>White children should be BUSSED into schools dominated by ethnic minorities or vice versa to halt the rise of racial segregation, says report >forcing people to send their kids to schools full chimps, dundus, loos, muds and other scum
Wew
Samuel Baker
BAD MORNING!
Bentley Murphy
>brit/pol/
This isn't 2014 anymore, brit/pol/ now belongs to 2^3 chan.
Luis Fisher
Is she asking us to kill another Labour MP to ensure we get our way...?
Joseph Evans
Nah she's just fearing for her own life when she betrays her nation
Jonathan Perry
Yep.
Gabriel Foster
>accusing traitors of being traitors by disregarding the leave vote to serve their own globalist agenda and subjugating the country to EU directives despite a clear vote not to do that is bad because the fuckwit who murdered Jo Cox screamed about "death to traitors, freedom for Britain"
It's pretty much traitors not wanting to get called traitors. Hurts their fee-fees I guess. Though they're "citizens of the world" not the UK in their minds so I don't see why they get so offended about betraying something they have no loyalty to.
De-Jure, no. De-facto, yes. They integrate your economy more closely with that of another country and often involve setting agreed upon standards for products that will be traded between the two.
Consider: the closer our economy is integrated with the USA, the less politically independent we can afford to be from the USA. If we suddenly decide we want to let Russian submarines park in Scotland the USA can use abrogating the trade deal as leverage.
Furthermore, the USA is in the advantaged position as the significantly larger economy. They would almost certainly set the standards for products (i.e. shoddy carcinogenic American shit) and dictate the rules. A free trade deal with the USA is a major thing for the UK economy and a minor blip for the US's.
It's not a de-jure challenge to our independence, but it's a weakening of the barriers between our two nations. Barriers that if anything we should be asserting still exist.
I'd rather be part of the German empire than the American one.
Julian Clark
How are you guys not embarrassed to show your faces on Sup Forums after cancelling brexit?
Andrew Cruz
Because it isn't cancelled you nonce.
Connor Peterson
how can they actually not hear how crazy that sounds though? "lets get these white kids and send them to a school where they don't even speak English, because it'll make diversity!"
>Professor Eric Kaufmann
oh.
Carter Perez
>Have to ignore our own parliament to restore sovereignty of our own parliament
I'm living in a The Thick of It episode surely
Jose Robinson
>The country's people are being vetoed by the government What the FUCK brits?
Elijah Watson
Why are remaniacs suddenly talking about this decision like it was bound to happen and is something enshrined in British law?
Not a single remaniac ever spoke of the vote being against the british constitution before today.
Julian Thomas
>>White children should be BUSSED into schools dominated by ethnic minorities or vice versa to halt the rise of racial segregation, says report
why are they so intent on pushing race mixing? dumb white sluts will get fucked by muds and shit out welfare drains
>SW: I campaigned for Wales to come out of the EU in the recent referendum here. Some people are asking for an ‘Independent Wales in the EU’ but this is an oxymoron and makes no sense. Europe is an amazing and culturally rich continent but the EU is an undemocratic corporate driven superstate intent on destroying the diverse nation states of Europe.
>T: Do you have any comments about Scotland’s referendum?
>SW: I supported it in principle and they came very very close but it’s a bit of a mystery why the main official campaigners in Scotland were campaigning for an ‘independent Scotland within the EU’ – again an oxymoron in my view. Perhaps they believe that it would be the lesser of two evils when compared to the union with the UK state -maybe so but that isn’t independence.
>Not a single remaniac ever spoke of the vote being against the british constitution before today. The vote wasn't. The executive implementing the vote without parliamentary approval was.
Interestingly, Michael Foot wanted to keep Scottish Devolution on the cards in 1979 despite the terms of the referendum bill stating it was to be repealed. (Deferring repeal until after the election where presumably Labour would've campaigned on "Scotland said Yes" and implemented it anyway.)
Though the circumstances differ there as the bill was along the lines of "There will be a Scottish parliament, It'll be a parliament for Scotland that gets to do X Y Z, before it opens there has to be a referendum and if it doesn't get 60% of the electorate voting for it then it gets killed to death instead."
Thomas Perez
hows it going m80?
Ryan Parker
> The vote wasn't. The executive implementing the vote without parliamentary approval was.
Buy it literally wasn't until this morning because a bunch of unelected London elites and a nigger banker said so
Jose Wright
Ah yes, interestingly even though the act was repealed the 1979 manifesto retained the commitment: >Devolution >In our 1974 manifesto, we promised to create elected assembles in Scotland and Wales as part of our programme of decentralization and devolution of power. Following the result of the referendum in Wales, it is clear that the majority there does not want an assembly, and we accept their decision. In Scotland, however, a majority voted for devolution. >We reaffirm our commitment to devolution for Scotland. We are therefore ready to discuss constructively with all concerned any changes which would make the scheme in the present Act more widely acceptable, so that we can establish a Scottish Assembly.
Ah, poor Sunny Jim. To think Labour will go down in Scottish history as "The party that imposed the undemocratic 40% rule, stopped independence and then died on it's arse" instead of "The party that did actually want devolution except for 40-odd dissenting MPs, who voted with the Conservatives to bugger it up, and even then retained the commitment at every election until 1997 when they could reimplement it."
