs.... ummm im op and I am now scared.
Hudson Ortiz
Tell me what the triple dubs have told you.
Jackson Mitchell
triple dubs kek
Carter Rodriguez
>its IMPOSSIBLE to fake this page!!!!!
incredible
Liam Sullivan
Test data. All news networks are running site tests with fake data.
Landon Ward
Leaf, I didnt create the image or its text. A friend sent it to mover discord. I hope its a smoke screen. But screen cap it guys, if you see 8% for Johnson, you knew the fix is real.
Easton Smith
kek has blessed my post
A FUCKING LEAF is denying the page exists
someone, somewhere created this deception and that my friend is not fake. you cannot deny it's existence.
thank you for correcting the record
James Thompson
that makes sense. now I feel like I can go to bed. none the less. Save the image and remember the percentages for comparison.
Christopher Scott
Here's the AP tests.
interactives.ap.org
Asher Diaz
>I DON'T LIKE THE RESULT SO IT'S FAKE!!11!!
Trump kiddies aren't republicans, they're whining kids
Owen Wright
They all use the same numbers
Zachary Bennett
hey did you notice the numbers of the same? Thats an odd coincidence.
Cameron Phillips
why do they all use the same numbers?? and who gave them the numbers??
Joshua Powell
I hope you are a paid shill. Not an actual retard.
Parker Sanders
Yes. Every instance I've come across (10+) have the same data. They all probably get the same feed from the same central place.
Adrian Ward
WTF are we looking at guys? Is this like that time we found the Sandy Hook charity pages setup in advance of the shooting?
Kayden Young
Should that be reassuring? Or panic inducing?
Aiden Phillips
this is legit multiple anons have archived it, bookmark this link for when people say it's bullshit:
web.archive.org
Bentley Cox
So the question is, are we looking at place holder values distributed from a central location, or are we seeing the fix?
FUCK, I know we wont know until the 8th...
Christian Kelly
Don't think it's anything to worry about. They all get the same data for presidential probably from some fed agency, and a different feed from the state for local ballot items.
Technologicly, it makes sense.
Thomas Myers
if it were a single news site with these numbers, it would be a prank
since multiple sites apparently are using these numbers, you have to wonder who decided which numbers to use? why not an even split between all presidential candidates?
Gavin Lopez
Thanks user, I need some gentle head patting and back rubbing before bed.
This election! If its not toe to toe nuclear combat with the rooskies its alien false flags, election fraud, and crime families.
Luke Campbell
>worldnow.com
seems legit
Thomas Carter
Just when I felt almost comfy. You have a point.
In the hopes of getting to sleep, im going to go with all the media wants trump to lose so the numbers were not a split but in hillarys favor.
Meanwhile im screen capin like a madman and bookmarking too, then emailing copies to myself and uploading to my dropbox
If these numbers pop up....
Jack Campbell
They all need to get the data from a centralised place on election day, so it's likely they tested through a centralised agency. Stop concern trolling each other, screencap/bookmark just in case and move on to more important things.
Liam Gray
worldnow.com redirects to frankly which is some sort of application development platform which would make sense, look at all the political shit on their home page. go ask Sup Forums to figure out who owns that shit and whether or not it seems legitimate. it seems like a contracted platform to tally votes for the news stations.
Oliver Jones
I don't. We're finding sites that aren't suposed to go live yet. Pretty sure some developer just randomly generated some numbers for testing without paying it much attention. I do the same when making test data when developing.
Easton Hughes
if we can figure out whose company is doing the developing then maybe we can find out whether or not it's on the clinton foundation or dnc payroll
Brody Harris
Dubs of Hitler and good advice! Heil Man from down under!
Aiden Baker
Good idea. Let me know what you discover. I need to get away from this fucking battle station!
Christopher Jackson
There hasn't been an election since 1992 with under 100 million votes. Turnout since has only increased.
Ethan Ross
This.
>After everything that's came out she wins by a bigger margin than Obama did
Would literally never happen and no one would believe it.
