>50 points to gryffindor even though slytherin won fair and square.
No reason why the kids that come out of slytherin end up being dickheads.
50 points to gryffindor even though slytherin won fair and square
Ryan Bell
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Elijah Torres
Harry should've died.
Logan Long
DEH!
Xavier Brooks
why didn't the eagles just fly them to mordor?
Nolan Foster
Evan White
Yes yes well done, Slytherin, well done Slytherin, HOWEVER - there are some last minute issues we need to take into account.well, actually there's only one issue, and that's that Slytherin house is a part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Sebastian Sanchez
"EXPECTO PATRONUUUUUUUUUUUUUM"
Xavier Ortiz
"i regret to inform you sir but Harry Potter and his friends scorched my buttock while i was rooting rather peacefully for Slytherin's Quidditch team on the sidelines. further disciplinary action is required. i can not stand BUT must for this injustice."
Dominic Mitchell
The points system is pointless and it's only reward are bragging rights so who cares?
Also, teachers can apparently give and take random ammounts of point from students without any sort of consistency so I don't see why giving Gryffindor a million points for saving the school was so bad.
Nathan Foster
Why can't adult children from tumblr(and laughed out of /lit/_ not understand that these are poorly made children movies(based on poorly written books for ESL students in the UK)?