besides """"sexually assaulting"""" his robots what did he do wrong?

besides """"sexually assaulting"""" his robots what did he do wrong?

Attached: exmachina.jpg (973x543, 438K)

made a program that was designed to escape its cage

Taunting the only two entities with free will inside his compound to make them hate him and still act shocked when they murder him.

He created that movie's version of facebook

Attached: 1502247647099.jpg (318x159, 6K)

He literally did nothing (morally) wrong. I loved how they showed the montage of him literally just building robots while caleb watched being all super judgemental with the creepy music. He did what he could to follow standard AI protocol that all programmers agree on and was treated like a villain for it.

He shouldn't have installed batteries in them so a power shut down would mean the androids just turned off.

He was "morally wrong" insofar as the narrative stating AI was itself a bad thing

he didnt program a longer dance routine. seriously one of my favourite scenes in all kinography

Attached: Getting down with my sexbot.webm (1280x530, 2.27M)

Nothing. Redhead was fucking weak and was manipulated using his weak morals. I thought that was the message of the film?

why would the same helicopter pilot that flew Caleb in at the beginning take a woman on board knowing he had explicit orders to pick up Caleb and Caleb only?

I was wondering the same.

Nothing

Nothing. I don't think he was supposed to be the villain and the audiences were made to realize that in the final reveal. I actually like the movie for subverting that trope and have the protagonist be wrong and the antagonist who "mistreated" his robots be right.

i loved the music in that scene. so tense.
but yeah it's a guy building and testing shit. it's just objects.
he's definitely not a villain imo. it's just the protagonist that's a literal beta loser that got tricked by a qt robot to kill caleb for her escape

Started watching this but fell asleep, literally

Not due to the movie per se, I was just tired, but I don't think it helped.

It's one of the better sci-fi movies out there. You should watch it properly.

designed a robot to escape and then be surprised when it escapes

He programmed a robot with what appeared to be normal human strength to hate him and provided her the means to escape. He also abused his other, free range robot with access to knives to the point of her hating him. He had no backup plan for any scenario where his test would have worked. Basically he was terrible with planning.

The helicopter thing was probably contracted to a company. The guy likely assumed that orders simply changed last minute and a girl he did not drop off was simply getting picked up early. It doesn't seem like a difficult thing to explain away.

It’s not about what was morally “right” or “wrong”. He’s simply a metaphor for complete, unbridaled genius and ego. He literally says at one point the neural connections his mechanical brains make baffle him, and that he barely understands how progress is being made, even though it obviously is. He’s just another archetype demonstrating when humanity’s reach exceeds its grasp. Many times have scientific achievements (Nobel himself sometimes lamented how his dynamite became weaponized, and was slowly poisoned by the chemical in it) gotten away from their creator.

Caleb’s character explores the problems with humanizing AI. Most people focus on the dangers of an inhuman AI that can’t empathize with humans, such as 2001 or iRobot. But the real danger may lie in their humanization. Caleb’s flaw was a human one; he fell in love with the robot. Rather than it being completely unaware of this, it seems the AI was not only able to understand and reciprocate it (or at least mimic doing so), but use it to escape. Caleb was murderous and hateful towards Eli, but in a cold and calculating way, as many humans are towards those they see as oppressors. It shouldn’t be surprising that our robots are the same as us. The ultimate point was she DID pass the Turing test, many times over. She proved that, like a real woman might do, a human being will do ANYTHING for freedom, including murder. So yeah, the problem with Caleb and the robot is the typical “human, all too human” side of the AI problem.

Doesnt even matter. Her batteries would die before they even reached their destination. The outside world doesn't have induction coils running all through the ground to recharge her

Why does every thread have tumblr bitches in it now?

>sexually assaulting
what the fuck are you talking about ?

For some reason they seem to come in droves to fight Sup Forums and turn every thread into a political shitfest. You should see Sup Forums

The my only issue with the film is if you have a cursory understanding of AI there is no twist, only a scene where the idiot protagonist realizes he's an idiot.

I assume that the only people who automatically anthropomorphize intelligence are the same people who wouldn't bother seeing this film.

He didn't program the robots with Asimov's Three Laws, the dumbass

How can you sexually assault something that isn't alive in the first place?

How do I learn to dance like this absolute madman?

Those laws don't work, by design, you'd know that if you actually read his books.

This. No off-switch for robots fully capable of murdering the shit out of you. What a retard

what are you dumb amerimutts even talking about? Please explain

This whole movie was terrible. Except the excellent taste in real estate. Shame on the design of it.

I've read I, Robot. I'm aware the laws aren't perfect, but it would at least prevent the robot killing the two guys in the end of the movie.

They work, they just have flaws. But it's better than doing nothing.

what that other guy said. every asimov three laws robot story ius about how they produce unwanted results

He made bitchbots instead of waifubots

Attached: robocop.jpg (1358x960, 529K)

>calling others dumb
>haven't read Asimov
I'm not even american. Stop making retarded posts please

This nigga gets it

Yes but these unwanted results generally aren't murder of a human by the hands of a robot...

The worst law by far is the one about not letting a human come to harm. The only logical result of this is complete enslavement of the human race, as allowing a human to do anything remotely risky is violating the law.

>can’t even understand mutts
You’re the retarded one. Yikes...please read a book

read a book you slav fuck

be a manlet.

Put the laws in the context of the movie, nothing too terrible would happen. Also your example is a bit overblown...

this movie sucked lmao

he didnt install a remote off switch

He got shitfaced drunk several times, in the middle of a jailbreak AI test where he had every right to assume his creation would try to harm him, with a person who was brought there for the specific purpose to be manipulated by his AI, so therefore he couldn't trust, and he did this with no failsafes written into his computer systems, or instead of having a keycard, have a chip implanted into his skin on his hand or wrist....Yeah he did a lot wrong, none of it was morally questionable though