Cooper Nguyen
82.221.129.208
a billion and a half dollars can buy a lot of election officials.
Gavin Brooks
>is this legit
is it Nov 8th? lol jesus christ
Jeremiah Garcia
that website is run by a really angry boomer lmao the info is good but jesus christ the way that dude writes cracks me up
Matthew Watson
Oh. Look. Found a CompuServe site.
Cooper Gutierrez
If this is true and happens I can forgive the rest of his ravings
Jaxson Foster
yeah, oh user, make sure you submit a FOIA request so that the FBI will publish the stuff to the website from the other thread earlier
Noah Moore
looks legit
James Nelson
They've been pushing the blue Texas meme for a very long time now. Even early voting has many alarming reports of voter machine fraud in Texas
Daniel Hernandez
Okay fellow Anons as well as Shills, I am going to bed. its 4 am on the eastern seaboard. I need to shut down and pass out. But I will rest better knowing you guys saw this and are doing some noodling over it.
Ill probably restart the thread tomorrow to increase exposure. Feel free to restart it yourselves. We should probably get some saturation on this.
I hope I am not diverting valuable user resources on a lark. But it made me get a bit freaked out. I know I can always count on you guys to make it worse.
MAGA
Levi Powell
Can confirm. Idaho is blue.
Jace Edwards
do not fret user, we cannot worry too much for things we have no power over. We can only watch to see if it all comes crashing down, and then we rebuild. May America live on in all her glory
Elijah Long
>Update
has anyone emailed any of these outlets and asked them what these are about? Why am I NOT supposed to think this shows the election is rigged? I have screen capped several of these things ... if we see these exact results given for 100%... I have to tell you ... This country is completely fucked... there is no way in hell we will sit still for this .. no way in hell.
Christopher White
It's a hoax by a liberal San Francisco based media company that's familiar with and/or linked to making official graphics for TV stations, and they fabricated it.
OR, it's real.
At first it looks legit as far as that is an actual archived picture, but can't find a link between worldnow.com (the FTP storage host) and WRCBtv.com
web.archive.org
worldnow.com redirects here: franklyinc.com
Franklyinc is an online media company: linkedin.com
I don't see WRCBtv.com listed as one of their case studies, which I'd think would be there
The founder is an ex Goldman analyst
crunchbase.com
Hmm, but wait - bloomberg.com
one of the members of the board owns this company:
raycommedia.com
No links between the two that I can find, past or present: google.com
SO, it's a hoax by a liberal San Francisco based media company that's familiar with and/or linked to making official graphics for TV stations, and they fabricated it.
OR, it's real.
Elijah Jenkins
>interactives.ap.org
While this looks sketchy as fuck and will absolutely be cited should the final numbers come out exactly the same, there are some serious logical probs with the map:
>Delaware Red
>Massachusetts Red
>Minnesota Red
>Oregon Red
>South Carolina Blue
>Wyoming Blue
>Texas Blue
There's pretty much no way ^that could happen without everyone knowing the election was rigged. Also suspect is that voter turnout would be down like 20mil. So this probably actually is just test data....though again, Sketchy as fuck.
Nolan Wilson
well I just emailed the AP and asked for an explaination
I can see a plausible answer is its just a dummy mock up to see that it works despite what Jim Stone insists
if these websites are just essentially containers and the real election numbers will be input by worldnow from official sources I can accept that
not that those results couldn't be illegitimate
Tyler Diaz
this
Benjamin Wright
Save the image and watch the number of votes.
Brandon Thomas
probably just a test
Juan Davis
Are they really trying to ban bare fucking for my porn!!?? REEEEEEE
Bentley Barnes
Hmmm
Josiah Jenkins
Fake
Blake Cook
I'm pretty sure it's dummy numbers for testing, just like the Wisconsin thing back then.
Jose Powell
What's the discrepancy here? Johnson has over 8%? Believable for now, but not two days from now when the actual effects of that bastard Weld backstabbing us kicks in.
Xavier Baker
Test data from their API's/databases. Save for just in case stuff but it's very likely nothing